1 / 40

Detection and Attribution of African Rainfall Change

Detection and Attribution of African Rainfall Change. Martin Hoerling, NOAA 11th Annual CCSM Workshop 21 June 2006 in collaboration with Jim Hurrell, Jon Eischeid, Adam Phillips. Undernourished Population (2000 - 2002) according to FAO.

manon
Download Presentation

Detection and Attribution of African Rainfall Change

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Detection and Attribution of African Rainfall Change Martin Hoerling, NOAA 11th Annual CCSM Workshop 21 June 2006 in collaboration with Jim Hurrell, Jon Eischeid, Adam Phillips

  2. Undernourished Population (2000 - 2002) according to FAO. Courtesy of FAO 2005.

  3. 70% of Africans Live by Farming 40% of Exports Are from Agricultural Products

  4. 1993 2000 The Warming of Africa

  5. Change in Fresh Water Availability by 2025 Only Due to Population Change

  6. What is the Fate of 21st Century African Rainfall? GFDL AR4 coupled models predict an extremely dry Sahel in the future Held et al. 2005

  7. A Physical Explanation for the 20th Century Drying May Provide Insight on 21st Century Change

  8. Trend Toward Increased Aridity in the 20th Century from station data

  9. Trend Toward Increased Aridity in the 20th Century from station data

  10. Trend Toward Increased Aridity in the 20th Century from station data

  11. “Detection is the process of demonstrating that an observed change is significantly different (in a statistical sense) than can be explained by natural variability.”(IPCC, 2001) “Attribution is the process of establishing cause and effect with some defined level of confidence, including assessment of competing hypotheses. “(IPCC, 2001)

  12. Detection &Attribution Tools • Observed, Monthly 1950-1999 Gridded pcpn & sfcT from U. of Delaware, and also East Anglia (CRU). • Unforced Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean Simulations, 3 CGCMs each spanning 240 Years. (Detection) • Atmospheric Climate Simulations Forced by Observed, Global SSTs for 1950-1999. 5 AGCMs, 80 member, multi-model ensemble. (Attribution of Ocean Forcing) • Forced Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean Simulations (AR4). Observed GHGs,Aerosols and Natural External Forcings for 1950-1999. (Attribution of External Forcing). • Time-slice experiments at ~2050 to understand differences in African climate projections by GFDL and NCAR models.

  13. OBSERVATIONS 20th Century African Drying Correlated with Warming Tropical Oceans

  14. AGCM SIMULATIONS Time Evolution of African Drying Consistent with Atmospheric Response to Observed Global SST Forcing

  15. Rainfall Trend Patterns for Northern African Wet Season Spatial Pattern of 20th Century African Drying Consistent with Atmospheric Response to Observed Global SST Forcing

  16. Rainfall Trend Patterns for Southern African Wet Season Spatial Pattern of 20th Century African Drying Consistent with Atmospheric Response to Observed Global SST Forcing

  17. Attribution Summary I • Observed SST Forcing During 1950-1999 Was the Immediate Attributable Cause for African Drying Trends • Time series of African drying • Spatial patterns of African drying • Seasonal movement of African drying • Reproducibility of the SST forced drying signal

  18. Indian Ocean warming appears most relevant for explaining 20th Century Southern African drying

  19. Interhemispheric SST Contrast r = 0.59 NH Warm NH Cold Sahel Rainfall

  20. Atlantic Ocean SST forcing appears most relevant for explaining 20th Century Sahelian drying

  21. ATLANTIC-ONLY AGCM SIMULATIONS Time Evolution of Sahelian Drying Consistent with Atmospheric Response to Observed Atlantic-basin SST Forcing

  22. Attribution Summary II

  23. Attribution Summary II

  24. Attribution Summary II • Observed trend amplitudes exceed the GHG+Aerosol Signal by an order of magnitude • No Projection of the Observed African Rainfall Trends on a GHG+Aerosol Signal • GFDL CM2 a most intriguing exception (outlier) for Sahelian Drying

  25. AR4 CGCM SIMULATIONS & PROJECTIONS

  26. AR4 CGCM SIMULATIONS & PROJECTIONS

  27. A Tale of Two Models 1950-1999 AR4 Simulated Rainfall Trends July-September

  28. A Tale of Two Models 2000-2049 AR4 Projected Rainfall Trends July-September

  29. Projected (A1B) SST Change by 2049 GFDL-CM2 CCSM3 Total Change +1.2°C +1.0°C Total Change- Global Mean July-September

  30. AGCM and AR4 Projected JAS Rainfall Changes by 2049

  31. AGCM and AR4 Projected JAS Rainfall Changes by 2049

  32. Outstanding Questions Q: Is there an attributable cause for the post-1950 African drying trends…PTI? A: Yes. The regionality and seasonality of African precipitation trends are directly attributable to fluctuations in global SSTs. Q: Is there an attributable cause for the post-1950 African drying trends…PT2? A: The rainfall changes appear beyond those expected from natural coupled ocean- atmosphere variations under modern climate conditions. Q: What role did anthropogenic forcing play in post-1950 African drying? A: The vast majority of AR4 simulations of 1950-99 African rainfall trends fail to project upon the observed trend patterns, suggesting GHG&aerosol forcing played little or no role. Q: Is African rainfall sensitive to A1B Scenario GHG forcing to 2049?A: Yes. The majority of AR4 simulations exhibit a positive (wet) Sahel rainfall response, and a negative (dry) southern African rainfall response. Projected SST changes appear to be key, as is the AGCM sensitivity to those SST forcings.

  33. Outstanding Questions Q: Is there an attributable cause for the post-1950 African drying trends…PTI? A: Yes. The regionality and seasonality of African precipitation trends are directly attributable to fluctuations in global SSTs. Q: Is there an attributable cause for the post-1950 African drying trends…PT2? A: The rainfall changes appear beyond those expected from natural coupled ocean- atmosphere variations under modern climate conditions. Q: What role did anthropogenic forcing play in post-1950 African drying? A: The vast majority of AR4 simulations of 1950-99 African rainfall trends fail to project upon the observed trend patterns, suggesting GHG&aerosol forcing played little or no role. Q: Is African rainfall sensitive to A1B Scenario GHG forcing to 2049?A: Yes. The majority of AR4 simulations exhibit a positive (wet) Sahel rainfall response, and a negative (dry) southern African rainfall response. Projected SST changes appear to be key, as is the AGCM sensitivity to those SST forcings.

  34. Outstanding Questions Q: Is there an attributable cause for the post-1950 African drying trends…PTI? A: Yes. The regionality and seasonality of African precipitation trends are directly attributable to fluctuations in global SSTs. Q: Is there an attributable cause for the post-1950 African drying trends…PT2? A: The rainfall changes appear beyond those expected from natural coupled ocean- atmosphere variations under modern climate conditions. Q: What role did anthropogenic forcing play in post-1950 African drying? A: The vast majority of AR4 simulations of 1950-99 African rainfall trends fail to project upon the observed trend patterns, suggesting GHG&aerosol forcing played little or no role. Q: Is African rainfall sensitive to A1B Scenario GHG forcing to 2049?A: Yes. The majority of AR4 simulations exhibit a positive (wet) Sahel rainfall response, and a negative (dry) southern African rainfall response. Projected SST changes appear to be key, as is the AGCM sensitivity to those SST forcings.

  35. Outstanding Questions Q: Is there an attributable cause for the post-1950 African drying trends…PTI? A: Yes. The regionality and seasonality of African precipitation trends are directly attributable to fluctuations in global SSTs. Q: Is there an attributable cause for the post-1950 African drying trends…PT2? A: The rainfall changes appear beyond those expected from natural coupled ocean- atmosphere variations under modern climate conditions. Q: What role did anthropogenic forcing play in post-1950 African drying? A: The vast majority of AR4 simulations of 1950-99 African rainfall trends fail to project upon the observed trend patterns, suggesting GHG&aerosol forcing played little or no role. Q: Is African rainfall sensitive to A1B Scenario GHG forcing to 2049?A: Yes. The majority of AR4 simulations exhibit a positive (wet) Sahel rainfall response, and a negative (dry) southern African rainfall response. Projected SST changes appear to be key, as is the AGCM sensitivity to those SST forcings.

More Related