170 likes | 298 Views
ASP – BtB Analysis February, 2012. Agenda. Objective Call for Action, Why Now? ASP Landscape Current Challenges Key Benefits Next Steps. Objective. MD&D has made a recommendation for ASP to move into Phase 0 of BtB . This Phase would include LATHAM and ASP
E N D
ASP – BtB Analysis February, 2012
Agenda • Objective • Call for Action, Why Now? • ASP Landscape • Current Challenges • Key Benefits • Next Steps
Objective • MD&D has made a recommendation for ASP to move into Phase 0 of BtB. • This Phase would include LATHAM and ASP • Can ASP support going into Phase 0? • Phase 0 for ASP would start immediately
Call for Action, Why Now? • ASP Requires Action… • Non-validated ERP • ASP now Type 2 MRC • Disparate systems supporting critical business functions • Significant manual operations • Master Data inconsistencies • Lacking decision support analytics …& has a window of opportunity. • 2012 Start, 2013 Implementation • Next window of opportunity???
MD&D Global Mfg Deployment Playbook: Overview of Phase Details Verify & Deploy Engagement Strategy Functional Technical Market Initiation Project Preparation Business Blueprint Realization / Build Realization / Test Go-Live and Sustain Engagement Initiation Initial Project Planning SAP Landscape Design Definition Business Process Master List (BPML) Integration Testing Cutover Execution & Production Go-Live Process Workshops Project Initiation Fit Assessment Workshops Technical Design Specifications (TDS) Business Simulation Testing Hypercare IT Assessment Site Preparation User Requirement Specifications (URS) Build & Unit Test Development Objects Performance Testing Ongoing Support Data Assessment Project Impact Master Data Governance Data Conversion Build & Validation System Testing Data Conversion & Cleansing Plan Functional Unit Testing (FUT) User Acceptance Testing (UAT) Site Readiness Assessment Fit Assessment Preparation Compliance Assessment Business Process Designs (BPD) String Testing Final Preparation End User Training Functional Design Specifications (FDS) Error Handling Implementation planning Cutover Preparation End User Roles & Variants Confirmation Technical Security Business Case
Cost Reduction Benefits • Inventory carrying cost reduction • Estimate based on deployment of DP Tool $3.28MM inventory reduction and 3.73 DOS reduction. • Further investigation required for other savings attributed to the deployment of other Crossroads modules. • System retirement benefits • Retirement of Dataflo System $XX cost savings • Retirement of JDE in Medos $XX cost savings
Creative Brief Communication Plan Phase 0 Plan Template
Next Steps • Gil and Raj to align this deck with key internal stakeholders (Mike G, David A, Josh Stone, Lourdes R, Gloree, Bret) • Present final deck to Jim Bourne for alignment and approval (with SME need) from Management Board to participate in Phase 0 (business case) with LATAM • Jim B. to align with Chris Knerr on SME requirements for Phase 0 • Jim B. to align with ASP Board to support for ASP to proceed. • Approval to proceed into Phase 0
ASP Resources Requirements Full Time Resources Part-time Resources • Other individuals part time roles to support crossroads by function. • Plan, ExOps, Make, Finance, etc. • Any FTE at 50% would be moved to full-time on crossroads project.