1 / 32

Bahçeşehir University Social Science Institutions Ph D. Business Program Management & Organization Organizational Th

Bahçeşehir University Social Science Institutions Ph D. Business Program Management & Organization Organizational Theory Prof. Dr. Atilla DİCLE. Decision Making Prep. by: İlhan ÇİFTÇİ.

maris
Download Presentation

Bahçeşehir University Social Science Institutions Ph D. Business Program Management & Organization Organizational Th

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bahçeşehir University Social Science Institutions Ph D. Business Program Management & Organization Organizational Theory Prof. Dr. Atilla DİCLE Decision Making Prep. by: İlhan ÇİFTÇİ

  2. Decision – Making is a indivual or corporate selection for future results. Sometimes It is difficult to choose a way that uncertanity sistuations. • The cognitive process of reaching a decision. • A position or opinion or judgment reached after consideration. • Choosing between alternative courses of action using cognitive processes - memory, thinking, evaluation, etc. • The process of mapping the likely consequences of decisions, working out the importance of individual factors, and choosing the best course of action to take. Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  3. Decision Mistakes and Learning- I

  4. Decision Mistakes and Learning- II

  5. Decision Mistakes and Learning- III

  6. Decision Mistakes and Learning- IV

  7. Decision Mistakes and Learning- V

  8. Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  9. Decision Making Comlexity Categories Programmed Non Programmed • Repetitive and well defined • Procedures exist • Criteria of performance are normally clear • Good information about performance is available • Alternatives are easily specified • Novel and poorly defined • No procedure exist • It is used when an organization has not seen a problem before and may not know how to respond • Clear – cut Decision criteria do not exist. • Alternatives fuzzy

  10. Individual Decision Making Individual Decision Making can be described in two ways: Rational Approach: It is suggested that, how Managers should try to make decisions. This is an ideal managers may work toward but never reach. Bounded Rationality Approach: It describes how decisions actually have to be made under severe time and resource constraints. Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  11. Decision Making Parts Problem Identification: Information about enviromental and organizational conditions is monitored to determine if performance is satisfactory and to diagnose the cause of shortcomings. Problem Solution: Stage is when alternative courses of action are considered and one alternative is selected and implemented. • Definition: • Organizational Decision making as the process of identifying and solving problems. It has 2 major parts: • Problem Identification • Problem Solution Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  12. Individual Decision Making Rational Approach • RATIONAL APPROACH • Ratiıonal Approach model is an ideal not fully achievable in the real world of uncertanity, complexity, and rapid change. • This model help managers think about decisions more clearly and rationally. • It ensures make better decisions even when there is a lack of clear information. • It has broken 8 steps and illustrated left side . Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  13. Monitor the Decision Enviroment Rational Approach Manager monitor Internal and External Informatipon that will indicate deviations from planned or acceptable behavior. Financial Statements Performance Evaluation Industry Incides Competitors Activities So forth. Manager Reviews Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  14. Define the Decision Problem Rational Approach Problem determination phases Who was affected, Who was involved Where, when occur How current activities influenced Specify Decision Objectives The manager determines what performance outcomes should be achieved by a decision. Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  15. Diagnose the Problem Rational Approach The manager digs below the surface to analyse the cause of the problem. Additional data might be gathered to facilitate this diagnosis. Develop Alternative Solutions Before amanager can move ahead with decisive action plan, he or she must have a clear understanding of the various options avaliable to achieve desired objectives. The manager may seek ideas and suggestions from other people. Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  16. Evaluate Alternatives Rational Approach This step may involve the use of statistical techniques or personnel experience to measure the probability of success. Choose The Best Alternative This step is CORE of the decision process. The manager uses his/her analysis of the problem, objectives, and alternatives to select a single alternative that has the best chance for success. Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  17. Implement the Chosen Alternative Rational Approach Finally, the manager uses managerial, administrative and persuasive abilities and gives directions to ensure that the decision is carried out. The monitoring activity begins again as soon as the solution implemented. • RESULT of Rational Approach Model • First 4 step is related to problem identification and other 4 step is problem solution. • 8 steps are integrated and can not be applied solely. • Deviations from the Rational Approaches are explained by the bounded rationallity perspective. Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  18. Individual Decision Making Bounded Rationality Perspective Managerial Decision Makings shows that, managers are unable to follow an ideal procedure. Rational Approach Model could not be worked with unideal cases. Time contstraints, internal and external factors, ill defined process lead to many decisions must be made very quickly. Managers have only so much time and mental capacity and, hence, cannot evaluate every goal, problem and alternative. Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  19. Constraints and Tradeoffs Not only are large organizational decisions too complex to fully comprehend, but several other constraints impinge (vurmak, çarpmak) on the decision maker. Corporate culture and ethical values also influence decision makings. Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  20. The Role of Intution The bounded rationally perspective is often associated with intuitive decision process. In intutive decision making, experience and judgement rather than sequential logic or explicit reasoning are used to make decisions. Intution is not arbitrary or irrational because it is based on years of practise and hands on experience, often stored in the subconscious. (bilinçaltı) Intution plays an increasingly important role in problem identification in today’s fast – paced and uncertain business enviroment. A study of manager problem finding showed that thirty of thirty – three problems were ambiguosu and ill defined. Managers may walk a fine line between two extremes: on the one hand, making arbitrary decisions without careful study, and on the other, rkying obsessively (saplantılı) on numbers and rational analysis. Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  21. Constraints and Tradeoffs during Nonprogrammed Decision Making Decision/Choice Search for a high – quality decision alternative Bounded Rationality: Limited time, information, resources to deal with complex, multidimensinal issues Personal Costraints: Personel desire for prestige, success; personal decision style; and the desire to satisfy emotional needs, cope with pressure, maintain self - concept Organizational Constraints: Level of: agreement, shared perspective, cooperation, or support; corporate culture and structure, ethical values. Samuel F.B. Morse Invented the Telegraph with a lots of Tradeoffs Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  22. Organizational Decision Making Today’s managers amd organizations are dealing with a higher percentage of non programmed decisions because of rapidly changing business environmet.

  23. Organizational Decision Making Decisions are made about organization strategy, structure, innovation and acqusitions. Executive Management interests long maturity strategic decisions and related to whole business, middle level management interests the applications middle and short maturities and others interest the very shot applications. This situation is shown best organization decision making structure. Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  24. Organizational Decision Making The process by which decisions are made in organizations are influenced by a number of factors, particularly the organization’s own internal structures and the degree of stability or instability of the external enviroment. It seperates four primary tyoes Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  25. Organizational Decision Making Management Sicence Approach The management Science Approach to Organizational Decision Making is the anlog to the rational approach by individual managers. Success Conditions • Problems analyzable • Variables identifies • Measurable • Ignore human judgement • Qualitative factors can not be considered such as competitor reactions, consumer tastes, product warmth Weakness Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  26. Organizational Decision Making Carnegie Model • Carnegie – Mellon University academic research helped formulate the bounded rationality approach to individual decision making, as well as provide new insights about organizational decisions. • Research by The Group indicated that, organization level, decisions involved many managers and that a final choice was based on a colalition among those managers. • Management coalitions are needed during decision making fro two reasons. • Organizational Goals are often Ambiguous, and operative goals of deparments are often inconsistent • Human cognitive Limitations Instead of Optimize Problem Solution, satisfice is used Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  27. Organizational Decision Making Incremental Decision Process Model • Twenty five Decisions made in organizations and • traced the events associated with these decisions from • Beginning to end. • One importance is that major organization choice are • Usually a serises of small choices that combine to produce the major decision. • Based on this approach three major decisions are • important: - Identification • - Development • - Selection Henry Mintzberg and his associates in MCGill University develop this. Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  28. Organizational Decision Making • Garbage Can Model • This Model is not Directly comparable to the earlier • models, bcs the garbage can model deals with the • Pattern or flow of multiple decisions within • Organizations. It ensures that and help us think of the whole organiztion and the frequent decisions begin made by • managers throughout. • The unique characteristic of the garbage can model is • that the decision process is not seen as a sequence of steos that begins with a problem end with a solution. • Indeed, problem identification and problem solution may not be • connected to each other, An idea may be proposed as a solution • when no problem is specified, A Problem may exist and never generate • A solution and so forth. James March and his collegous developed the Organized Anarchy Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  29. Organizational Decision Making Problems Potential Solutions Identification Participants Coalition Development Choice Opportunities Ambiguous Selection Satisfice rather than optimize Measurablity

  30. Organizational & Individual Decision Making Individual Decision Making Organizational Decision Making • Single Manager • Individual , a single view point • Intangible and tangible results are more common. • Affects the person and close familiy. • Generally take a decision is faster than corporation and implementation is interested more narrow enviroment. • Several Manager • May Departments play a role for problem identifiaction and solutuin, multiple view point • Tangible Results only • Affects corporate identity, shareholders, stakeholders, investors etc. Decision Making

  31. Some of The Successful Decision Owners Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

  32. Questions and Explanations Bahçeşehir University - Organizational Theory

More Related