390 likes | 624 Views
The Mined Landscape. FLORIDA SWAMP FOREST ARRANGED BY INCREASING WATER AND NUTRIENT FLOWS BAYHEADS? CYPRESS DOMES? CYPRESS STRANDS? FLOODPLAIN FORESTS . BAYHEADS=BAY TREESCYPRESS DOMES=POND CYPRESS, SWAMP BLACKGUMCYPRESS STRANDS=BALD CYPRESS, WATER TUPELOFLOODPLAIN FOREST, MIXED SWAMPS (CENTRAL FLORIDA)FLORIDA ELM, WATER HICKORY, BALD CYPRESS, OAKFLOODPLAIN FOREST, MIXED SWAMPS (NORTH FLORIDA)RIVER BIRCH, BITTERNUT HICKORY, CHESTNUT OAKBALD CYPRESS.
E N D
1. Matching Tree Species to Site Conditionsin Phosphate Clay Settling Areas Betty Rushton, Ph.D.
and Mary Paulic This presentation is the result of a five year study. Mary Paulic kept the project going for an additional two years and some of the results presented here are from her publications.
This presentation is the result of a five year study. Mary Paulic kept the project going for an additional two years and some of the results presented here are from her publications.
2. The Mined Landscape
3. FLORIDA SWAMP FORESTARRANGED BY INCREASING WATER AND NUTRIENT FLOWSBAYHEADS? CYPRESS DOMES? CYPRESS STRANDS? FLOODPLAIN FORESTS
BAYHEADS=BAY TREES
CYPRESS DOMES=POND CYPRESS, SWAMP BLACKGUM
CYPRESS STRANDS=BALD CYPRESS, WATER TUPELO
FLOODPLAIN FOREST, MIXED SWAMPS (CENTRAL FLORIDA)
FLORIDA ELM, WATER HICKORY, BALD CYPRESS, OAK
FLOODPLAIN FOREST, MIXED SWAMPS (NORTH FLORIDA)
RIVER BIRCH, BITTERNUT HICKORY, CHESTNUT OAK
BALD CYPRESS
4. EXPERIMENT #1TO DETERMINE SUCESSIONAL SEQUENCE AND DOCUMENT COMMUNITY STRUCTUREMEASURED VEGETATION & CALCULTED IMPORTANCE VALUES FOR 5-15 QUADRATS IN INDIVIDUAL CLAY SETTLING AREA NESTED QUADRATS ACROSS SIX 10-20 YEAR OLD SITES
NESTED QUADRATS ACROSS SIX 25-35 YEAR OLD SITES
5. Typical 25 to 35 year old clay settling area BETTY_R:
We would plot a compass course across the clay settling area and take measurements every 100 to 200 meters depending on the size of the area.
We did not measure vegetation on the spoil piles seen here in the near foreground with the trees
BETTY_R:
We would plot a compass course across the clay settling area and take measurements every 100 to 200 meters depending on the size of the area.
We did not measure vegetation on the spoil piles seen here in the near foreground with the trees
6. WILLOWS IN YOUNGER SITES 10 TO 20 YEARS SINCE DECOMISSIONED
7. OLDER WILLOW SITE NOTE FALLEN TREES AND RESPROUTS
8. Drier Site covered in vines
9. Wet Site covered in cattails
10. VEGETATION ANALYSISDivided into Moisture Classes* 40 quadrats in 10 to 20 year old sites
60 quadrats in 25 to 35 year old sites
*Fish and Wildlife National Wetland Inventory List
11. A few sites had some pretty nice trees when a seed source was nearby 35 year old clay pond at Alderman Ford Ranch
12. Trees Organized by Seed Availability
13. Wetland Forest in Florida Compared to Trees Colonizing Clay PondsTrees also found in clay settling ponds* Bay Swamps
sweet bay
swamp bay
loblolly bay
Mixed Swamps
cabbage palm
pop ash
Florida elm*
Bald cypress
water hickory
water locus
black tupelo Cypress Domes
pond cypress
black gum
Habitat Generalists
water oak*
sweetgum*
live oak
hackberry*
laurel cherry*
laurel oak*
red maple*
14. Energy Diagram H. T. Odum Style
15. EXPERIMENT #2 BREAKING ARRESTED SUCCESSION BY PLANTING SEEDLINGS IN CLAY PONDS Compare three floodplain species
Compare pond vs bald cypress
Compare bare root vs tubelings
Compare different reclamation methods
16. FLOODPLAIN SPECIES GREEN ASH, BALD CYPRESS AND SWAMP TUPELO
17. MEASURING TREE SEEDLINGS GREEN ASH (LEFT) BALD CYPRESS (RIGHT)
18. COMPARISON OF FLOODPLAIN BAREROOT SPECIES SURVIVAL (%)AFTER TWO YEARS
19. BAREROOT VS TUBELINGS SUVIVAL (%) BALD CYPRESSAFTER TWO YEARS
20. POND VS BALD CYPRESS TUBELING SURVIVAL (%)AFTER TWO YEARS
21. Reclamation Types sand cap and sand/clay mix compared to unaltered clay areas
22. SURVIVAL (%) RECLAIMATION ALTERNATIVES
23. TREE HEIGHT (CM) RECLAIMATION ALTERNATIVES
24. EXPERIMENT #3 TUBELINGS OF 12 SPECIES PLANTED IN SIX CLAY SETTLING AREAS
25. Planting 12 tree species into 6 clay settling areas to test survival & growths
26. Mixed swamp species and habitat generalists had the best survival(Measured after two years) Pop ash mix swamp 99%
Florida elm mix swamp 88%
Red maple generalist 71%
Bald cypress mix swamp 65%
Magnolia mix swamp 41%
Sweet gum generalist 39%
Laurel oak generalist 35%
27. Species typical of cypress domes and bayheads had the poorest survival (Measured after two years) Swamp bay bay swamp 27%
Black gum cypress dome 25%
Cabbage palm mix swamp 23%
Pond cypress cypress dome 19%
Loblolly bay bay swamp 14%
28. EXPERIMENT #4 WE TESTED THE THEORY THAT SPECIES TYPICAL OF NORTHERN FLORIDA FLOODPLAINS WITH CLAY SOILS WOULD SURVIVE BETTER THAN MIXED SWAMP SPECIES TYPICAL OF BOTH AREAS Planted 5 swamp species typical of both areas
And
Planted 5 species typical of north Florida
29. SURVIVAL (%) OF NORTHERN SPECIES TYPICAL OF RIVER FLOODPLAINS (STD.DEV) Measured after one year Overcup oak 93.0 (3.3) %
Chestnut oak 84.1 (18.4) %
River birch 78.4 (23.5) %
Bitternut hickory 56.9 (23.5) %
Tulip poplar 35.0 (23.5) %
30. SURVIVAL (%) OF GENERALIST SPECIES TYPICAL OF RIVER FLOODPLAINS (STD.DEV) Measured after one year Sweetgum 81.3 (6.1) %
Water hickory 70.4 (13.1) %
Florida elm 68.4 (18.5) %
Laurel oak 53.9 (23.3) %
Cherry laurel 48.4 (25.9) %
31. FACTORS CONTROLLING FOREST RECLAMATION SUCCESS ON CLAY SETTLING AREAS FIRE DETRIMENTAL - - -
GRAZING DETRIMENTAL - -
MULCH NEUTRAL 000
CLEARING SITE NEUTRAL 000
NURSE CROP MAYBE 0/+
SEEDLING SIZE SOME SPECIES +/0
FERTILIZER POSITIVE +
SOIL STRUCTURE IMPORTANT ++
SPECIES SIGNIFICANT +++
WATER TABLE CONTROLLING ++++
32. CONCLUSION 1 CLAY AREAS ARE DRYING OUT OVER TIME AND MAY NOT CONTINUE TO BE SUITABLE FOR WETLAND SPECIES
33. CONCLUSION 2 THE WETLAND SPECIES MOST SUITABLE FOR CLAY AREAS ARE THE ONES THAT USUALLY GROW ON FLOODPLAINS WITH A RELIABLE WATER SOURCE SUCH AS RIVERS OR STREAMS, NOT HEADWATER LOW NUTRIENT ISOLATED WETLANDS
34. CONCLUSION 3 THE WETLANDS ESTABLISHED ON CLAY AREAS ARE NOT LIKELY TO BE THE SAME TYPE DESTROYED BY MINING, ESPECIALLY SPECIES TYPICAL OF ISOLATED WETLANDS AND SLOW MOVING SLOUGHS
35. CONCLUSION 4 TREES GREW MUCH BETTER ON A SITE USING THE SAND/CLAY MIX RECLAMATION TECHNIQUE
THIS RESULT IS CONSISTENT WITH RESULTS NEAR RIVER DELTAS WHERE HEAVY CLAY SOILS RETARD TREE GROWTH
36. CONCLUSION 5 TREE SPECIES ADAPTED TO HEAVY CLAY SOILS SUCH AS THOSE FOUND ALONG THE APPALACHICOLA RIVER FLOODPLAIN MAY BE MORE SUITABLE THAN CENTRAL FLORIDA SPECIES ADAPTED TO SANDY SOILS.
37. CONCLUSION 6 SOME FORM OF RECLAMATION THAT IMPROVES DRAINAGE AND SOIL STRUCTURE SHOULD BE REQUIRED FOR CLAY AREAS OR THEY WILL BECOME WILLOW AND CATTAIL MOSQUITO BREEDING HABITATS CONTINUING IN ARRESTED SUCCESSION FOR HUNDREDS OF YEARS
38. CONCLUSION 7 CLAY AREAS ARE PROBABLY NOT SUITABLE AS PERMANENT WETLAND MITIGATION SITES, BUT AT LEAST PART OF CLAY AREAS SHOULD BE PLANTED IN TREES TO ACT AS A SEED SOURCE AND HELP IMPROVE SOILS
FOREST TREES AMELIORATE POOR SOIL STRUCTURE OVER TIME
39. THE END IF NOTHING IS DONE
40. TREE SPECIES LIST Acer rubrum red maple
Betula nigra river birch
Carya aquatica Water hickory
Carya glabra bitternut hickory
Celtis laevigata hackberry
Fraxinus caroliniana pop ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash
Gleditsia aquatica water locus
Gordonia lasianthus loblolly bay
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum
Liriodendron tulipifera tulip poplar
Magnolia virginiana sweet bay
Magnolia grandiflora magnolia
Nyssa aquatica Water tupelo
Nyssa sylvatica biflora black gum
Persea palustris swamp bay
Prunus caroliniana cherry laurel
Quercus lyrata overcup oak
Quercus laurifolia laurel oak
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak
Sabal palmetto cabbage palm
Salix caroliniana willow
Taxodium ascendens pond cypress
Taxodium distichum baldcypress
Ulmus american var floridana Florida elm