240 likes | 369 Views
NC 12 – Rodanthe Breach Long-Term Improvements Merger Team Meeting. September 11, 2014. Project Area. Phase IIb Status. Concurrence Point 2/2A signed in November 2012 Alternatives to be studied in detail: Bridge on New Location Bridge within Existing NC 12 Easement.
E N D
NC 12 – Rodanthe Breach Long-Term ImprovementsMerger Team Meeting September 11, 2014
Phase IIb Status • Concurrence Point 2/2A signed in November 2012 • Alternatives to be studied in detail: • Bridge on New Location • Bridge within Existing NC 12 Easement
Phase IIb Status • EA signed on December 2013 • Public Hearings Held in January 2014 • Meetings in Ocracoke, Rodanthe/Buxton, and Manteo • Comment Period ended January 24
Public Hearing Comments • Received 12 oral comments and 78 written comments • Commenters asked to state alternative preference, reasons why, and suggestions for design improvements to both alternatives
Public Hearing Comments • Preferences: • Bridge within Existing NC 12 Easement: 12 • Bridge on New Location: 33, plus 64 petition signatures • Other: • Alternative that can be built sooner: 3 • Beach Nourishment/ No Bridges: 26, plus 208 petition signatures
Local Government/ NGO • Dare County- Prefer Bridge in Easement • Citizens Action Committee to Replace the Bonner Bridge • Hatteras Island Property Management Group • Southern Environmental Law Center • Surfrider Foundation, Outer Banks Chapter- Prefer Bridge on New Location
Phase IIb- Bridge on New Location • DOI Comments- Preference for Bridge on New Location • Minimize Impacts to T&E species • Management of Refuge resources • NMFS Comments- Preference for Bridge within Existing NC 12 Easement • Impacts to SAV habitat
Phase IIb- Bridge on New Location • Shift alignment east to minimize amount of bridge within SAV habitat • Dense SAV areas along southern end of 2013 bridge alignment • Alignment change should not increase impacts within Refuge
Phase IIb- Bridge on New Location • Residential Relocations • Visual Impacts • Jurisdictional Wetland Impacts • Essential Fish Habitat/ Submerged Aquatic Vegetation
Permit Requirements Bridge within Existing NC 12 Easement Bridge on New Location Section 404 Permit Section 401 Permit CAMA Major Development Permit USFWS Special Use Permit Section 404 Permit Section 401 Permit CAMA Major Development Permit USFWS Special Use Permit/ Highway Easement NPS Special Use Permit USCG Advance Approval
Additional Requirements Section 106 Coordination Section 7 Consultation Essential Fish Habitat Assessment
Litigation Status • Fourth Circuit Court Decision • Issued August 6, 2014 • Upheld NEPA analysis of project • Section 4(f) analysis sent back to District Court for further consideration
Phase IIb Next Steps • Hold CP 3 (LEDPA) Meeting • Hold CP 4A (Avoidance & Minimization) Meeting • Complete Section 106, Section 7, EFH coordination • Issue any additional environmental analysis, decision document for Phase IIb • Award design-build contract for construction