1 / 9

The NAPHSIS Response

The NAPHSIS Response. How Jurisdictions Will Be Impacted by Intelligence Reform Regulations Leesa Shem-Tov NAPHSIS Re-engineering Project Manager. What Challenges Do We Face?. Regional meeting exercise Not a scientific survey The Question :

mara-leach
Download Presentation

The NAPHSIS Response

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The NAPHSIS Response How Jurisdictions Will Be Impacted by Intelligence Reform Regulations Leesa Shem-Tov NAPHSIS Re-engineering Project Manager

  2. What Challenges Do We Face? • Regional meeting exercise • Not a scientific survey • The Question: Which issues will have the greatest impact to you if you need to comply within two years of Intel Reform regulations becoming final?

  3. Issues • Providing central issuance • Becoming a restricted use jurisdiction • Filing births electronically • Filing deaths electronically • Having EVVE data back to 1935 • Linking births and deaths back to 1935 • Using required security paper features • Meeting personnel and building security requirements

  4. Regional Meeting Affiliations Washington Maine Montana North Dakota Minnesota Oregon VT Wisconsin NH Idaho South Dakota MA Alaska New York Michigan Wyoming CT RI Pennsylvania Iowa NYC Nebraska Nevada Ohio NJ Indiana Utah Illinois DE WV Colorado MD Missouri Virginia Kansas DC California Kentucky N. Carolina Tennessee Arizona Oklahoma Arkansas New Mexico S. Carolina Georgia MS Alabama Guam LA Texas Northern Marianas American Samoa Florida Virgin Islands Hawaii Puerto Rico West Midwest Northeast Southern

  5. The Northeast Region • Linking births and deaths back to 1935 • Having EVVE data back to 1935 • Meeting personnel and building security requirements • 9 jurisdictions participating

  6. Midwest Region • Tied for first place: • Linking births and deaths • EVVE data back to 1935 • Restricted use jurisdiction • personnel/building security requirements • Filing deaths electronically • Central issuance • 8 jurisdictions participating

  7. Southern Region • EVVE data back to 1935 • Linking births/deaths back to 1935 • Filing deaths electronically • 5 jurisdictions participating

  8. Western • Linking births/deaths, meeting security requirements • EVVE data back to 1935 • Restricted use jurisdiction, filing deaths electronically • 13 jurisdictions participating

  9. Ranking of Impacts Nationally • Getting data sets back to 1935 cross matched is a challenge for 80% of respondents • 65% of participating jurisdictions are concerned about addressing personnel and physical plant security and getting data ready for EVVE • Filing deaths electronically is an issue for 33% of respondents • Central issuance, restricted use, electronic birth and security paper use are not of great impact

More Related