1 / 14

EE Detection Which monitors are candidate violators of PM2.5 NAAQS?

Response to the Bohnecamp memo Rudy Husar rhusar@wustl.edu , Kari Hoijarvi , Washington University, St. Louis. EE Detection Which monitors are candidate violators of PM2.5 NAAQS? What days have values above the PM2.5 NAAQS ? EE Documentation

marcie
Download Presentation

EE Detection Which monitors are candidate violators of PM2.5 NAAQS?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Response to the BohnecampmemoRudy Husar rhusar@wustl.edu, Kari Hoijarvi, Washington University, St. Louis • EE Detection • Which monitors are candidate violators of PM2.5 NAAQS? • What days have values above the PM2.5 NAAQS? • EE Documentation • What are the other sources of PM2.5 near the monitor(s) • Do they impact the monitors on exceedance days? • Can one illustrate the effect of other sources vs. the volcano? • What are the conditions when volcano impacts on EE monitors? • What is the volcanic source/emission strength? • What are the met. conditions/pathways of volcanic impacts on EE monitors? • Are these consistent for most events? • Are the tools and methods adequate to document the above? • Are existing surface & satellite observations and modeling tools available? • Can those be combined/integrated for robust EE documentation? • How/when is this to be done? (C. Bohnencamp memo)

  2. Candidate for violating Daily PM2.5 NAAQS Candidates for violating Yearly PM2.5 NAAQS Kona and Hove(?) on Hawaii are candidates of yearly PM2.5 NAAQS violations None of the Hawaii monitors are candidates of daily PM2.5 NAAQS violations

  3. What days have values above the PM2.5 NAAQS?Time series for Kona on standard DataFed Browser Average = 14.2 For 2011-2012 the average PM2.5 = 14.2 ug/m3 Potentially, any sample over 12 ug/m3 is violating and a candidate for EE flag

  4. What days have values above the PM2.5 NAAQS?Based on AQS PM2.5 data for 2011 and 2012 There are 704 daily samples. Of these 477 samples or 68% are > 12 ug/m3 (black dots). If all 477 were successfully flagged, the monitor average would be 8.5 ug/m3 be 8.5 ug/m3 – too many flagged Compliance could be reached if samples with concentration above 17.5 ug/m3 (168 samples) were successfully flagged Extrapolated to three years, 2011-13, there will be at least ~ 250 days to be flagged at Kona.

  5. What days have values above the PM2.5 NAAQS? For Kona (2011-12), determined by the Hawaii EE DSS Screening Tool There are other strategies for flag-day selection from the pool of 477 that is above 12 ug/m3. Another approach is based on spatial anomaly, i.e. deviation from the neighboring sites. Using that criteria would require flagging 174 days, compared to 168 days. Given the many (over ~250) days to be flagged, choosing a good flag sampling and flag documentation strategy is a key task for the collaborating workgroup.

  6. Other sources of PM2.5 impacting the EE monitor(s) Background PM2.5 – oceanic aerosol Aggregate of 6 background monitors The Hawaii background PM2.5 is quite uniform at ~ 6 ug/m3 But spikes up to 12 ug/m3 can occur near-simultaneously at all monitors. A possible source of background spikes is Asian dust reaching HI – suggested by the NRL NAAPS model These should be considered as ‘other sources’.

  7. Distinguishing volcano vs background PM2.5 sources Spatial anomaly: Excess over the fluctuating background PM2.5 concentration Background ~ 6 ug/m3 Red line is the spatial anomaly: Excess PM2.5 at KONA over the spatially uniform but time-varying background Spatial analysis could help distinguishing background and volcanic PM2.5

  8. OMI Satellite Columnar SO2 Seasonal averages, 2004-2010 The SO2 concentration is highest at the volcano – in the vicinity of the EE sources The transport is mostly toward the West with the trade winds

  9. MODIS satellite measurements of volcano aerosol (sulfate) Seasonal averages of AOD, 2004-2010 High AOD downwind of Hawaii, the volcano source. No evidence for other major sources Seasonally the volcano aerosol plume is more in the Spring and Summer Plume transport is with the trade winds

  10. OMI satellite measurements of columnar NO2 Seasonal averages, 2004-2010 Indicates the high anthropogenic emissions in Oahu. No NO2 signal over Hawaii

  11. Why is the PM2.5 impact so far away from the SO2 source?SO2-Sulfate conversion takes time and distance Satellite measurements of SO2 and AOD Average 2004-2010, June, Jul August OMI SO2 Column Concentration SO2 highest near the source MODIS AOD PM Column Possibly accelerated in fog/clouds -> VOG Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) highest downwind

  12. Aspects of volcanic emission transport: Conceptual Stagnating, mixing ‘pool’ in the wake of the island Surface Winds: Measurements, NOGAPS model

  13. Hawaii EE Documentation Tool Surface Winds OMI satellite SO2 Bad data MODIS Terra MODIS AQUA Image MODIS AOT All the analysis was performed using different modules in the Hawaii version of the EE Decision Support System. The Hawaii system documentation is marginal at best  .

  14. EE DSS Integration with VMAP: Vog Measurement and Predication Systemand other systems?

More Related