1 / 11

2000 년 4 월 19 일

On Financial Derivatives. 김 용 환 국제금융센타 ( KCIF ). 2000 년 4 월 19 일. < Scenario I >. Assume IBM price on 4/19/2000 to be x: 4/19/2000 => Long IBM @100 4/19/2001 => Short IBM @x 4/19/2001 => Profit and Loss = x – 100. < Scenario II >. [ Agreement ]

mardi
Download Presentation

2000 년 4 월 19 일

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. On Financial Derivatives 김 용 환 국제금융센타(KCIF) 2000년 4월 19일

  2. <Scenario I > • Assume IBM price on 4/19/2000 to be x: • 4/19/2000 => Long IBM @100 • 4/19/2001 => Short IBM @x • 4/19/2001 => Profit and Loss = x – 100

  3. <Scenario II > • [ Agreement ] • 4/19/2000 => Long IBM @100 • 4/19/2001 => Short IBM @x • 4/19/2001 => Finance Charge for 1-year = 10 • 4/19/2001 => Profit and Loss = x – (100+10)

  4. <Scenario III > • [ Agreement ] • 4/19/2000 => Agreed to be Long IBM @y on 4/19/2001 • ( y is fixed on 4/19/2000 ) • 4/19/2001 => Profit and Loss = x – y • ( x is IBM price on 4/19/2001 ) • Note: if y = 110, • P&L of ScenarioII = P&L of ScenarioIII. • (profit and loss)

  5. < Scenario IV > • Assume the finance charge to be 10% per annum: • 4/19/2000 => Borrow Cash y/1.1 • 4/19/2000 => Long IBM @100 • 4/19/2000 => Value = 100 – (y/1.1) • 4/19/2001 => Pay back Cash y • 4/19/2001 => Short IBM @x • 4/19/2001 => Profit and Loss = x – y – [100 – (y/1.1)] • Note: if y = 110, • P&L of Scenario II = P&L of Scenario IV.

  6. <Expectation versus Arbitrage > • Kolmogrov’s Strong Law of Large Numbers • Let Xi’s be independent random numbers sampled from the same distribution with mean (expectation)  and let • S(n) = ( Xi)/n (arithmetic average). Then • lim S(n) =  • with probability one. • Example • Consider a game - tossing a coin and receiving $1 for heads and nothing for tails. Fifty cents is a fair price of the game in the Strong Law sense.

  7. Time Value of Money • Let t < T. Then the value at time t of a dollar promised at time T is given by • exp{–r(T– t)} • for some constantr > 0. The rate r is then the continuously compounded interest rate for this period. • Stock Model • Assume XN(, ). Then the natural logarithm of the stock price over some time period is given by X, i.e., • ln (ST) – ln (St) = X, or ST = Stexp(X)

  8. Forward • Two parties enter into a contract whereby one agrees to give the other the stock at some agreed time(T) in the future in exchange for an amount(K) agreed now. • < Expectation Pricing for Forward > • By the strong law, • E[exp (–rT) (ST– K) ] = 0 • => K = E[ST] • => K = S0 exp(+0.52) • < Arbitrage Pricing for Forward > • Now: Borrow S0 and buy the stock with it and short forward at K • At T: Pay back S0 exp(rT) and settle forward at K • => K <= S0 exp(rT) and similarly we have K >= S0 exp(rT) • => K = S0 exp(rT)

  9. Call Option • The buyer of a call option has the right to buy the underlying security on or before a specific date (T) at a specific price (K). Then the payoff = Max[ ST– K, 0 ]. Let C = C( t, S(t) ) denote the value of the option at time t. • < Arbitrage Pricing for European Call Option > • dS = S dt + S dW • dB = rB dt • dC = Ct dt + CS dS + 0.5 CSS dS dS • = [ Ct + SCS + 0.52S2CSS ] dt + SCS dW • Let  = C –S with  = CS , then • d= [ Ct + 0.52S2CSS ] dt • = r dt

  10. We have the Black-Sholes partial differential equation • Ct + rSCS + 0.52S2CSS = rC • with the boundary condition, C( T, S(T) ) = payoff • < Martingale Pricing for European Call Option > • dS = S dt + S dW • dB = rB dt, letting Z = S/B, then • dZ = ( – r)Z dt + Z dW( by Ito’s lemma ) • letting  = ( – r)/, then • dW = dt + dW ( by Girsanov’s Theorem ) • dZ = Z dW <=> ZT = Z0 exp(–0.52t +  dWT) • C( 0, S(0) ) = E[ exp(– rT) payoff ]

  11. < Fundamental Theorem of Derivative Asset Pricing > • There is a risk-neutral probability or an equivalent Martingalemeasure if and only if there is no arbitrage. • Also, there is a unique risk-neutral probability if and only if any European derivative asset can be hedged. In this case, the model is said to be complete.

More Related