250 likes | 816 Views
Chapter 7 Social Process and Crime. Introduction. Social process theory traditions ▪ Differential association/social learning ▪ Adequate socialization toward the incorrect norms and values ▪ Informal social control ▪ Inadequate socialization ▪ Labeling theory
E N D
Introduction Social process theory traditions ▪ Differential association/social learning ▪ Adequate socialization toward the incorrect norms and values ▪ Informal social control ▪ Inadequate socialization ▪ Labeling theory ▪ Socialized to accept delinquent identity as result of criminal justice system
Introduction (2 of 4) Socialization ▪ How a person learns the “proper” way to live ▪ Includes norms and values that guide human behavior ▪ Primary sources: social institutions ▪ Education ▪ Religion ▪ Family ▪ Peer group
Introduction (3 of 4) Foundations ▪ Chicago School theorists ▪ Social disorganization theory ▪ Cultural transmission: differential association and social learning (improper socialization) ▪ Informal social control: control theories (inadequate socialization) ▪ Behaviorism ▪ Operant conditioning ▪ Role modeling
Differential Association and Social Learning Theory ▪ Primary groups and significant others influence individual behavior Theories: 1. Laws of imitation (Tarde) 2. Differential association (Sutherland) 3. Social learning (Akers)
Laws of Imitation (1 of 2) ▪ Developed by Gabriel Tarde ▪ Rejected the idea of the born criminal ▪ Criminality as lifestyle learned through interaction with and imitation of others
Laws of Imitation (2 of 2) ▪ Criminality as a function of association with criminal types ▪ People are more likely to imitate one another if they are in close contact. ▪ Inferiors imitate superiors. ▪ When two fashions come together, one can be substituted for the other.
Differential Association (1 of 3) ▪ Developed by Edwin Sutherland ▪ Focus on cultural transmission of delinquent values ▪ Akers was student (and later a professor) at the University of Chicago • Asks a “Chicago School” question
Differential Association (3 of 3) ▪ Criticism ▪ Vague concepts and phrasings ▪ Difficult to test empirically
Differential Association • Criminal Behavior is learned • Negatively, this means it is not “invented” • Communication within intimate groups • Learning involves techniques and attitudes • Attitudes expresses as “definitions of the situation” • A person becomes delinquent because of an “excess of definitions favorable to law violation” • The process involves the same learning process as all other behavior
Techniques of Neutralization(1 of 3) ▪ Developed by Sykes and Matza ▪ First good attempt to measure Sutherland’s “definitions” • Documented common rationalizations for delinquency among a sample of delinquents
Techniques of Neutralization (2 of 3) ▪ Denial of responsibility ▪ Denial of injury ▪ Denial of victim ▪ Condemnation of the condemners ▪ Appeal to higher loyalties
Techniques of Neutralization (3 of 3) Definitions or Something Else?? ▪ Such attitudes do not actually cause criminal behavior. ▪ Rationalization is utilized only after the offense is committed when behavior is called into question. ▪ Behaviorist: To the extent that these rationalizations neutralize guilt, they reinforce behavior (Negative Reinforcement)
Social Learning Theory(1 of 11) ▪ Developed by Ronald Akers ▪ Early version: differential reinforcement ▪ Revision of differential association theory ▪ Added concepts of operant conditioning and imitation (observational learning)
Social Learning Theory(2 of 11) Key concepts ▪ Differential associations ▪ Definitions ▪ Differential reinforcement ▪ Imitation
Social Learning Theory (Akers) Exposure to definitions or different role models Balance of definitions or role models produces initial behaviors Positive or negative reinforcement Definitions Behaviors Role models R(+/-) DA
Social Learning Theory(9 of 11) ▪ Empirical research measures ▪ Attitudes that support crime (definitions) ▪ Exposure to delinquent peers/family members (differential associations) ▪ Rewards or punishment for delinquency (differential reinforcement)
Social Learning Theory(10 of 11) ▪ Empirical research findings ▪ Strong relationships between measures of social learning and a wide range of outcomes ▪ Smoking ▪ Computer crimes ▪ Gang-related delinquency ▪ Other forms of criminal or delinquent activity
Social Learning Theory(11 of 11) ▪ Studies ▪ Techniques of neutralization ▪ Delinquent peer association ▪ Role of reinforcement
Delinquent Peer Association ▪ Most common measure of social learning theory ▪ Connection between the proportion of person’s friends who were delinquent and delinquency ▪ Nonsocial learning interpretation ▪ Delinquent youths attract one another as peers ▪ Supported by National Youth Survey ▪ Peers have a causal influence on future behavior
Role of Reinforcement ▪ When rewards outweigh punishments, certain types of behavior will result. ▪ Deterrence (formal punishment) could be absorbed into social learning theory.
Social Learning Theory Criticism ▪ Unclear the exact role that delinquent peers and delinquent attitudes play in generating delinquency and crime
Policy Implications:Social Learning Theory ▪ Use the principles of learning to ▪ Reduce access to delinquent peers ▪ Confront and change antisocial attitudes ▪ Change the balance of reinforcement so that it supports prosocial behavior ▪ Behavioral/cognitive restructuring programs