220 likes | 325 Views
Children’s Partnership . Strategic Planning Process & Outcomes April 2014 Children First Feedback Session. Strategic Planning Process. Accomplishments 2009 - 2013. Childcare Gap Assessment Family Forums on ECD/EDI trends South Asian ECD Task Force
E N D
Children’s Partnership Strategic Planning Process & Outcomes April 2014 Children First Feedback Session
Accomplishments 2009 - 2013 • Childcare Gap Assessment • Family Forums on ECD/EDI trends • South Asian ECD Task Force • Collaborative training initiatives with FPRN & ECD Mental Health Collaborative • Surrey Board of Trade & Family Friendly Workplace Awards • Child & Family Profile
Background Research -Landscape Changes • Smarter Cities Challenge • Child & Youth Friendly City Strategy • Middle Years programs and manager position • Early Learning programs (SSD) entrenched • Community school partnership • All day Kindergarten • New Aboriginal Enhancement Agreement • New senior management at the City & School District
Landscape Changes • Nurse Family Partnerships • New pediatrics at new hospital • Early Years Strategy • My Neighbourhood/ My Future • Heart Mind Index results for Surrey • Other Changes?
EDI Results • Surrey’s child vulnerability rates comparable to BC • The range of vulnerability in Surrey is narrower (20-50%) • Vulnerability rates in language & cognition decreasing • Vulnerability in social emotional domains increasing
EDI Results • Significant variations in vulnerability rates between adjacent neighbourhoods • Significant increases in vulnerability rates in some neighbourhoods • ELLs who have communication as their sole vulnerability will catch up and may do better eventually than their English only peers.
CF Input - EDI Development patterns in Surrey are impacting the EDI results • Vulnerable families are moving where the housing is affordable and public transit is accessible • Child development services often not adequate in newly developed areas of the city • Significant regional and international in migration
CF Input - EDI Caregiver isolation a factor in EDI results • Grandparents and nannies are playing an increasing role in caregiving School Readiness – play-based approach versus academic readiness approach • Need for increased awareness of the value of play
Who We Talked To What We Heard • CP members interviews – Strategic Alignment Document • Current child development priorities • Programs & Initiatives • Requested support from the CP • Criteria for choosing priorities
Child Development Priorities • Aboriginal children and their families* • Refugee and recent immigrant children and their families* • Children who live in poverty and their families* • Healthy physical development • Mental health and social/emotional wellbeing* • Equitable access to services for all families* • Supporting literacy • Assisting parents and caregivers to effectively support their children* • Child and youth social engagement and connection to community • Engaging the community in child development*
Requested Support from CP • Joint training* • Data sharing • Raising awareness of child development and the EDI (including brain development & broader social issues)* • Community development and capacity building for child development* • Sharing resources (e.g. space) • Raising awareness of individual partners and their child development initiatives • Continuing to engage the Surrey business community • Responding to growing evidence of rising child anxiety levels * • Reducing parenting program stigma • Co-ordinating child development initiatives*
Who We Talked To What We Heard • CF & MCM members focus group discussions and interviews – Synopsis Document • Trends in child development • What does Surrey do well/ areas for improvement • Top child development priorities • Areas for CP Support
Key Trends • Growing need for children and their families in Aboriginal community* • Growing need in the newcomer populations (especially the Punjabi community)* • Services & programs not able to meet the needs of a growing population • Increasing child anxiety* • Full day kindergarten impacts • Play-based vs academic readiness for school
What Does Surrey Do Well? • Working collaboratively • Working with limited resources • Addressing issues specific to Surrey • Supports and services that are being provided effectively such as parenting groups for 0-6 and 0-12 engagement activities • Drop in services • Building community
What Could Surrey Do Better? • Flexible, affordable and accessible service models including childcare. These should be near home, work or school. • Supportive programming for parents (supports & education) with a need to highlight the Surrey context • Outreach to community (for services )
Child Development Priorities from CF/MCM • Support and development of childcare services & service providers • Develop accessible ECD programming and services (including childcare)* • Increase parent and caregivers’ knowledge of child development and support their ability to provide positive experiences for their children*
CF/MCM Priorities • Assist families (newcomers) to connect with services so that children become familiar and engaged with the community, make friends and are ready for school and learning* • Build trust with children and families* • Support staff development and training • Promote communication and share learnings between children, families , agencies and schools
Priorities that would benefit from the support of the CP • Advocacy for childcare • Support for ECD services and providers* • Support for coalition service planning that identifies and targets specific neighbourhoods • Continuation of the building of interagency relationships that promote accountability* • Training opportunities for those working with children* • Support for the development of specific programs and a continuum of supports • Develop the ability and recognition of Surrey as being a national or regional leader in child development • Funding and sustainability • More resources for families with young children • Mental health initiatives*
Criteria • Do a majority of the partners agree that it is a priority that they can work on together? • Does it have a direct and lasting positive impact on Surrey children & their families? Does it allow child development to move forward in Surrey? • Is it relevant to the partners, community trends, current opportunities, best practices, and organizational priority areas? • Does it complement and/or enhance the work of the Early and Middle Childhood networks? • Does it link to emerging initiatives like the Early Years Strategy & My Neighbourhood, My Future?