1 / 11

Educational Service District No. 113

Educational Service District No. 113. Historical Election Analysis February 24, 2010. Discussion Topics. Election Results from February of 2010 Recent Bonds Results Historical Analysis of M&O Results Historical Analysis – M&O Approval Percentages. February 9, 2010 – Election Results.

margo
Download Presentation

Educational Service District No. 113

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Educational Service District No. 113 Historical Election Analysis February 24, 2010

  2. Discussion Topics • Election Results from February of 2010 • Recent Bonds Results • Historical Analysis of M&O Results • Historical Analysis – M&O Approval Percentages

  3. February 9, 2010 – Election Results Districts continue to receive strong support from voters: - M&O Levies: 163 are passing with only 1 failing - Capital Projects Levies: 31 are passing and only 1 is failing - Transportation Levies: All 4 are passing - Bond Authorizations: 7 are passing and 4 are failing (compared with 1 of 7 in February of 2009)

  4. February 9, 2010 – Election Results Many trends across the state continue: • In 2010, M&O Levies on the East side received a slightly higher percentage of yes votes than the West side: • Statewide Yes Votes: 63.35% • East Yes Votes: 64.51% • West Yes Votes: 62.44% • ESD 113 District: 61.05% • Since 2000, M&O Levies on the East side received a slightly higher percentage of yes votes than the West side: • Statewide Yes Votes: 65.47% • East Yes Votes: 66.21% • West Yes Votes: 65.47% • ESD 113 District: 66.13%* * When only even year elections are analyzed (majority of elections in ESD 113 are held in even years), the approval percentage is 63.50%, in line with West side even year results of 63.47%.

  5. Bond Election Results 2009-2010: East vs. West Western Washington Eastern Washington February 2009 March 2009

  6. Bond Election Results 2009-2010: East vs. West Western Washington Eastern Washington April 2009 May 2009 August 2009 November 2009

  7. Bond Election Results 2009-2010: East vs. West Western Washington Eastern Washington February 2010 TOTAL # of Issues # of Issues Passed

  8. Voting Trends – Bond Measures: East vs. West * Excludes Columbia (Stevens County), which received 35% yes votes.

  9. Historical M&O Results Trends across the state: • From 2000-2007, statewide approval of M&O Levies was approximately 66% • From 2008-2010, the M&O approval rate dropped to 63% (not concerning by itself). • However, there was a dramatic increase in the percentage of districts that are below 60%: • From 2000-2006: 16% • From 2008-2010: 34%* * Nearly 40% of Westside Districts had approval rates below 60%.

  10. Historical Results – The State, The East, The West and ESD 113

  11. Historical M&O Results – By Percent of Yes Votes Approval Percentages are sliding down

More Related