1 / 26

Students and professors – are they ready for open access?

Students and professors – are they ready for open access?. Marcin Grynberg IBB PAN. a student. home. Obedience 49% 16% Subjectivity 41% 77% Imagination 20% 57%. World Values Survey www.worldvaluessurvey.org. kindergarten. countryside 37,5% mostly 6-year-old shortly. town

martin-kane
Download Presentation

Students and professors – are they ready for open access?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Students and professors – are they ready for open access? Marcin Grynberg IBB PAN

  2. a student

  3. home

  4. Obedience 49% 16% • Subjectivity 41% 77% • Imagination 20% 57% World Values Survey www.worldvaluessurvey.org

  5. kindergarten

  6. countryside • 37,5% • mostly 6-year-old • shortly town • 75,9% • 3–6-year-old • longer

  7. countryside vs town

  8. school

  9. The role of theMinistry of National Educatoion • slow reaction to the changing world • lack of procedures for teachers • lack of encouragement for effective trainings for teachers • lack of cooperation between schools and scientists

  10. well-educated, but the courses are too short teachers frustrated technologically backward

  11. teachers

  12. teachers

  13. students no higher skills stress boredom BUT: they appreciate no role-models

  14. stress student teacher

  15. expenditures

  16. professor * overworked * udereducated * frustrated * lecture and classes

  17. they don’t ask they don’t get what they want: ‘studies are some little school’ students they cannot cooperate they don’t see the point of education

  18. conclusions • students don’t see the point in learning, they lack activity, group work and sense of resposibility. • students don’t see the point in what they’re doing. • teachers don’t use the language of students to communicate with them. • professors rarely digress from the lecture. • everybody is afraid.

  19. the future • soft • talk to each other, solve conflicts • work in groups • arouse interest • moderate lessons and cope with group work • hard • modern methods– games, symulations, visualisations • hints for teachers • real school projects

  20. the future in practice(especially for librarians) students to the universities university students teach school students open recources from students for students

  21. acknowledgements • Educational Research Institute • Regional Centre of Social Policy in Białystok, • Monika Koblak, a teacher in Liceum z Maturą Międzynarodową im. I. Bergmana w Warszawie, • drawings: tymek borowski/czosnekstudio.com • a bow to my pupils, kondergarten pupils and students 

  22. Sources EducationalResearchInstitute • http://eduentuzjasci.pl/pl/raport-o-stanie-edukacji-2010.html?showall=&start=1 WorldValuesSurvey • http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/ Wikimedia • http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Animated-Flag-Poland.gif • http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Animated-Flag-Sweden.gif Regional Centre of Social Policy in Białystok • Stressamongchildren and adolescents- thescale of thisphenomenonin Podlasie Province (http://www.rops-bialystok.pl/downloads/ois-raport-stres.pdf)

More Related