180 likes | 406 Views
Earthquake damage to residential buildings in South Iceland. Rajesh Rupakhety Ragnar Sigbjörnsson. Contents. The study area : Hveragerði Hazard scenario: Peak Ground Acceleartion Hazard scenario: Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) Building vulnerability : Damage Probability Matrices
E N D
Earthquake damage to residential buildings in South Iceland Rajesh Rupakhety Ragnar Sigbjörnsson
Contents • The study area : Hveragerði • Hazard scenario: Peak Ground Acceleartion • Hazard scenario: Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) • Building vulnerability : Damage Probability Matrices • Damage factors: Spatially variable MMI • Damage factors: Constant MMI • Damage factors: ATC-13 DPM • Summary
The study area: South Iceland Seismic Zone 29 May 2008 17 June 2000 21 June 2000
Hazard scenario: PGA Mw 6.3, 2008 Ölfus Earthquake Peak resultant acceleration is taken as the rotation-invariant measure of PGA
Hazard scenario: MMI Mw 6.3, 2008 Ölfus Earthquake
Building vulnerability: Damage data Vulnerability Study of the South-Iceland Lowland Based on Data from the 2000 Earthquakes - Sólveig Thorvaldsdóttir, Rainrace for the 6th framework EU project FORESIGHT.
Building vulnerability: Damage Probability Matrices MMI VII 1 Empirical probability distribution function 80 Damage factor (%)
Damage factors: scenario using MMI • Timber buildings • Count: 454 • Mean DF: 3.15 % • Max DF: 75 % • Std DF: 10 %
Damage factors: scenario using MMI • Concrete buildings • Count: 587 • Mean DF: 4.37 % • Max DF: 78 % • Std DF: 11 %
Damage factors: scenario using MMI • Masonry buildings • Count: 97 • Mean DF: 8.42 % • Max DF: 78 % • Std DF: 16 %
Summary • Timber buildings show the best performance with a mean damage factor of 3.15 % • The simulation results show that the concrete buildings suffer a damage factor of 4.37 % on average • Masonry buildings show the worst performance with a mean damage factor of 8.42 % • ATC 33 damage probability matrices gave similar results as those obtained from damage data in South Iceland • Considering just one value of intensity for the whole town of Hverageði over-estimates the damage factor, almost by a factor of 2 • Consideration of spatial variability of ground motion intensity gave results close to the actual damage observed after the Mw 6.3, 2008 Ölfus Earthquake