1 / 14

PE vs. Water and requirements on wall materials

Explore utilizing PE instead of water as a third wall in particle detectors, analyzing radiopurity implications, estimated background effects, and alternative designs using different materials such as LAr. Understand the constraints on materials like water, copper, and superisolation for optimal experiment sensitivity. Consideration of PE radiopurity levels, influence on background rates, and shielding with additional components like copper shield and liquid Argon.

marrow
Download Presentation

PE vs. Water and requirements on wall materials

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PE vs. Water and requirements on wall materials Béla Majorovits for the Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München

  2. OUTLINE: • Alternative to a third wall: PE instead of water • Radiopurity of PE • Estimated background due to PE and how could we avoid it? • What can we learn? MaGe simulations for: copper, water, superisolation

  3. Third wall required by LNGS for safety reasons Several disadvantages: • Less water to shield against external gammas and neutrons • More (potentially dirty) material in the vicinity of the detectors • More complicated structure

  4. Alternative design: Use PE and LAr instead of water and LN2: Advantagesof PE: • PE can not mix with LN2  No catastrophic evaporation possible • Self supporting: can be stacked around cryo tank  easy handling But what is the influence of PE material to expected background rate?

  5. Radiopurity of PE: Values taken from: Recent GERDA measurement and http://radiopurity.in2p3.fr  Assume 10 mBq/kg 208Tl to estimate overall contribution of PE

  6. Analytical estimate of background contribution I: • Calculate the number of emitted 2.6 MeV gammas from unit volume per unit time that are emitted towards the detector volume • Take into account self absorption • Integrate over thickness and sphere

  7. Analytical estimate of background contribution II: • Scale this number with reduction factor due to nitrogen and copper in the way • Scale this number with the peak to background ratio (from simulation) • Take into account anticoincidence and detection efficiency

  8. GERDA sensitivity(see K. Kroeninger)  We need to obey severe constraint: Achievable sensitivity of the experiment degrades rapidly with Btot≥10-3 Counts/kg/keV/y Bmax,contr≤ 10-4Counts/kg/keV/y

  9. Expected background contribution of PE with 2 m LAr tank 2.6MeVAPE = 10 mBq/kg  2.6MeVBPE= 1.9 * 10-2 Counts/kg/keV/y Reduction of factor 190 required in order to meet the requirement of 10-4Counts/kg/keV/y r = e -μCu L Cu= 1/190  we need to have additional copper shield of dCu,ana=133 mm Independent cross check with MC simulation: dCu,sim=138 mm

  10. PE contribution is less than 10-4Counts/kg/keV/y for liquid Argon as shield with vessel of more than 3000 mm radius  PE seems feasible, but makes sense only with tank radius >> 2000 mm

  11. We have to be aware:  Results calculated for PE with liquid Argon shield will be even stricter for any surrounding materials with liquid nitrogen shield!  Check for radiopurity requirements of shielding materials: • Water • Copper • Superisolation (~30 layers of MYLAR)

  12. Inner Copper wall • Vacuum (30 layers super-isolation) • Outer Copper wall • Water around the outer Copper vessel Simulations made with MaGe 2.6 MeV gammas randomly distributed in each volume:

  13.  !  We need to be extremely carefull with (surface) contamination of superisolation! 3600 m2 of very-clean surface Constraints for different materials:   Water needs to be of very high purity! doable: achieved for BOREXINO and SNO  Same requirements hold for PE: 10mBq/kg could be compensated by 200 mm of Cu shield  Copper has to be pure, but OF01 and NOSV copper meet requirements

  14. CONCLUSIONS • PE design with liquid Argon seems reasonable, but only with increased vessel radius r >> 2000mm • Restrictions for all materials are severe for LN2 • Beware of the superisolation: 3600m2 of (electrostatically easily chargable) very-clean surface: 260 μBq/m2 • Internal note with details will be published soon

More Related