180 likes | 309 Views
2010 BASHH NATIONAL RE-AUDIT ON SEXUAL HISTORY TAKING. A Sullivan, H McClean, C Carne, S Tayal, D Daniels September 2010 . Case note audit against standards and recommendations in the BASHH 2006 National Guidelines – consultations requiring sexual history-taking.
E N D
2010 BASHH NATIONAL RE-AUDIT ON SEXUAL HISTORY TAKING A Sullivan, H McClean, C Carne, S Tayal, D Daniels September 2010
Case note audit against standards and recommendations in the BASHH 2006 National Guidelines – consultations requiring sexual history-taking. Comparisons made to the baseline 2008 National Audit of Sexual History taking http://www.bashh.org/documents/84/84.pdf
Demographic data *from all 14 English BASHH regions and Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland , about 60% of all GU clinics
Auditable outcome measure: • The proportion of new/rebooked patients asked about the gender of their last sexual partner (target >95%)
Auditable outcome measure: • The proportion of new/rebooked patients asked about condom use at the last sexual intercourse (target >95%)
Anal sex and condom use – female heterosexual cases* *includes only those cases with documented heterosexuality
Auditable outcome measure: • New/rebooked patients should have comprehensive histories taken and legibly recorded (Target >90%) • GMC states: Wherever possible, you should offer a chaperone during an intimate examination
Offer of chaperone and legibility *Scotland
Auditable outcome: • An HIV risk assessment should be taken in all new/rebooked patients (>90%) • This is described in the Guidelines as having six components: three of these were re-audited
The Guidelines indicate all individuals should be asked about ‘problems or symptoms of last sexual partner’
Recommendations of 2008 Baseline Audit • Improve recording of the following areas of practice: • Offer of a chaperone • Condom usage • HIV risk assessment
Conclusions and next steps • Maintained high level of legibility - target met • Met target for recording sex of last partner • Improved in areas identified as being of concern from 2008 audit but fell short of target in all areas except for IVDU history in men • Regional Audit Chairs to identify clinics with significant improvements and any changes introduced and share best practice • Re-audit relevant key points at a local level