1 / 9

Agency QA Self-Assessment Sunflower Project Chris Lewis & Stacey Calhoon

Agency QA Self-Assessment Sunflower Project Chris Lewis & Stacey Calhoon. January 12, 2009. About Survey. Should’ve been sent out to agencies creating interfaces. Sent to everyone. 9 generic ?’s about QA/QC processes within agencies. Familiarize agency heads with FMS. Name Face.

marcos
Download Presentation

Agency QA Self-Assessment Sunflower Project Chris Lewis & Stacey Calhoon

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Agency QA Self-AssessmentSunflower ProjectChris Lewis & Stacey Calhoon January 12, 2009

  2. About Survey • Should’ve been sent out to agencies creating interfaces. • Sent to everyone. • 9 generic ?’s about QA/QC processes within agencies. • Familiarize agency heads with FMS. • Name • Face

  3. Survey Usage • Where are they? • Intended to familiarize/re-familiarize agency heads with QA. • Statewide Standard • Improve Data Quality • Reduce Errors and Re-work • Maintain FMS Project Schedule • Why? • Project Integrity • State Growth • Business Practices • Future Projects

  4. Statistics • Sent to: • 23 Interfacing Agencies/Regents • 7 Non Interfacing Agencies/Regents • Responses: • 16 from Interfacing Agencies/Regents • 3 from Non Interfacing Agencies/Regents • Test Script Samples (Asked everyone to mail/email) • 2 (Secretary of State, SRS)

  5. Who Responded? • On Time - Aging, Commerce, Corporation Commission, Health & Environment, Health Policy Authority, Insurance, KPERS, Labor, Secretary of State, SRS, KDOT, KU MED, PSU, WSU • Late - Juvenile Justice Authority, Treasurer, Wildlife & Parks, FHSU, KU • Never - Adjutant General, Education, Lottery, Revenue, ESU • Problems Submitting - KSU • Informed Us They Couldn’t - KCI

  6. Quality of Responses • Brief but to the point • Could tell which agencies had a good idea/confidence level about their agency’s QA by their responses. • Gave us an idea of what they’re working with. • Responses gave good starting point for future QA discussions.

  7. Can This Benefit You? • V: Drive Access • V:\FMS_Project\Shared\QA Program\Analysis of Interfacing Agencies QA Standards\Analysis of Agency QA Survey • How can my group utilize the information? • ‘By Agency’ Sheet

  8. Next Steps • Agency Visits • Walk the Walk! • Statewide Standard • Recommendations • Supplemental Help

  9. Questions and Answers ?

More Related