1 / 16

Agenda for Correlation Data/Relationship

CIU 20 Principal Effectiveness Day 2 Correlation Data/Relationship for Principals Choose one of these dates: September 26, 2014 September 29, 2014 October 28, 2014 Michelle Bozzini – Assistant Director of Curriculum and Auxiliary Services Kathy Emeigh – Director of Curriculum.

marsden-reese
Download Presentation

Agenda for Correlation Data/Relationship

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CIU 20 Principal Effectiveness Day 2Correlation Data/Relationship for PrincipalsChoose one of these dates: September 26, 2014 September 29, 2014 October 28, 2014 Michelle Bozzini – Assistant Director of Curriculum and Auxiliary ServicesKathy Emeigh – Director of Curriculum

  2. Agenda for Correlation Data/Relationship • Welcome and Introductions • Professional Reflection • The Legislative “Journey” • Performance Level Descriptor “Walk” • Facilitated Process “Walk-Through” • Simulations “Drive” • Considering the “Destination”

  3. How has the Framework for Leadership helped you to be more effective? • What processes have you seen or heard about that are being used to effectively integrate the Framework for Leadership? • How have you seen the Framework for Leadership being used to increase principal/leader effectiveness?

  4. Multiple Measures Principal Effectiveness Ratings as Defined in Act 82Form 82-2 available on CIU 20 Website • For the overall principal effectiveness rating, we know that… • 50% will comprise the observation/practice piece (Framework for Leadership). • 15% will be derived from building level data (School Performance Profile – SPP). • 15% will be determined by the relative strength of conversation regarding the connectedness between average teacher observation/practice ratings and teacher-level measures. • 20% will incorporate Elective Data / SLOs for principals.(note: for 2014-15, elective data is optional) 4

  5. The Correlation “Journey…” • HB 1901 • Act 82 • Look at the Language • Look at Table H – Correlation Data Performance Level Descriptors • THE Pie • The Rating Tool – PDE 82-2

  6. Principal Effectiveness System in Act 82 of 2012 Building Level Data/School Performance Profile Indicators of Academic Achievement Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, All Students Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, Historically Underperforming Students Academic Growth PVAAS Other Academic Indicators Extra Credit for Advanced Achievement Observation/ Practice Framework for Leadership Domains Strategic/Cultural Leadership Systems Leadership Leadership for Learning Professional and Community Leadership Correlation Data/Relationship Based on Teacher Level Measures Elective Data/SLOs District Designed Measures and Examinations Nationally Recognized Standardized Tests Industry Certification Examinations Student Projects Pursuant to Local Requirements Student Portfolios Pursuant to Local Requirements 6 June 26, 2014

  7. Correlation Data Based Upon Teacher Level Measures • It was recommended that we adopt a process that focuses on the conversation between the supervising administrator and the principal / school leader based on the principal’s knowledge, understanding and intended use of the evidence / data presented. • The rating for correlation data is based on a qualitative assessment by the supervising administrator of the level of understanding (0, 1, 2, or 3) of the quantitative analysis conducted by the principal / school leader. 7

  8. Performance Level Descriptor “Walk” • Look at the “Performance Level Descriptor Chart” in your packet. • What are your “Noticings?” • Familiarize yourself with the definitions of the Performance Level Descriptors. • How is this an integral part of the “Correlation Conversation?

  9. Correlation Data Based Upon Teacher Level Measures • To aid the supervising administrator in assigning a correlation rating (0, 1, 2, or 3), a Performance Level Descriptor Chart has been developed. • This chart will provide guidance for rating the conversation between the supervising administrator and the principal / school leader regarding the connectedness between Teacher Level Measures and Observation and Practice (Framework for Teaching) ratings. • Teacher Level Measures “shall include, but not be limited to any combination of one or more of the following data” • Building Level Data / SPP • Teacher Specific Data (PVAAS, etc.) • Elective Data / Teacher SLOs 9

  10. Correlation Data Performance Level Descriptor Chart • The conversation will be measured based upon the principal /school leader’s understanding of these aspects: • Degreeof understanding of evidence presented regarding the relationship between teacher-level measures and teacher observation and practice ratings. • Quality of explanation provided for observed relationships between teacher-level measures and teacher observation and practice ratings. • Plans for how the data will be used to support school and LEA goals. 10

  11. Correlation Data Looking at “Connectedness” • The conversation will be based upon the connectedness between teacher level measures and observation/practice ratings. • The following charts (displayed on subsequent slides) may be used to determine the relative strength of the connectedness between the teacher level measures and observation/practice (Framework for Teaching) ratings. • Note: The ranges within the charts are based upon the conversion tables within PA 82-1 (Teacher Rating Tool). 11

  12. Break

  13. Facilitated Process Walk-Through • To prepare for this job – watch this video! • See Packet and walk through the process together.

  14. Simulations “Drive” • Divide into your areas of interest: 1. Elementary 2. Middle School 3. High School 4. K – 12 • In your “teams” drive through the Guidance for Completing the Correlation Section of the Rating Tool document

  15. WHY??? • Why do you think Correlation Data/Relationship is a part of Principal Effectiveness? • How does this affect the child in the classroom?

  16. The mission of the Pennsylvania Department of Education is to lead and serve the educational community, to enable each individual to grow into an inspired, productive, fulfilled lifelong learner. 18

More Related