490 likes | 684 Views
THE MEPA TECHNOLOGY Background Overview & Processes. SESSION OBJECTIVES. At the end of the session, the participants are expected to: Explain the major milestone of MEPA in Region XII; Discuss the basic principles of MEPA Technology;
E N D
THE MEPA TECHNOLOGY Background Overview & Processes
SESSION OBJECTIVES • At the end of the session, the participants are expected to: • Explain the major milestone of MEPA in Region XII; • Discuss the basic principles of MEPA Technology; • Familiarize the proposed SIP Guide along with the Continuous Improvement (CI) Framework; • Discuss MEPA process from school to Regional Office vis-à-vis institutionalization of Integrated Regional MEPA; and • Develop deeper understanding on how essential MEPA technology in the full implementation of strategic plans vis-à-vis accelerating access, quality and governance.
ACTIVITY Directions: Assess how you conduct Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) in your respective District/Secondary Clusters and School by completing the template below:
ANALYSIS • What are the prevailing observations on the things that went well? 2.What are the prevailing observations on the things that did not go well? 3. What generally are the aspects that need to be improved?
TA & MAJOR POLICIES ENHANCED/ DEVELOPED THROUGH MEPA • 2nd Q-RMEPA 2013 • Focus: Access - Enrolment • 3rd Q-RMEPA 2013 • Focus: Access – Drop-out Rate • 4th Q-RMEPA 2013 • Focus: All KPIs • 1st Q-RMEPA 2014 • Focus: Completion & Quality
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ACTED / MAJOR POLICIES ENHANCED/DEVELOPED DURING 2ND Q-RMEPA 2013: ACCESS - ENROLMENT
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ACTED / MAJOR POLICIES ENHANCED/DEVELOPED DURING 2ND Q-RMEPA 2013: ACCESS - ENROLMENT
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ACTED / MAJOR POLICIES ENHANCED/DEVELOPED DURING 3RD Q-RMEPA 2013: ACCESS – DROP-OUT RATE
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ACTED / MAJOR POLICIES ENHANCED/DEVELOPED DURING 4TH Q-RMEPA 2013: ALL KPI’s
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ACTED / MAJOR POLICIES ENHANCED/DEVELOPED DURING 1ST Q-RMEPA 2014: COMPLETION & QUALITY
INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF MEPA AT ALL LEVELS & UNITS • Phase I: Immersion of 6 Non-PRIME Divisions in RMEPA • Phase II: Capacity Building • of Senior Managers, EPS, PSDS, SHs (833 – UNICEF) • Phase III: Institutionalization of DepEd XII Integrated Regional MEPA Operational Framework
SBM CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Curriculum & Learning (K to 12) Leadership & Governance VMG Self-managing & Self-renewing Accredit Assess Functionally Literate Citizen Evaluate Plan Monitor Structure Implement LEARNING COMMUNITY Resource Management Accountability & Continuous Improvement BESRA THRUSTS NCBTS, ECE, ALS, ETC CENTRAL,REGION, DIVISION AChild and Community-centered Education Systems
M&E in SBM: Accountability & Continuous Improvement AChild and Community-centered Education Systems
4. CO MEPA 2. DMEPA 3. RMEPA 1. SMEPA • School KPIs • PIR of AIP • Operational Concerns
AR & CR Actual Enrolment Performance & Drop-out All KPIs
MAJOR TRAINING OUTPUT • Enhancement of Session Guides for the Regional Roll-out to PSDS & SHs • Finalization of Schedule of SDO Trainers for 2 Batches • Contextualization of MEPA Operational Framework per SDO • Interfacing of Regional TA Teams with their respective baby SDO
MEPA MECHANICS I. In-depth Analysis of KPIs • In-depth Analysis of KPIs - Access: 2nd & 3rd Quarter; Quality: 1st Quarter; Access & Quality: 4th Quarter) • Implementation Status of the 15 PPAs • Agenda affecting program design, policy standard, system and TA needed II. Discussion/Interpellation • Lead Discussant as Facilitator • Interpellation by: PPA Holders(DMEPA/RMEPA); SPT (SMEPA) III. Synthesis • Highlighting TA needs to be addressed • Policy Directions flagged IV. Next Steps & Agreement (Plan Adjustment)
The SMEPA Meeting SMEPA Meeting SCHOOL MEPA (1 Day) Discussion of KPI & AIP Implementation Objectives: To enable the SCHOOL to immediately respond issues and concerns affecting the effectiveness of programs and efficiency of programs delivery • Immediate feedback on efficacy and weaknesses of program implementation at school level vis-à-vis AIP implementation • Respond to technical and training needs of teachers • Identify enhancements to education policies and guidelines
The DMEPA Meeting SMEPA Meeting Objectives: To enable the DIVISION OFFICE to immediately respond issues and concerns affecting the effectiveness of programs and efficiency of programs delivery • Immediate feedback on efficacy and weaknesses of program implementation at school level vis-à-vis AIP implementation • Respond to technical and training needs of teachers • Identify enhancements to education policies and guidelines DIVISION MEPA (2 Days) Presentation & Discussion of KPI & AIP Implementation
The RMEPA Meeting SMEPA Meeting Objectives: To enable the REGIONAL OFFICE to immediately respond issues and concerns affecting the effectiveness of programs and efficiency of programs delivery • Immediate feedback on efficacy and weaknesses of program implementation at school level vis-à-vis AIP implementation • Respond to technical and training needs of teachers • Identify enhancements to education policies and guidelines REGIONAL MEPA (2 Days) Presentation & Discussion of KPI & AIP Implementation
DASHBOARD: QUALITY (1st Quarter) • Focus on DepEd’s KPIs on QUALITY: NAT, CR, SReA, EGRA, Phil IRI, NCAE • Review on the bottlenecks of all PPAs vis-à-vis “PRODUCING CHILDREN WITH QUALITY LEARNING” • Leading review to a more systematic and systemic analysis of DepEd policies on quality
DASHBOARD: ACCESS (2nd Quarter) • Focus on DepEd’s KPI on ACCESS: - SMEPA: Enrolment Rate (Community Mapping), Attendance - DMEPA: Enrolment Rate, Enrolment Pattern - RMEPA: Participation Rate, GER, Enrolment Pattern • Review on the bottlenecks of all PPAs vis-à-vis “KEEPING ALL CHILDREN IN SCHOOL” • Leading review to a more systematic and systemic analysis of DepEd policies on access - enrolment
DASHBOARD: ACCESS (3rd Quarter) • Focus on DepEd’s KPI on ACCESS: - SMEPA: Drop-out Rate (Absolute number) - DMEPA: School Leavers (Absolute number) - RMEPA: Cohort Survival Rate, School Leavers • Review on the bottlenecks of all PPAs vis-à-vis “KEEPING ALL CHILDREN IN SCHOOL” • Leading review to a more systematic and systemic analysis of DepEd policies on access – CSR & SLR
DASHBOARD: ALL KPIs (4th Quarter) • Focus on all DepEd’s KPIs on ACCESS & QUALITY: - SMEPA: Enrolment, Drop-out, NAT - DMEPA: Enrolment, School Leavers (Absolute no.) - RMEPA: NAT, PR, GER, CSR, SLR • Review on the bottlenecks of all PPAs vis-à-vis “KEEPING ALL CHILDREN IN SCHOOL & PRODUCING WITH QUALITY LEARNING” • Leading review to a more systematic and systemic analysis of DepEd policies on quality & access.
SIP Guide + CI ProcessGuide in developing and implementing School Improvement Plan (SIP)
OUTCOME INDICATORS 1. All schools to be upgraded in the SBM Level of Practice: Level 1 (50%); Level 2 (40%); Level 3 (10%) by 2019.
OUTCOME INDICATORS 2. All schools have realigned their SIP with new template and established Continuous Improvement (CI) Framework vis-à-vis SMEPA. 3. SDO through District/SC to close the gaps in terms of addressing operational concerns of schools vis-à-vis implementation of PPAs of schools on access and quality.
APPLICATION How do you plan to institutionalize MEPA in your division: - DMEPA? - SMEPA?
CLINCHER Make a reflection on the statement below: What challenge does it pose?