130 likes | 261 Views
Creating meaningful performance objectives. Presenters . Allen Mueller Director of Charter Schools Atlanta Public School System amueller@atlanta.k12.ga.us Kelly Cadman Director of Education & Training Georgia Charter Schools Association kcadman@gacharters.org. Session Objectives:.
E N D
Presenters • Allen Mueller Director of Charter Schools Atlanta Public School System amueller@atlanta.k12.ga.us • Kelly Cadman Director of Education & Training Georgia Charter Schools Association kcadman@gacharters.org
Session Objectives: • How expectations in performance objective development have changed over the years…and new expectations • Types of objectives • Qualities of Good/Poor Objectives • Examples of Good/Poor Objectives
Writing SMART Objectives • Specific and Tied to Standards • Measureable • Ambitious and Attainable • Reflective of Your Mission • Time-Specific with Target Dates
Academic accountability (1) • Specific to SUBJECT and GRADE • Growth targets are founded on something specific – not pulled out of the air • Covers full term of the charter • Meets NCLB requirements for 100% meets and exceeds • Consider Comparisons (cohort groups, district, schools, state, etc.) • Includes a baseline • Consider leading and lagging measures
Academic accountability (2) • Measures to consider: • Standardized Tests • Normed (ITBS, Standford 9, etc.) • Criterion Reference Tests (CRCT, EOCT) • Non-Standardized Tests • Benchmark tests • Graduation Rates • Attendance Rates • Unique • Usually qualitative
Operational Accountability • Fiscal • Audit Results • Positive Cash flow • Student and Staff Retention Rates • Governance • Training • Qualifications • Compliance (timing, posting, accessibility, etc.) • Safety • Teacher and Student Retention • Parent, Student, Staff Satisfaction • Parental or Community Involvement • Unique
The Formula General Comparative
Examples: Increase the percentage of Special Needs Students scoring 80% or better on the 8th grade CRCT from: 59% 08-09 (baseline) Baseline can be district data, projected 64% 09-10 target audience, comparable charters. 69% 10-11 74% 11-12 80% 12-13 Outperform the district’s performance of Special Needs Students by 3% on the 8th grade CRCT from: 62% 08-09 (baseline) Baseline can be district data 65% 09-10 68% 10-11 71% 11-12 74% 12-13
Established format • Avoid narrative-only formats/goals • Include in the format: • Goal Format should be • Baseline easy to cut/paste • Measure into charter • Measurement Tool • Timeframe (full length of charter) • Context/Rationale (i.e., comparison to self or others, location, mission, etc.) should be considered in crafting goals (and should be able to be articulated)
Characteristics of Ineffective Goals • Lack of correspondence/baseline from district, state, etc. comparisons • Random in nature • Too aggressive • 100% of anything is always troubling • Too conservative • Ex. “Meets” district requirements • Measures can’t be quantified • Measures can’t be verified • Too narrow • Scope of measures • Type of measures • Too broad
Poor examples • ABC Charter School will meet the district’s rate for “meet and exceed”s on the EOCT Biology Test. • ABC Charter School will have 100% parent approval rating on the yearly satisfaction survey. • ABC Charter School will beat the district’s Accelerated Reader points by 3% every year. • ABC Charter School will outperform state CRCT 7th grade math averages by 3% each year. • ABC Charter School’s red headed 5th grade Gifted girls will outperform similar populations by 5% on the ITBS NPR.