230 likes | 499 Views
Structural Effects on NOIand Cash Flow. NOI (or Cash Flow). . . . Land owner (unsubordinated). First mortgage. Second mortgage or Mezzanine financing. . Equity (priority). . Equity (subordinated). . Land owner (subordinated). . Tranches--Slicing a Transaction into Components. Sou
E N D
1. Real Estate Private Equity Markets
3. Sources of Equity Financing Owner/developer personal resources
Friends, family, and business associates
Third-party equity sources
High net worth individual investors
pension funds
Opportunity funds, mezzanine investors, hedge funds
Life insurance companies
Creative Sources
Land Owners. Contribute land in exchange for an interest in the completed property
Land lease
Seller financing
Any other source with potential to gain from the transaction
4. Financial Structures Utilized to Own or Invest in Real Estate Free & Clear or unlevered100% equity, without use of borrowed funds
Leveraged
Equity combined with borrowed funds
Hybrid
Combines equity, borrowed funds, and mezzanine financing
Mezzanine financing may be structured as equity and/or debt
5. Unlevered Required Rates of Return for Various Real Estate Investment Strategies
6. Joint Ventures(aka Partnership) Sale and financing transactions are more commodity-like whereas joint ventures are individually negotiated and tailored transactions
A joint venture may be formed to:
Acquire a specific property, a portfolio of properties, or an operating company
Recapitalize an existing partnership
Develop a property
7. Direct equity investments and/or equity joint ventures are available for
All product types
All acquisition models-opportunistic, value creation, rehabilitation, yield, etc.
Utilize third-party financing (70% to 80%)
Term- 1 to 7 years
Pre-defined exit strategy Sources of Equity Financing
8. Structuring Joint Ventures Each joint venture is idiosyncratic; there are no pre-set terms and conditions
Terms to be negotiated include:
Contributions
Preferred returns and Claw-backs
Promotes
Governance, guarantees (if any), fees and transaction costs and expenses
Winding-up, Buy/Sell
9. Joint Venture Financing One method public and private real estate operating companies (REOC) are increasingly using to access capital is joint ventures with institutional investors such as pension funds.
Involve formation of new, special-purpose entity which is utilized to own the properties of the joint venture.
Involve the contribution of existing properties owned by the REOC, acquisition of properties from a third-party, to-be-developed properties, or a combination of all three.
10. Joint Venture Financing If the joint venture involves existing properties owned by the REOC, the REOC contributes the properties at an agreed upon acquisition value while the institutional investor contributes cash.
Profit sharing is based on the value of the equity contributed by the parties to the joint venture.
11. Joint Venture Financing Under normal circumstances, the REOC receives an asset management for managing the joint venture as well as fees for property management and leasing the joint ventures property.
Joint ventures have a specified life or term, negotiated among the parties at the inception of the joint venture.
Upon expiration, the properties are liquidated either through the sale of the properties to a third party, or acquired by one of the joint venture participants based upon a pre-negotiated formula or right of first refusal. The REOC may receive a disposition fee for selling the properties to a third party.
13. Case StudyTerms of Acquisition JV Structure: Limited Liability Company comprised of a subsidiary of the REOC (as managing member) and an affiliate of the institutional investor
Purpose: To acquire $250 million of industrial property
Invested Capital: Equity of $125 million, with 50% leverage; the institutional investor contributed 50% ($62.5 million); the REOC contributed 50% ($62.5 million)
14. Case StudyTerms of Acquisition JV Leverage: 50% of the total acquisition price of the properties
Term: Minimum 6 years; maximum 8 years
Value-add Component: Improve property, create the value, and sell once stabilized to create Net Investment Income
Management: Major decisions (Sale, Finance, Liquidation, Management Change) require both partners concurrence. Day to day operations and management handled by REOC.
15. Case Study Terms of Acquisition JV Fees: The REOC will receive an disposition fee equal to 1% of the sales price, management fees and leasing commissions at market rates, and an asset management fee equal to 0.5% of the value of the joint venture properties.
16. Case Study Acquisition JV Waterfall Distribution First, to repay capital contributions made by each partner (typically 50%/50%)
Second, to pay each partner a 10% cumulative annual return on capital
Third, 35% to Institution and 65% to REOC
Projected Leveraged return was 11% for Institution and approximately 13% for REOC.
17. Case Study Terms of Development JV Structure: Individual Limited Liability Company comprised of a subsidiary of the REOC and an affiliate of the institutional investor
Purpose: To develop $300+ million of multi-family property
Invested Capital: Equity of $100 million, with 70% leverage; the Institutional Investor contributes 85% ($85 million); the Developer contributes 15% ($15 million)
18. Case Study Terms of Development JV Leverage: 70% of the development cost
Term: Develop, Stabilize, Sell (typically 3 yrs)
Management: Major decisions (Sale, Finance, Liquidation, Management Change) require both partners concurrence. Day to day development operations and management handled by REOC.
19. Case Study Terms of Development JV Fees: Developer receives a GC fee of 5% of hard costs, development fee of 3% of total costs, and a management fee of 3% of gross revenues
Cost Overruns: Cost overruns offset by Developers fees, then 85% Institutional Investor and 15% Developer
20. Case Study Development JV Waterfall Distribution First, to repay capital contributions made by each partner (typically 85%/15%)
Second, to pay each partner a 10% cumulative annual return on capital
Remaining proceeds split 60% to Institutional Investor and 40% to Developer
Target IRR 18% to Institutional Investor
21. Typical Waterfall Distribution Current Environment: The capital partner has more leverage. This means that the hurdle rates may be higher, the promotes for the LP may be lower and/or fees may be reduced to the operating partner. In certain cases all 3 of these things have occurred.
22. Cash Flow Distributions
23. Proceeds of Sale