1 / 3

Powerpoint Abstract By Halford H. Fairchild September 16, 2010

Major, Brenda, Carnevale , Peter J.D., & Deaux , Kay. (1981). A different perspective on androgyny: Evaluations of masculine and feminine personality characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41 (5), 988-1001. Powerpoint Abstract By Halford H. Fairchild

mariah
Download Presentation

Powerpoint Abstract By Halford H. Fairchild September 16, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Major, Brenda, Carnevale, Peter J.D., & Deaux, Kay. (1981). A different perspective on androgyny: Evaluations of masculine and feminine personality characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(5), 988-1001. Powerpoint Abstract By Halford H. Fairchild September 16, 2010

  2. Abstract • Examined R’s evaluations of people who were portrayed as masculine, feminine, androgynous (both m&f) or undifferentiated (neither m&f). • Androgynous liked best and seen as most adjusted • Undifferentiated liked least and least adjusted. • M&F - midway

  3. Implications for Psych 104 • The set of items that assesses masculinity & femininity are crucial independent variables. • Should we add an “undifferentiated” category (“neither masculine nor feminine”) • We should know this literature – on masculinity/femininity

More Related