160 likes | 876 Views
Reed v. Reed , 404 U.S. 71 (1971). Changing Landscapes, Changed Women. The Reeds of Idaho. Cecil and Sally Reed adopts Richard “Skip” Lynn Reed Son suffers from mental disabilities Cecil Reed becomes increasingly violent Leaves family in 1958. Tragedy in Ada County.
E N D
Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971) Changing Landscapes, Changed Women
The Reeds of Idaho • Cecil and Sally Reed adopts Richard “Skip” Lynn Reed • Son suffers from mental disabilities • Cecil Reed becomes increasingly violent • Leaves family in 1958
Tragedy in Ada County • Cecil Reed returns when son reaches teenage years • Court awards father joint custody • On March 29, 1967, Skip commits suicide • Uses Cecil’s pistol, while visiting father
Ada County Probate Court • Sally Reed files to become administrator of son’s estate • Cecil Reed files rival petition • Probate Court grants Cecil the administrative privileges • Section 15-314 of Idaho Law Code read: “Of several persons claiming wholly and equally entitled to administer, males must be preferred to females, and relatives of the whole to those of the half blood.”
First Appeal • Sally Reed’s attorney refuses to help her appeal • Allen Derr, a Boise lawyer, agrees to help her • Likely loss in higher court • Case appealed to the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District • Derr argues that Fourteenth Amendment was violated: “States cannot ‘deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws’” • Court rules in favor of Sally Reed
Idaho Supreme Court • In 1970, Cecil Reed appeals District Court decision to Idaho Supreme Court • Court reverses lower court’s decision on two premises • Men are better suited than women for executive duties: “The legislature when it enacted this statute obviously concluded that in general men are better qualified to act as an administrator than are women.” • 15-314 saved courts from additional, unnecessary hearings • Men could immediately be chosen as administrators
Headed to Washington • Sally Reed appeals to U.S. Supreme Court • Court agrees to hear case • Discouraging Supreme Court precedents • Bradwell v. Illinois 83 U.S. 130 (1873) • Court upheld state regulation barring women from practicing law • Hoyt v. Florida, 368 U.S. 57 (1961) • Court upheld law barring women from owning bars
Supreme Court Arguments • Sally Reed and Derr joined by emerging attorney, Ruth Bader Ginsberg • Supreme Court’s two approaches to “Equal Protection” cases: • Does law have “rational state basis?” • Are “subject classes” involved? • e.g., African-Americans • Women were not yet considered to be a subject class
The Ruling • Justices unanimously vote in favor of Sally Reed • 15-314 did not have a rational state basis: • “To give a mandatory preference to members of either sex over members of the other, merely to accomplish the elimination of hearings on the merits, is to make the very kind of arbitrary legislative choice forbidden by the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment” • The Idaho Supreme Court’s decision reversed • 15-314 declared unconstitutional
Aftermath of Ruling • Stirs turbulent era of women’s rights • First major case in which the Supreme Court legitimizes legal protection of women’s rights as citizens • Missing points in court’s decision • Women are not declared a “subject class” • Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976) • Laws against women examined with “heightened scrutiny”
Bibliography "BRADWELL v. ILLINOIS," The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, accessed November 16, 2013, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1851-1900/1872/1872_0. "HOYT v. FLORIDA," The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, accessed November 15, 2013, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_31. "Kahn v. Shevin." Casebriefsummary.com. N.p., 8 Nov. 2012. Web. <http://www.casebriefsummary.com/kahn-v-shevin/>. Martin, Emily. "Reed v. Reed at 40: A Landmark Decision." National Women's Law Center. November 16, 2011. Accessed November 16, 2013. http://www.nwlc.org/our-blog/reed-v-reed-40-landmark-decision. Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971) (November 22, 1971) (Legal Information Institute, Cornell University Law School, Dist. file). Reed v. Reed, 465 P. 2d 635 (February 11, 1970) (Google Scholar, Dist. file). "Reed v. Reed 1971." Supreme Court Drama: Cases That Changed America. N.p.: n.p., 2001. U.S. History in Context. Web. 16 Nov. 2013. <http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/uhic/ReferenceDetailsPage/ReferenceDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=UHIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&mode=view&displayGroupName=Reference&limiter=&currPage=&disableHighlighting=false&displayGroups=&sortBy=&source=&search_within_results=&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE|CX3457000128&userGroupName=oldt1017&jsid=8849bcf948670e55fa09de8acf2aa6b2>
Images Used Allen Derr and Ruth Bader Ginsberg. N.d.Photograph. Boisestatepublicradio.org. Boise State Public Radio, 2013. Web. 24 Nov. 2013. Burger Court (1970-1971). 1971. Photograph. IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. Web. 24 Nov. 2013. Supreme Court Building, Washington, DC, USA. Front Facade. N.d. Photograph. Geolocation.ws. Geolocation, 10 Feb. 2011. Web. 25 Nov. 2013. The Home of Sally Reed. N.d. Photograph. Josh Blackman's Blog. Joshblackman.com, 11 June 2013. Web. 24 Nov. 2013.