1 / 24

Effect of Economic Crisis on Estonian Industrial Relations System

Effect of Economic Crisis on Estonian Industrial Relations System. Final conference of the project „The economic crisis impact on industrial relations national systems: Policy responses as key recovery tools“. Kerly Espenberg University of Tartu Centre for Applied Social Science s

mariel
Download Presentation

Effect of Economic Crisis on Estonian Industrial Relations System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Effect of Economic Crisison EstonianIndustrial Relations System Final conference of the project „The economic crisis impact on industrial relations national systems: Policy responses as key recovery tools“ Kerly Espenberg University of Tartu Centre for Applied Social Sciences 15 November 2012

  2. Outline of thepresentation • Some facts about Estonia, UT, CASS • Estonian industrial relations system • Economic crisis and its impact on industrial relations in Estonia • Challenges Research methodology • Desk analysis (previous studies, media, statistics) • Interviews (about 15) • National debate (in October)

  3. Somefactsabout Estonia, UT and CASS ESTONIA • Total population 1.34 mln • GDP per capita in PPS (EU27=100, 2010): 64 UNIVERSITY OF TARTU • Founded in 1632 • Estonia’s leading centre of research and training • Research focuses on subjects as diverse as medicine and philosophy, genetics and computer science CENTRE FOR APPLIED SOCIAL SCIENCES • Established in 2007 • Mission: to offer society high-quality applied research and analyses in social sciences. • The purpose of CASS is to raise the relative importance of sustainable strategic planning based on knowledge in society. • CASS is the network-type knowledge organisation and co-operation division in the University of Tartu.

  4. Estonian industrial relations system.State-level dialogue STATE (MinistryofSocialAffairs) EMPLOYERS EMPLOYEES

  5. Estonian industrial relations system.Sector-level dialogue • Weakly developed: in 2000s sector-level collective agreements signed in transportation and health care

  6. Estonian industrial relations system.Organization-level dialogue • Dual employees representation system A trustee is an employee of an employer who is elected by a general meeting of the employees of the employer to represent the employees in the performance of the duties arising from law in relations with the employer. • A collective agreement generally applies to all the employers and employees belonging to the organisations that are parties to the agreement unless otherwise provided by the agreement • The exact number of trade unions and federations of trade unions in Estonia is not known (there are appr. 270 trade unions and approximately 40? federations of trade unions registered in the Estonian NGOs and Foundations’ registry)

  7. Estonian industrial relations system.Legislation

  8. Estonian industrial relations system.Tradeunionmembership • Trade union membership rather low (appr. 8%) • Most of collective agreements are signed on company level • Appr. 6% of companies have signed collective agreements • Third of all workers are covered by collective agreements

  9. Estonian industrial relations system. Advantagesofcollectiveagreements(Espenberg et al 2012) • For employer and employees • Cooperative relationships, involvement • Clarifying laws • In the public sector an argument used when negotiating about state funding • For employees • Higher security • Better working conditions, benefits • More power when negotiation collectively • For employer • Motivated employees • Lower administrative costs • Higher security (no strikes)

  10. Estonian industrial relations system.Reasonsforlow number ofcollectiveagreements(Espenberg et al 2012) • Society level • Lack of traditional industrial relations system • Low support to the development of the industrial relations by the state • Nature of the collective agreements • Relations between employees and the employer • Low flexibility, decreasing flexibility in management • Administrative burden to the employer • Organization level • Low awareness • Negative attitude towards the need of collective agreements • Low activity of the employees’ representatives

  11. Economiccrisis

  12. Economiccrisis • Lay-offs, increaseinunemploymentrate • Structuralemploymentduetothefiring a large number of workers with a relatively low level of education in the construction and industrial sector at the beginning of the crisis. • There was a lack of highly qualified skilled workers, such as engineers, who could have helped develop own production and find new markets in replacement of those that were lost

  13. Economiccrisis • Lay-offs, increase in unemployment rate • Wage cuts, non-paid leave • Decrease in working hours • Wage cuts → The bargaining power of employees decreased because during the crisis the main aim was to maintain the job

  14. Problemsfacedduringthecrisis • High youth unemployment rate

  15. Problemsfacedduringthecrisis.State-leveldialogue State abandoned several agreements made withthe social partners • Labourcontractsact (flexicurity) • Enteredintoforcein 1 July 2009 (planned 1 January 2010) • Security package agreed. • 20 percentage point increase in the unemployment insurance in the initial stage of unemployment, and a 10 percentagepointincrease from the 101st until the 360th day of unemployment → at firstpostponed and thenabandoned • 40% unemployment insurance benefit guaranteed to those quitting their job upon agreement or at their own initiative→ abandoned • Increasein the unemployment to 50% of the national minimum wage→ postponeduntil 2013

  16. Problemsfacedduringthecrisis.State-leveldialogue Involvement of the social partners to decision making lacking or rather formal • Government’s decision to include the reserves of the Unemployment Insurance Fund and the Health Insurance Fund in the state budget • Increase in unemployment insurance premium • Amendments to the termination of collective agreements under the Collective Agreements Act

  17. Problemsfacedduringthecrisis.Sector-leveldialogue • Teachers’ strike • 7-9 March 2012 • Main claim of the strikers: increase in minimum wage of teachers by 20% • 682 educational institutions (17,234 educational workers: 10,000 teachers and 7,000 other educational sector employees) • Support strikes were organised: members of health care, transportation, cultural and other associations and unions participated in support strikes. • Simultaneously with the strike of educational personnel, the Estonian Trade Union Confederation organised a support strike in which a total of 7,000 workers participated (including over 4,000 health care workers, approximately 1,500 members of the Intellectuals Union, 800 transportation workers, 400 energy workers and over 200 railway workers). • Overall, 20 strikes were organised in Estonia in support of the requests of teachers and EAKL. Furthermore, pickets, strike meetings and demonstrations were arranged in several places

  18. Problemsfacedduringthecrisis.Sector-leveldialogue • Teachers’ strike outcomes. The draft that changes the wage system is in the process of receiving feedback and comments • From January 2013 the average wage for teachers willincrease to 840 EUR (in 2011 793 EUR) and the minimum wage to 700 EUR (right now 608 EUR). • In addition, 20% of additional funds will be given to schools that can be used for developing the motivational and wage policy system by the principal

  19. Problemsfacedduringthecrisis.Sector-leveldialogue • Medical workers’ strike • Doctors and medical care workers • 1-26 October 2012 • Main request of the strikers: 20% wage increase for the doctors, more than 40% for nurses and medical care workers (the offer of the Estonian Hospitals Association before the strike: 6.6% wage increase for all). • Also: decrease in workload • Supported by teachers, family doctors, Estonian doctors in Finland and Sweden, rescue workers, railwaymen, power engineers, public sector workers (ca 16,600 persons)

  20. Problemsfacedduringthecrisis.Sector-leveldialogue • Medical workers’ strike: results (increase of minimum hourly wage)

  21. Problemsfacedduringthecrisis.Sector-leveldialogue • From 2013 the doctors-residents will be paid for full-time work • The workload of doctors and nurses will be decreased 20% in outpatient and 16% in-patient work

  22. Problemsfacedduringthecrisis.Organisation-leveldialogue • Decrease in number of collective agreements signed • Not always the collective agreements were followed

  23. Positive aspects • Teachers’ and doctor’sstrikes have raised discussion about industrial relations (incl. the role of the trade unions and collective agreements) in society • Ministry of Social Affairs has started to overlook the industrial relations’ regulations in cooperation with the state-level social partners

  24. Challenges For state: • Recovering the trust of the employees’representatives • Overlooking laws For trade unions: • Better communication of their role in society For employers: • ? Thank you for your attention! Kerly Espenberg kerly.espenberg@ut.eehttp://ec.ut.ee/rake Centre for Applied Social Sciences CASS

More Related