200 likes | 346 Views
Captives and employee benefits. Jeremy Hill Aon Consulting International Benefits Practice 27 August 1999. Jeremy G. Hill MA FIA Senior Consultant, International Benefits Practice. Aon Consulting Limited 15 Minories,
E N D
Captives and employee benefits Jeremy HillAon Consulting International Benefits Practice27 August 1999
Jeremy G. Hill MA FIASenior Consultant, International Benefits Practice Aon Consulting Limited 15 Minories, London EC3N 1NJ DX: 543 London CityTel: +44 (0)20 7767 2000 Fax: +44 (0)20 7767 2011Direct: +44 (0)20 7767 2163 Mobile: +44 (0)7747 693831e-mail: jeremy.hill@aonconsulting.co.uk Regulated by the Personal Investment Authority for investment business
Employee benefits in a multinational • Fragmented approach • Social security provision • Local legislation • Global policies not available • Multinational pooling first step solution
Multinational Pooling • Umbrella contract • Use of networks of insurers • Spread of risk • Increased negotiating power • Easier transfer of personnel • Improved reporting
Types of network • Wholly owned: e.g. Swiss Life, Zurich Life • Alliances: AIG/Winterthur, Aetna/Generali • Partnerships: IGP, Insurope
Types of pool • “Convenience” pools • Negotiated pools • Treatment of annual result • Stop loss basis • Loss carry forward basis • “Loss free” basis • Captive solution
Captive reinsurance • Use local insurers to: • issue local policy for compliance and tax purposes • handle claims and administration • Use pooling network to increase efficiency: • no need to negotiate with each local insurer • captive’s expenses reduced
Case study - background • AB Volvo • Decentralised structure • Lack of understanding of local structure • 25,000 staff outside Sweden
Company objectives • To understand current pooling position • To rationalise pooling strategy • To maximise cost savings • To involve the captive if appropriate • To introduce a means of control
Outline of the process • Information gathering • from subsidiaries • from pooling networks • Networks asked for quotations • Network selection • Implementation
Advantages of using a captive • Greater control of premiums and reserves • Access to reinsurance market • Increase in total premium in the captive • Diversification of captive's risk portfolio • Control/monitoring of information
Restrictions on captive involvement • Pension premium • Accident policies? • Medical policies? • US premiums?
Other captive considerations • Single network • Captive administration costs • Captive domicile • Retrocession of risk from captive • Restructuring of local premium payment
Key differences • Quarterly settlement of claims • Networks may not be single insurers • US difficult to involve • Low penetration of market • Small market for reinsurance of aggregate
Step by step approach • Understanding of current pooling situation • Consideration of pooling options • Consolidation of pools with reinsurance of results • Cession of risk and premiums to captive
Captives and employee benefits Jeremy Hill27 August 1999