1 / 22

Impact of Food Interventions on Health

Assessment of the effects of foods and diets on health through observational and intervention studies. Examples include interventions with plant foods, wholegrain foods, fruits, and vegetables. Importance of these studies for public policy and the horticultural industry.

Download Presentation

Impact of Food Interventions on Health

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Impact on health of food interventions Kirsten Brandt Human Nutrition Research Centre Research Group Food Quality & Health Newcastle University

  2. Impact on health of food interventions Observational studies and intervention studies Assessment of effects of foods and diets Assessment of effects of individual nutrients Examples of intervention studies with plant foods Intervention studies with wholegrain foods (WHOLEheart, GrainMark) Intervention study with fruit (Fruit at Work) Intervention study with vegetables (VegBP) Importance for public policy and the horticultural industry

  3. Observational studies and intervention studies Assessment of effects of foods and diets using observational studies Method: Record the diets for volunteers, and record the occurrence of diseases and/or risk indicators. Advantages: Cheap and relatively rapid, allows large numbers of people, results relevant for real diets. Disadvantages: Difficult to control for confounding factors, systematic weaknesses in methods for assessing diets. Conclusion: Important tool for development of hypotheses, but cannot provide a definitive proof.

  4. Observational studies and intervention studies Assessment of effects of foods and diets using intervention studies Method: Randomly assign volunteers to follow different diets, then record changes in diseases and/or risk indicators. Advantages: Can in principle eliminate the confounding factors. Disadvantages: Very expensive and difficult, placebo difficult or impossible, only possible for relatively short term effects. Conclusion: Essential to either verify or disprove outcomes of observational studies.

  5. Observational studies and intervention studies Assessment of effects of individual nutrients Observational: Assess diets and then calculate intake of each nutrient, to compare with health data. Requires accurate data on content for each food in the diet. Risk of confounding with other compounds found in the same food. Interventions: Carry out as placebo-controlled drug trials Allows full control of confounding factors. Requires that nutrients from pills have the same effect as when provided from the diet. Only relatively short term studies possible.

  6. Effect of vitamin E in the diet on risk of lung cancer Observational studies and intervention studies Each data point represents 3380 male smokers for 6 years. Vitamin E in the diet comes from plant oils, nuts, vegetables, fortified foods and many others People with very low vitamin E intake tend to have an unhealthy diet in general Data from Albanes et al. 1996

  7. Observational studies and intervention studies Effect of vitamin E in the diet on risk of lung cancer • Supplements can benefit health for those with a very poor diet, who are really deficient in the nutrient • Supplements provide no benefit if the diet contains enough of the nutrient to prevent deficiency

  8. Effects of antioxidant supplementation on health Antioxidants with no effect on mortality: vitamin C selenium Antioxidants that significantly increase mortality: vitamin A beta-carotene vitamin E Observational studies and intervention studies

  9. Examples of intervention studies with plant foods Intervention studies with wholegrain foods 1. WHOLEheart Method: 316 overweight volunteers with low habitual wholegrain food intake, divided into 3 groups: Control (no wholegrain food). Low (60g for 16 weeks). High (60g for 8 weeks, then 120g for 8 weeks). Range of foods provided to choose among, mostly wheat based, no other dietary changes requested. 2005-2008, funder: Food Standards Agency

  10. Examples of intervention studies with plant foods Intervention studies with wholegrain foods 1. WHOLEheart Result: No change in weight, cholesterol, blood pressure or other measured outcomes. Increased energy intake in treatment groups. Brownlee et al. 2010, British Journal of Nutrition. Conclusion: Either the effect of whole grain consumption of cardiovascular risk factors is too small to measure, or any benefits are counteracted by the high sugar content of many wholegrain foods.

  11. Examples of intervention studies with plant foods Intervention studies with wholegrain foods 2. GrainMark Method: 67 volunteers, divided into 2 groups: Wheat, no wholegrain foods for 4 weeks, then 48g wheat whole grain foods for 4 weeks, and then 96g for 4 weeks Rye, same time periods, but with rye-based whole grain foods. Range of foods provided to choose among within each group, standard meal provided for the evening before measurements. Measurements of cholesterol content of blood, blood pressure, and markers of intake. 2007-2009, funder: Food Standards Agency

  12. Examples of intervention studies with plant foods Intervention studies with wholegrain foods 2. GrainMark Results: Significant improvements in both cholesterol and blood pressure in Rye group Similar trends in Wheat group, but not significant. Increased energy intake during treatment periods. Haldar et al. 201? Conclusions: Rye has stronger effect on cardiovascular risk factors than wheat, and a better experimental design gives more significant results.

  13. Examples of intervention studies with plant foods Intervention study with fruit: Fruit at Work Method: 409 volunteers at Durham County Hall, divided into 2 groups: Intervention, had access to 2 pieces of fruit per day at work for 18 weeks; Control, no change during the intervention period, but received the same fruit for 18 weeks after the end of the measurements. No control of diet otherwise. Participants filled in questionnaires about their diet online. Blood pressure and weight was measured at work 3 times, 0, 9 and 18 weeks after start. 2008-2009, funder: European Commission See more on YouTube: ‘The ISAFRUIT Project: Fruit at work study’ Fruit at Work

  14. Examples of intervention studies with plant foods Intervention study with fruit: Fruit at Work Results: Alinia et al., Bryant et al., Lake et al., 201? Fruit at Work

  15. Examples of intervention studies with plant foods Intervention study with vegetables: VegBP Hypothesis: That the beneficial effects of consumption of vegetables on blood pressure is due to their content of nitrate. Nitrate can be taken up by the body and converted to NO. NO is a signal molecule that supports relaxation of blood vessels and thereby improves blood flow and reduces blood pressure. Short-term intervention studies (1-6 days) with beetroot juice or pure nitrate have shown significant reductions in blood pressure in human volunteers. Can this be replicated and sustained for a longer period in older people at high risk for hypertension?

  16. Examples of intervention studies with plant foods Intervention study with vegetables: VegBP Method: 225 volunteers with marginally elevated blood pressure (SBP 130-150), divided into 3 groups: Low nitrate: Avoid nitrate-rich vegetables in diet for 24 weeks. Receive 100g per day of nitrate-poor vegetables (20 mg nitrate) from week 8 to week 24, to be consumed in addition to habitual diet. High nitrate: Avoid nitrate-rich vegetables in diet for 24 weeks. Receive 100g per day of nitrate-rich vegetables (250 mg nitrate) from week 8 to week 24, to be consumed in addition to habitual diet. Intermediate: As the others, but receive 50g nitrate-rich and 50g nitrate-poor vegetables (135mg nitrate) during the 16 week intervention. 2010-2013, funder: Food Standards Agency

  17. Examples of intervention studies with plant foods Intervention study with vegetables: VegBP

  18. Examples of intervention studies with plant foods Intervention study with vegetables: VegBP High nitrate (avoid): Lettuce, spinach, beetroot, radish, rocket, celery, Chinese cabbage, Chinese greens, Pak choi, parsley, Swiss chard, fennel, endive, other salad leaves, chervil, beetroot juice, rhubarb. Variable/inconsistent (avoid also): Watercress, celeriac, leek, green cabbage (spring cabbage, pointed cabbage), chicory. Low nitrate (eat normally): Cauliflower, cucumber, gherkin, Brussels sprouts, red cabbage, white cabbage, turnip, parsnip, pea, bean, tomato, squash, pumpkin, onion, asparagus, potato, sweet corn, mushroom, pepper, eggplant, garlic, sweet potato, carrot, broccoli, artichoke, Jerusalem artichoke, any fruits, berries, fruit juices.

  19. Importance for public policy and the horticultural industry Our knowledge about the extent and causes of the health benefits of vegetables and fruit is extremely vague. Until now, all properly tested hypotheses have been disproved: antioxidants, fibres, minerals. vitamins A, C and E. This is the reason for the ‘5-a-day’ message: We don’t know which vegetables or fruits are actually good for whom. So the only improvement that can be recommended is to increase total volume.

  20. Importance for public policy and the horticultural industry Our aim is to identify some more tangible benefits, with a reproducible effect and understandable mechanism. If we succeed with this, then it opens a wide range of opportunities: Specific health claims for particular species and/or varieties of F&V Quality criteria based on composition rather than appearance Precise recommendations for particular target groups: old, young, overweight, diabetic, smokers etc. Increased awareness and credibility of the health benefits of F&V and their roles in a healthy diet

  21. Importance for public policy and the horticultural industry Intervention trials are important and necessary for quantification and understanding of health benefits of foods. This knowledge is essential for formulation of clear, precise and credible recommendations to the public, which can switch attention from marketing fads to real knowledge. In many cases it requires radical re-thinking of most of what we think we know about food and health. Commercially it will benefit some companies and harm others. The consumers are the certain winners.

  22. Acknowledgments: • WHOLEheart study: Iain Brownlee, Chris Seal, Sharron Kuznesof, Wendy Bal, Susan Jebb, David Richardson. • GrainMark study: Sumanto Haldar, Chris Seal, Wendy Bal, Manfred Beckmann, Lee Fawcett, John Draper, Alastair Ross. • Fruit at Work study: Charlotte Bryant, Inge Tetens, Chris Seal, Amelia Lake, Sevil Alinia. • VegBP study: Sumanto Haldar, Chris Seal, Wendy Bal, Roy Lamb, Franziska Mohring, John O’Brien, Gary Ford. Thank you for your attention! Any questions?

More Related