1 / 7

FICTUP 4 th meeting 26 th of May 2010 Helsinki

FICTUP 4 th meeting 26 th of May 2010 Helsinki. Guidelines and recommendations for an effective implementation of the transfer process in a real context. Target group Schools, teachers training institution Content foreseen in the initial proposal Guidelines, success factors identified

marlee
Download Presentation

FICTUP 4 th meeting 26 th of May 2010 Helsinki

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FICTUP 4th meeting 26th of May 2010 Helsinki

  2. Guidelines and recommendations for an effective implementation of the transfer process in a real context • Target group • Schools, teachers training institution • Content foreseen in the initial proposal • Guidelines, success factors identified • Taking into account national contexts • Content NOT foreseen in the initial proposal • Business model • Language • English • Executive summary translated

  3. Guidelines and recommendations for an effective implementation of the transfer process in a real context • Detailed content foreseen in the proposal: • The role(s) of the expert teacher (tutor), the degree of implication and collaboration with the novice teacher; • The requirement for the novice teachers (degree of interest in ICT, degree of ICT usage at home for personal purposes, etc.); • The main necessary skills for the expert teachers • Some examples of collaborative process between the expert and novice teachers: • Technical collaborative tools; • Frequency of the training sessions; • Main tutoring steps (preparatory work, activity in classroom with tutor’s support, brainstorming on the running of the first activity with pupils, activity without tutor’s support, etc.); • The right balance between the face-to-face and distant exchanges according to the novice profile.

  4. Template: very first draft • Executive summary • In all partners’ languages • The FICTUP project • Phases • Some figures (number of cases, videos, etc.) • Methodology • Tutoring • Research (observation, analysis) • Final protocol • Without all research aspects Distinctions between countries Without mentioning the countries?  Min / max

  5. Template: very first draft • Observations / Analysis • Tutoring • Case (writing) • Videos • Distinction according to the typology (main category) • Recommendation / Hypothesis • Alternative uses of the pedagogical material • Other target group (non-novice teachers) • Use of research material (2nd year raw videos) • Other contexts (self-training) Conclusions and future prospects • Possible activities (research, experimentation, etc.) after FICTUP Annexe : typology

  6. First open questions • No business model but... • Estimation of the additional time spent by NT / “traditional” activities • Estimation of the additional time spent by ET • Order the content by: • Typology main categories • “Expertise area”: • Observations, conclusions, etc. based on the FICTUP experimentation • “Borderline” hypotheses, recommendations (diffusion) • Out-of-FICTUP hypotheses, recommendations (partners’ experience, other projects, etc.) • What do we expect from this deliverables? • / Target groups

More Related