310 likes | 637 Views
Fiscal Decentralisation. Growing interest in Fiscal Decentralisation:UK, Spain, France, Italy
E N D
2. Fiscal Decentralisation
Growing interest in Fiscal Decentralisation:
UK, Spain, France, Italy…
Why?
Allocative efficiency;
Subsidiarity,
democratic accountability and participation;
Leviathan;
Policy Innovation;
Economic Growth(?)
3. Fiscal Decentralisation
Two important points:
1) Sub-central fiscal policy plays significant role in many countries;
2) Central government retains substantial degree of ‘control’ via grants and/or tax sharing.
4. Decentralised Expenditure
5. Fiscal Decentralisation
6. Sources of Revenue
7. Along with the benefits of decentralisaion are there costs in terms of macroeconomic instability?
Decentralisation may lead to policy conflicts between tiers and greater macro instability
Policy Disagreements - cause, outcome, solution;
Political Economy;
Moral hazard – free riding;
Loss of central authority.
Tanzi (2001), Prud’homme (1995) and Wibbels (2000)
8.
b) Impact on cyclicality of fiscal policy
central govt. fiscal policy plays a key stabilisation role
combined with fiscal decentralisation?
Musgrave (1959): sub-central fiscal policy should be a-cyclical
but if revenue sources are pro-cyclical… potentially a source of bias
Along with the benefits of decentralisaion are there costs in terms of macroeconomic instability? (continued…)
9. Existing Literature
Considerable literature discussing pro-cyclical biases in (general government) fiscal policy, for recent surveys see IMF (2006), EC (2004, 2006), OECD (2003).
At the same time, a number of economists claim that greater sub-central fiscal autonomy leads to a lesser degree of macroeconomic control, cf. Rodden 2002, Rodden and Wibbels, 2002, Tanzi, 2001
but empirical evidence on this is sparse and typically restricted to individual country studies.
10. Pro-cyclical bias Consequences:
counteracts automatic stabilisers, exacerbates cycle;
at odds with tax smoothing, distortionary;
damaging for welfare;
expansionary policy used in good times, not offset
? deficit bias, debt accumulation ? sustainability?
11. Pro-cyclical bias Causes?
cyclical ratcheting of expenditure;
electoral cycle & weak institutions;
fiscal rules;
uncertainty surrounding potential output & output gap;
other factors – e.g. corruption.
12. Our Analysis
Darby and Roy (2007 in progress)
“Exploring Pro-Cyclical Bias in Sub-Central Fiscal Policy: Evidence, Likely Causes and Implications”
How does sub-central fiscal policy behave in light of the business cycle?
Is the nature and/or level of fiscal decentralisation an important factor in determining this behaviour?
What institutions and/or fiscal structures are best suited to providing macroeconomic stability?
13. Data
IMF Government Financial Statistics, 2002 Edition
Best source of internationally comparable data on fiscal variables disaggregated by tier of government
Consistent data for 14 OECD countries
Sub-divided: Central, State and Local
Unbalanced panel: 1970-2000
14. Econometric Specification – System 1
15. Econometric Specification – System 2
16. Robustness checks
Alternative measures of cycle:
Change in output gap
Change in log real GDP (per capita)
3SLS estimates - instrument output gap
instruments = lags of output gap, fiscal deficit,
long run real interest rate, inflation and
contemporaneous terms in log OECD output, exports
and oil price inflation.
17. Results: Sub-Central Revenue
18. Results: Sub-Central Tax Revenue
19. Which Taxes?
20. Which Taxes?
21. Results: Sub-Central Tax Revenue
22. Results: Sub-Central Tax Revenue
23. Results: Grants
28. Key Findings:
Countries that rely on sub-central taxation (excluding property tax) face pro-cyclical sub-central revenues.
Grants from Central Govt. are not used to offset this.
Pro-cyclical revenues spill-over into expenditure:
Capital Expenditure – highly pro-cyclical
Current Expenditure – pro-cyclical (especially in countries with high levels of sub-central tax decentralisation and limited borrowing autonomy).
29. Implications for Scotland and HM Treasury Current position:
The Scottish Government’s budget is currently insulated, to a high degree, from fluctuations in the Scottish and UK economies.
Macro stabilisation through automatic stabilisers operate at UK Government level.
The Scottish Government and UK local government currently face relatively predictable revenues.
30. Implications for Scotland and HM Treasury Proposals?
Local Income Tax
Greater revenue autonomy
Greater fiscal decentralisation
31. Implications for Scotland and HM Treasury Example - Local Income Tax
replace council tax with a 3p tax on earned income
BUT
Council tax – a-cyclical
Income tax – pro-cyclical
SO the switch would result in pro-cyclicality the revenue stream and less predictability ? more risk borne by the Scottish Government.
32. Implications for Scotland and HM Treasury Implications
Adverse impact on 3 yr spending plans.
Possible adverse impact from Scottish imbalances
on UK macro stability.
Remedies
Constrained borrowing over the cycle?
System of transfers from UK Government?
Continuing Research
Lessons from how other countries design
institutional arrangements, including sub-central
fiscal rules.