260 likes | 470 Views
Sharing experiences The Chilean Pension System. Rafael Del Campo Former National Director INP. Chile. 3 continents: America, Oceania and Antarctica. Total area: 2,006,096 Km2 American Area: 756,096 Km2 15 Regions Population: 15,116,435 Inhabitants 49.3% Male, 50.7% Female
E N D
Sharing experiences The Chilean Pension System Rafael Del Campo Former National Director INP
Chile • 3 continents: America, Oceania and Antarctica. • Total area: 2,006,096 Km2 • American Area: 756,096 Km2 • 15 Regions • Population: 15,116,435 Inhabitants • 49.3% Male, 50.7% Female • Main region: 40.1%; 59.9% Other regions • Urban 86.6%, 13.4% Rural • Government and State Administration • Unitary state. Decentralized Administration • Presidency of the Republic • 22 Ministries • GDP 2005 U.S. $ 145,920 million Per capita income U.S. $ 8,875
Sharing experiences 85 years of Former Pension System 26 years of the Individual Capitalization Pension System 1 year of Social Protection Guaranties in the Pension System
85 years of Former Pension System PENSIONS: PAY-AS-YOU-GO SYSTEM • 1924 Workers´ Insurance Fund, the institution which preceded the Social Insurance Service. Coverage was extended to employees with the creation of the Private Employees´ Fund (EMPART); and Public Employees and Journalists Fund (CANAEMPU). • Progressive increase of the coverage in social security, through the creation of different Social Security Funds over the years. • 1979 32 Social Security Funds. This generated over a hundred different social security treatments, including Retirement, Disability, Survivorship and Welfare Pensions.
Former Pension System: Main Weaknesses (1980 diagnostic) • Financial imbalance - The active contributors financed the pensions of the passives, but at the same time a reserve fund was created with part of the resources, for future requirements. This became increasingly difficult and no reserves were accumulated. • Inequality in access to benefits - Lack of uniformity. - Different benefits corresponding to identical contributions and identical needs. • Faults in administration - Inefficient administration of resources. - The incorporation of new beneficiaries was not always supported by the corresponding actuarial studies and funding. The relationship active contributors / retirees declined from 10.8: 1 (1960) to 2.2: 1 (1980).
1980’s Reform to standardize and rationalize the systems then in force. The First work was to establish standards in the Former System: • Men must retire at 65 years of age and women at 60. • The state began to collect all contributions of the different Former Funds. • All the former Funds administrated by INP (National Pensions Institute) • Fiscal commitments with the pensions debts in long terms (Retirement benefits Bond and Pensions).
Fiscal commitments with the pensions debts Actually (2009) The Former Pension System is: • Collecting only 3% of contributions. • Paying 71% of pensions. • Paying the Retirement Benefit Bond for those who contributed in any of the funds of the former system, but will get a pension in the Contributory Pensions Scheme.
RETIREMENT BENEFITS BOND PAYMENT SCHEDULE 60.000 Number 50.227 49.266 49.882 49.471 50.000 47.257 43.066 42.615 40.000 37.455 37.250 34.415 31.750 30.000 29.929 20.246 20.000 14.301 10.000 8.946 4.695 2.338 608 444 0 Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
Conditions for implementing the contributory Pension Scheme State Participation in the System A commitment to ensure: The security of the resources accumulated in the Pension Funds. That worker members will receive the benefits established by the System in due time and manner. The relevant information. Existence of a Capital Market with safeguards to cover Pension Funds: A qualified supervisory and regulatory bodies for corporations, financial institutions, life insurance companies, risk-rating bodies, stock exchanges, securities custodians and other relevant agents. A well-developed risk-rating industry. Securities deposit companies (custody). Existence of an Insurance Industry.
The facts: 26 years later The Presidential Advisory Council for the Reform of the Pensions System reported in 2005: 1. The contributory pension scheme is working in accordance with how it was foreseen: The workers contributions are paid by their employers regularly. The PFA’s comply with their legal obligations. The contributors have their funds safe. Only in two years have the investments produced negative results. After being in place for 25 years no frauds have taken place nor has any PFA gone bankrupt.
2. For workers in stable employment, who pay their contributions regularly the length of their working life, the accumulated funds enable the financing of pensions close to the amount of their income during their active life.
3. The contributory pension scheme has also had positive effects in the national economy. It has contributed to the growth of the capital market, the electricity and telecommunications sectors and financing for housing and it has permitted the growth of the life insurance market. The Pension Funds have reached a figure around 75% of the GDP. This national long term savings resources makes it possible to finance productive long term investments. These effects are not only reflected in macroeconomic indicators, but also in things much closer to the people, such as the cost of mortgages, consumer credit and credits for small businesses.
4. Workers with low wages, temporary works, self employed and an important proportion of women are not able to accumulate sufficient funds. 5. Chile is getting older. Gradually but relentlessly, the old age people are representing an increasing percentage of the population. It is natural to ask how these additional years will be lived and the future of the young people.
Designing an integrated system The Reform covers totally the Pension System. The diagnosis that supports the changes reveals that the 3 pillars of the system were not responding to people’s needs. It was necessary to: > Fortify the Solidarity Pillar. > Introduce improvements to the Contributive Pillar. > Extend the benefits of the Voluntary Pillar. We took into consideration that The Pension System is one only, and what occurs in one Pillar will affect absolutely the others. Pension Systems
Pension Scheme before 2008’s Reform, excluding Pay as you go programs. Pillar 2 INDIVIDUAL CAPITALIZATION ACCOUNTS Pillar 3 VOLUNTARY Pillar 1 NON CONTRIBUTIVE Labor Market Capital Market Voluntary Pension Savings Public Budget Profitability Wages Tax Exemptions Employment Security Minimum Allowance Guarantee (20 years) Contributions Density Prices Products Supply Capital Non Contributive Pension (PASIS) PENSION PENSIÓN
More competence EducationFund Integrated Pension Scheme with Reform Pillar 2 INDIVIDUAL CAPITALIZATION ACCOUNTS Pillar 2 INDIVIDUAL CAPITALIZATION ACCOUNTS Pillar 3 VOLUNTARY Pillar 1 NON CONTRIBUTIVE Pillar 1 NON CONTRIBUTIVE Pillar 3 VOLUNTARY Labor Market Capital Market Voluntary Pension Savings Public Budget Self workers Mandatory contributions Investment Flexibility Basic Solidarity Pension Voluntary Pension Savings Subside Adjust Non Paid and Declared Contributions Solidarity Complement Collective Voluntary Savings Young Workers Incentives Child Birth Bond Capital PENSION
The reform creates a Solidarity Pension System that will benefit those who, for different reasons, have not been able to save enough funds to finance a dignified pension. The Reform will eliminate extreme poverty among older people and people with disabilities. NewBenefits: Basic Solidarity Pension (BSP) and Pension Solidarity Complement (PSC) for men and women ( ≥65 years old) The people lacking pension savings included in the 40% most vulnerable segment of the population were entitled to a Basic Solidarity Pension as of July 1, 2008. The coverage will be increased 5% per year, reaching 60% of the population in 2012 The pensioners were granted a Solidarity Pension Contribution allowing them to increase their income since 2008. The public contribution will be increased on a yearly basis until reaching its full value in 2012. Solidarity Pension System 17
Pension Reform will reduce the gender gap in the pension system. Without Reform 90% of women will not have access to the minimum allowance guarantee 2/3 of the benefits will be assigned to women BSP eligibility doesn't take into account the number of contributions (in years) Bond per Child for women. For each child born or adopted, a women will have the right to receive an amount equivalent to 18 contributions of a minimum wage, with profitability until she reaches 65 years old. In the long term will have an effect of a raise of 20% in pension amount if she contributes during 10 years a minimum wage, and has two children (average) Separate bidding process for disability and survival insurance. Gender Equity
Self employed: Compulsory Coverage • Independent workers (Self employed and Employer) are 27% of the workforce, 2/3 are Services Providers. • Equal rights and duties – Compulsory Contributions for Self employed Service Sectors. • Access to Basic Solidarity and Family Subsidies. • Independent workers will have access to Insurance for Injuries and Professional Illness. • Gradual implementation: • First step, Education Process. • Second step, begins in 2012, Completes Compulsory Contributions gradually until 2018.
Employment Formalizationand Subside to Pension Contributionof Young Workers • A subsidy to the first 24 contributions made by workers between 18 and 35 years of age whose income is lower than 1.5 times the established minimum wage. • The purpose of this subsidy is to promote labor participation among youths, increase employment with formal contracts and raise coverage and pension funds of young workers. • This subsidy will be made up of two kinds of contributions: A subsidy to hiring, equivalent to 50% of the contribution for a minimum wage, and a direct contribution to the worker’s pension fund account of the same amount. This instrument started to operate in October 2008, and will benefit about 300 thousand young workers in 2009.
More Competence and Corporate Governance in Pension Fund Market • Tender process for new affiliates. The new workers will be assigned, for up to 24 months to the Administrator that offers the lowest commission in the bidding process, which should lower the amount of the fees charged by the Pensions Funds Administrators. • Fixed Commissions Fixed commission on contributions, retirement and transfer of balances are eliminated in order to facilitate price comparison between pension fund managers. Management of Life Insurance and Invalidity Insurance is unbundled from fund management. A tender process being carried out for all affiliates, irrespective of the Administrators they are affiliated to. • Service outsourcing are allowed. • Entry of new administrators is expected.
Social Protection Network(PROTEGE) PROTEGE is the Social Protection Network of the Chilean Government, that seeks to provide security and opportunities. It is based on a set of eight programs and benefits (including the Solidarity Pension System) that meet the needs of people throughout their life cycle. The network is aimed at reducing vulnerability, creating opportunities for children and their families, fighting discrimination in all its forms, reducing inequality and improving social equity. http://www.redprotege.gov.cl/
Reasons why the Reform is a success • Population consensus public and private contributions. • Presidential Leadership: 10 final goals of the Reform. • Task Force (Ministers: Finance, Work, Planning) dedicated. The political leadership in the Minister of Work. • Law passed unanimously in Congress. • Funding secured in international reserves. • The role of the public administration is to accompany the exercising of rights. • Solid Technological Platform (monitoring on-line; 34 entities progressively integrates a common data model, digital forecast records)
Conclusions. • Pension systems affect the long term.The contributory pension scheme created in 1981 has not yet reached full maturity. • Ensure policy consistency and avoid reversals based on short term concerns • Gradual and stepwise approach to solving problems and think about long term effects • The contributory pension scheme is working in accordance with how it was foreseen and only within another 20 years will have matured sufficiently so as to reflect the majority of the pensioners. The system is transparent and prevents frauds. • The focus of Chilean Policy is the reduction of the risk of poverty in old age and the generating of minimum universal benefits, in an integrated Pension Scheme. • The identity of people, individual accounts of contributions and records of pensions have to interact to achieve confidence of all society in the Pension System.
Conclusions…cont’d • We established strong ways of education, communication and evaluation of the attention level and all the operational processes in the private and public sectors with the same quality standards audited by third parties and common database modeling. • The development of any pension system needs for macroeconomic stability and the contributory pension system helps to reach macroeconomic stability (savings, investment, employment, development of the capital market and insurance). • An essential condition is to separate the resources to cover the Retirement benefits. Everyone contributes to finance pensions, thru the individual savings and/or taxes (private and public financing). • In a Federal System like Nigeria, the three levels of Government must reach an agreement of how to reach a common goal of contributions and finance all the accrued pension liabilities
Sharing experiences The Chilean Pension System Rafael Del Campo Former National Director INP