E N D
1. 1 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. Exploring the overlap between children with SLI and children with ADHD
2. 2 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. Overview Overlap between SLI and ADHD
Executive functions in SLI with(out) ADHD symptoms
Semantics/pragmatics in SLI with(out) ADHD symptoms
Conclusion and discussion
3. 3 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. SLI Diagnosis
?Exclusion
?Severity
4. 4 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. ADHD Diagnosis
?Symptoms (division in subtypes)
-present before 7 years of age
-present in 2 or more settings
-significant impairment in functioning
-not accounted for by another disorder
5. 5 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. SLI and ADHD Not just two different worlds..
? overlapping symptoms
6. 6 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. SLI and behavioural problems 23% of 200 children with (S)LI
scored in the atypical range of
the ADHD scale of the SDQ
These children performed worse
in expressive language tasks with
semantic content
? underlying problems with inhibition?
7. 7 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. ADHD and language problems Subtle problems in language comprehension
More robust problems in language production
? mainly pragmatics
8. 8 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. Possible explanation Executive Dysfunction Theory
We theorize that the core behavioural symptoms of ADHD (
) and the pragmatic difficulties that these children exhibit (
) are related to deficits in executive function (i.e. higher-order cognitive processes).
9. 9 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. This study Is it possible, within a SLI group, to distinguish a group of children with ADHD symptoms and a group of children without ADHD symptoms?
If so, is it possible to differentiate these groups with respect to:
1: Executive functions?
2: Semantics/pragmatics?
10. 10 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. Subjects 15 children diagnosed with SLI
-13 boys, 2 girls
-mean age 8;2
11. 11 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. Groups Dutch checklist for behavioural problems: VvGK
33% of 15 children with SLI
scored in the (sub)clinical range of
the inattention and/or hyperactivity
scales of the VvGK
12. 12 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. 1a: Inhibition CANTAB Stop Signal Task
13. 13 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. 1b: Attention CANTAB Rapid Visual Information Processing
14. 14 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. 1c: Working memory CANTAB Spatial Working Memory
15. 15 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. 1d: Shifting CANTAB Intra/extradimensional Shift
16. 16 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. Summary: executive functions No differentiation between SLI group with and SLI group without ADHD symptoms on measures of:
-inhibition
-attention
-working memory
-shifting
17. 17 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. 2a: Semantics Dutch childrens communication checklist: CCC-2-NL
18. 18 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. 2b: Pragmatics Dutch childrens communication checklist: CCC-2-NL
19. 19 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. 2c: Coherence Dutch childrens communication checklist: CCC-2-NL
20. 20 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. Summary; semantics/pragmatics
21. 21 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. Conclusion
22. 22 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. Discussion An overlapping subgroup?
23. 23 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. Further research Main study:
Comparison of language profiles and cognitive profiles of children with ADHD, children with SLI, and normally developing children
3 groups of 30 children, 7-8 years old, match on IQ, age and gender.
*Language: Frog, NWR, ZIT, CCC-2-NL
*Efs (inhibitie, werkgeheugen, planning, flexibiliteit, vloeiendheid)
*Aandacht en controle taken
The relationship between performance on cognitive tasks and language performance should be thus illuminated. The profile of ADHD children in language can be compared with the other groups of children in order to be able to identify possible specific features and the relationship of these features to their cognitive abilities.
-Specific language features in ADHD and in SLI
-Does language of ADHD differ from language of SLI?
-Does language of ADHD+LI differ from language of SLI?
-Does language of ADHD+LI differ from language of SLI+ADHD symptoms?
-And the relation with cognitive abilities in ADHD and in SLI?
-Unique language profile in ADHD? LI primary or secondary?
-Fit Executive Dysfunction Theory?3 groups of 30 children, 7-8 years old, match on IQ, age and gender.
*Language: Frog, NWR, ZIT, CCC-2-NL
*Efs (inhibitie, werkgeheugen, planning, flexibiliteit, vloeiendheid)
*Aandacht en controle taken
The relationship between performance on cognitive tasks and language performance should be thus illuminated. The profile of ADHD children in language can be compared with the other groups of children in order to be able to identify possible specific features and the relationship of these features to their cognitive abilities.
-Specific language features in ADHD and in SLI
-Does language of ADHD differ from language of SLI?
-Does language of ADHD+LI differ from language of SLI?
-Does language of ADHD+LI differ from language of SLI+ADHD symptoms?
-And the relation with cognitive abilities in ADHD and in SLI?
-Unique language profile in ADHD? LI primary or secondary?
-Fit Executive Dysfunction Theory?
24. 24 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. Information
E: e.m.parigger@uva.nl
W: http://home.medewerker.uva.nl/e.m.parigger
T: 0031-20-5253811
Uploaden hand-out website. Uploaden hand-out website.
25. 25 Esther Parigger. 14-07-07. Theory of constructive operators (TCO)