1 / 24

Relationship between hospital safety climate and outcomes

Relationship between hospital safety climate and outcomes. Sara Singer, Alyson Falwell, Shoutzu Lin, Toby Rathgeb, Laurence Baker AcademyHealth Annual Meeting June 26, 2006

marcel
Download Presentation

Relationship between hospital safety climate and outcomes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Relationship between hospital safety climate and outcomes Sara Singer, Alyson Falwell, Shoutzu Lin, Toby Rathgeb, Laurence Baker AcademyHealth Annual Meeting June 26, 2006 Financial support for this study has been provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality RO1 HSO13920 and by the VA HSR&D

  2. Patient safety and safety culture • Significant patient safety problems plague US hospitals • A culture of safety is increasingly recognized as a key to reducing adverse events in hospitals • Yet we lack conclusive evidence of the relationship between safety culture and patient safety outcomes

  3. Research questions • How do individuals working in hospitals perceive the culture of safety in their facilities? • Does perceived safety culture relate to hospital safety performance? • Do both strength and uniformity of safety climate matter? • Whose perception of safety culture corresponds most to safety outcomes?

  4. Hospital safety culture and its measurement • Shared values, beliefs, and norms of behavior, articulated by senior management and translated consistently into effective work practices • Measured using the Patient Safety Climate in Healthcare Organizations (PSCHO) survey • PSCHO measures safety climate, i.e., perceptions of safety culture at a point in time • We examine rates of “problematic responses,” i.e., those indicating a lack of safety culture

  5. Survey content and sample • Survey includes 38 questions and 9 sub-scales specific to individual aspects of safety culture • Surveyed 18,361 individuals from a stratified random sample of 92 US hospitals, representing four regions of the US and three size categories between March 2004 and May 2005 • 100% of active, hospital-based physicians, • 100% of senior managers (dept heads or above) • 10% random sample of all other personnel • 52% response rate

  6. Comparison of safety climate to outcomes • Two individual-level factors, most proximate determinants of safety behaviors • Willingness to seek help (alpha = 0.58) • Asking for help is a sign of incompetence • Telling others about my mistakes is embarrassing • If I make a mistake that has significant consequences and nobody notices, I do not tell anyone about it • Fear of blame & punishment (alpha = 0.61) • If people find out that I made a mistake, I will be disciplined • Clinicians who make serious mistakes are usually punished

  7. Examination of strength and uniformity of safety climate to outcomes • Strength of safety climate (mean problematic response) • Uniformity of safety climate (variance in problematic response) • Interaction between them Safety culture uniformity Safety culture strength Safety outcomes

  8. Consideration of alternative perceptions of safety culture • Nurses v. doctors • Front line workers v. senior managers

  9. Outcomes measures and analysis • Measured clinical outcomes using AHRQ patient safety indicators (PSIs), computed using 2000 HCUP data • Selected 14 out of 20 PSIs that we hypothesized would be related to safety climate. Excluded indicators: • Whose outcome is driven by a single unit (obstetrics) • That have been criticized as highly unreliable (failure to rescue) • For which no events occurred in study hospitals (transfusion reaction) • Included in analysis a stratified random sample of 47 hospitals from 15 states for which PSCHO and PSI data are available • Analyzed relationship of safety climate to all PSIs or groups of PSIs

  10. Safety climate in 92 hospitals My unit recognizes individual safety achievement through rewards and incentives If I make a mistake that has significant consequences and nobody notices, I do not tell anyone about it

  11. Safety climate in 92 hospitals Telling others about my mistakes is embarrassing If I make a mistake that has significant consequences and nobody notices, I do not tell anyone about it Asking for help is a sign of incompetence

  12. Safety climate in 92 hospitals If people find out that I made a mistake, I will be disciplined Clinicians who make serious mistakes are usually punished

  13. Relationship of safety climate dimensions to PSIs • Safety climate related more strongly to PSIs than did other hospital characteristics: nurse-to-patient hour ratios, early technology adoption, and incident reporting activity

  14. Relationship of safety climate dimensions to PSIs • Safety climate related more strongly to PSIs than did other hospital characteristics: nurse-to-patient hour ratios, early technology adoption, and incident reporting activity

  15. Relationship of safety climate dimensions to PSIs • Safety climate related more strongly to PSIs than did other hospital characteristics: nurse-to-patient hour ratios, early technology adoption, and incident reporting activity

  16. Relationship of safety climate dimensions to PSIs • Safety climate related more strongly to PSIs than did other hospital characteristics: nurse-to-patient hour ratios, early technology adoption, and incident reporting activity

  17. Relationship of strength and uniformity of willingness to seek help to PSIs

  18. PSI-safety climate relationship differences by type of personnel

  19. PSI-safety climate relationship differences by type of personnel

  20. PSI-safety climate relationship differences by type of personnel

  21. PSI-safety climate relationship differences by type of personnel

  22. Discussion • Two dimensions of safety climate were statistically significantly associated with PSI performance • Lack of willingness to seek help (p<.05) and • Fear of blame & punishment (p<.01) • Uniformity moderated the relationship between willingness to seek help and safety performance • Nurse and front line workers’ perceptions correlated more strongly with adverse safety events than did physician and senior managers’ perceptions respectively

  23. Strengths and limitations • Strengths • One of the first studies to link safety climate directly to clinical safety outcomes • Results representative of US hospitals • Limitations • Need to explore other dimensions of safety climate • Need verification of adverse event rates • Need longitudinal study to establish causality

  24. Conclusion • Findings support the claim that culture and outcomes are strongly related • Both strength and uniformity of safety climate matter • Senior managers may misperceive important aspects of safety climate • Presence of blame and unwillingness to seek help suggest interventions that address deeply-ingrained beliefs are needed to improve hospital safety culture

More Related