E N D
1. Utilizing the Patient Safety Indicators for Improvement Anita Gottlieb, MA, APN, CPHQ
St. Joseph’s Mercy Health System
Hot Springs, Arkansas
2. “Great things are not done by impulse, but by a series of small things brought together”
3. The process: Beginning Steps January 2005 began reviewing PSI indicators using an interdisciplinary team
Leadership focused on data:
-Quality Committee of the Board, Hospital Board and System Board
Focused on areas where we exceeded the AHRQ population rate as areas for improvement
4. PSI Data – January 2005 PSI 3, 11 and 13 were the areas where we most frequently exceeded the AHRQ rate and we began to really drill down into the data.PSI 3, 11 and 13 were the areas where we most frequently exceeded the AHRQ rate and we began to really drill down into the data.
5. PSI – 03: Decubitus Ulcer
6. PSI – 03: Decubitus Ulcer Reviewed all cases listed in PSI for Decubitius Ulcer and found that present on admissions were not excluded especially for nursing home patients
Even with exclusion of present on admission we still frequently exceeded the AHRQ rate
Improvement Plan
- Six Sigma Project
- Clinical Skin Team
7. “Lowdown on Skin” Projects purpose: Prevent Nosocomial Decubitus Ulcers
Nosocomial Decubitus Ulcers patients have a longer length of stay than those patients that do not acquire a Decubitus Ulcer while hospitalized
Length of Stay was the common Metric
Medicare’s Geometric Length of Stay for each DRG was the standard that we used to compare both the Ulcer Group and the Non-Ulcer Group
8. Low Down on Skin – Six Sigma Project
9. Before & After Pilot Comparison
10. Improvement strategy
11. What are the Financial Results? There cost reduction after the Six Sigma project and it was directly associated with the length of stay.
The reductions relates to both direct cost and supplies.
12. Prevalence
13. PSI – 11: Post Operative Respiratory Failure
14. PSI – 11: Post Operative Respiratory Failure Reviewed all cases listed in PSI for Respiratory Failure
Definition of respiratory varied per physician
Coders were given exclusion PSI criteria and implemented use of documents Review Specialist for querying the physicians
Education provided to physicians regarding definitions of Respiratory Failure
15. PSI-13:Postop Sepsis
16. PSI-13:Postop Sepsis Reviewed all cases and diagnosis for sepsis were not meeting the “Surviving Sepsis Campaign” definition and guidelines
- Our facilities rate for Sepsis over all was greater than other hospitals in our System
- Determined some of “Sepsis” cases were being admitted to the acute units – not ICU
Previous Sepsis Six Sigma Project on Sepsis had been focused on Length of Stay
17. Hot Springs Six Sigma Sepsis LOS Solutions
Standardized processes for referral and evaluation for transfer to SNF/LTAC/Hospice
Implemented providing antibiotics within three hours
Removed barrier to tubing blood cultures and implemented tracking of times
Impact
Reduced LOS by .92 days
Improved time for blood cultures to lab by 126 minutes
Potential financial benefit – X $
18. PSI Data – January2009/ 2005
19. Lessons Learned Work on “Present on Admission” prior to October 2008 was impactful
Six Sigma tools have impacted positively on cost savings and quality of care
Must take small steps – it will take time and must continue monitoring to sustain
20. Questions “One’s destination is never a place but rather a new way of looking at things.”
Henry Miller