350 likes | 502 Views
Mixed-Signal ASIC Design for Space Communications. Presented by Dr. Rajan Bedi. Mixed-Signal ASIC Design for Space Communications.
E N D
Mixed-Signal ASIC Design for Space Communications Presented by Dr. Rajan Bedi ESA AMICSA 2006
Mixed-Signal ASIC Design for Space Communications UK EXPORT CONTROL SYSTEM EQUIPMENT & COMPONENTS RATING: 3A001a1a, 3A001a2, 3A001a5a1, 3A001a5a2, 3A001a5a3, 3A001a5a4, 3A001a5b, 3A101a, 3C001a, 3C001b, 4A002b2, 4A002b1 & 5E001c1. UK EXPORT CONTROL TECHNOLOGY RATING: 3E001, 4E001 5E001b1 & 5E001c2e. Rated By : Rajan Bedi with reference to UK Export Control Lists (version INTR_A12. DOC 13 August 2003) which contains the following caveat: “The control texts reproduced in this guide are for information purposes only and have no force in law. Please note that where legal advice is required, exporters should make their own arrangements”. Export licence : Not required for EU countries. Community General Export authorisation EU001 is valid for export to : Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland & USA. ESA AMICSA 2006
Presentation Overview • Introduction & Motivation • Research into mobile payload ADCs • Research into broadband payload ADCs • Research into space-grade DACs • Mixed-Signal Processing • Conclusion ESA AMICSA 2006
Introduction • Increasing amounts of analoguecircuitry and digital logicare now being integrated on die and flown. • The availability of: • Low-power, high-performing BiCMOS technologies, fT (peak cut-off frequency) ~ 300 GHz! • The inherent total-dose tolerance of the SiGe HBT. • The addition of a SOI layer to SiGe BiCMOS. • The ability to individually size of NPNs and PNPs with trench isolation. • Integrated EDA tools and common design & verification flows. • All of these offer the potential to advance mixed-signal microelectronics for space applications. ESA AMICSA 2006
Motivation • The benefits of integrating analogue circuitry with digital logic include: • Higher performance • Lower power consumption • Less mass • Reduced costs • Improved reliability • Greater levels of reusability • Enhanced system testing and quality • All of these benefits contribute to the spirit of “Faster, Better, Cheaper”! ESA AMICSA 2006
Motivation • Telecommunication satellites with on-board digital processors require ADCs at the receiver to digitize the IF/baseband carrier information. • Future mobile missions will be required to digitize information bandwidths around 50 MHz – this will necessitate baseband sampling at a rate greater than 100 MSPS. • Future broadband missions will be required to digitize information bandwidths around 500 MHz – this will necessitate baseband sampling at a rate greater than 1 GSPS. ESA AMICSA 2006
Motivation • This performance will only be delivered by advances in mixed-signal processing. • Experience has shown that accessing the latest deep sub-micron technologies is difficult due to the low volumes required by space companies. • When the major semiconductor vendors are willing to develop hardware, the NRE costs are exorbitant. • Moreover, the suitability of the fabrication technology for space flight first needs to be assessed, with vendors often adopting a low-risk approach to radiation testing and qualification. • As a satellite manufacturer, how do we support the development of future digital payloads for our customers? ESA AMICSA 2006
Motivation • This variation in the range of sampling frequencies greatly impacts the micro-architecture, the circuit design, the resolution and power consumption of mixed-signal converters that can be considered for use on satellite payloads. • This range of payload types, limited power budget, restricted fabrication options and operation in a harsh environment, all combine to make ADC/DAC design for space communications extremely challenging. • This objective of this presentation is to share with vendors currentresearchon low-power, high-performance, space-grade converters for use with future mobile and broadband payloads. ESA AMICSA 2006
ADC Design • The design of low-power ADCs capable of sampling around 150 MSPS differs from those required to sample above 1 GSPS. • The development of an ADC involves a number of trade-offs, e.g. as the required sampling frequency or dynamic range increase, so does the complexity, size, weight, cost and power dissipation of devices. • As a general rule, effective resolution decreases by one bit for every doubling of the sampling frequency. ESA AMICSA 2006
Low-Power Narrowband ADC • For low-power ADCs, a sampling frequency of 150 MSPS is achieved by implementing micro-architectures that combine elements of the successive approximation and flash techniques with pipeline-type signal processing. ESA AMICSA 2006
Pipelined ADC Micro-Architecture First stage of the pipeline performs a coarse quantisation on the input while subsequent stages are concurrently processing previously acquired input samples. STAGE 0 ANALOGUE PIPELINE INPUT STAGE 1 STAGE N-1 STAGE N … + + + + + + LATCH LATCH LATCH … DIGITAL PIPELINE ESA AMICSA 2006
Pipelined ADC Micro-Architecture Each stage comprises a S&H, low-resolution ADC and DAC and a subtractor. SAMPLE & HOLD + VIN A -- ADC DAC ESA AMICSA 2006
Pipelined ADC Micro-Architecture • High-throughput, concurrent design. • For pipelined ADCs, power dissipation can be minimised through the appropriate choice of per-stage resolution and selection of suitable op-amp architectures. • Thermal noise, comparator offsets, sample-and-hold offsets, gain errors and non-uniform levels within the interstage DACs all affect the performance of pipelined ADCs. • Simulations and circuit design are continuing that investigate trade-offs between thermal noise, speed, linearity and power dissipation. ESA AMICSA 2006
Pipelined ADC Micro-Architecture • For low power operation, CMOS converters are preferred as digital consumption scales with sampling frequency. • Bipolar converters developed to operate at a particular frequency but used at lower rate, will incur a fixed penalty and dissipate the same power as clocking at the higher frequency due to constant current structures. ESA AMICSA 2006
Pipelined ADC Micro-Architecture • The digital capability of CMOS easily allows the inclusion of error correction, calibration and other computational features to improve overall converter performance and accuracy. • Fabrication using deep submicron CMOS results in higher performance due to reductions in parasitics. • However, concomitant with the migration to smaller feature sizes, lower supply voltages make it more difficult to maintain input SNR – Continual technology scaling impacts ADCs! ESA AMICSA 2006
Low Power Broadband ADC • For low-power broadband ADCs, sampling frequencies above 1 GSPS are achieved by implementing interleaving micro-architectures or variations of Flash techniques: • Folded Flash • Folded & Interpolative Flash • Pipelined, Folded & Interpolative Flash ESA AMICSA 2006
Folded Flash ADC Folding is a technique that reduces hardware while maintaining the one-step nature of a full Flash ADC. An analogue pre-processing circuit generates a residue which is digitised to obtain the LSBs. The MSBs are resolved using a coarse ADC that operates in parallel with the folding circuit. FOLDING CIRCUIT FINE ADC INPUT COARSE ADC DIGITAL ADDER & CORRECTION CIRCUIT DIGITAL OUTPUT WORD ESA AMICSA 2006
Folded Interpolative Flash ADC • Interpolation reduces the number of comparator preamplifiers at the input of a Flash converter. • Interpolation substantially reduces the input capacitance, power dissipation and area of flash converters, while preserving the one-step nature of a Flash architecture. • Simulations show that offset, gain and timing mismatches result in SNR degradation at high input frequencies. ESA AMICSA 2006
DAC Design • We have started investigating current-steering DAC micro-architectures with the goal of achieving low power with high speed and low distortion. • Traditionally current-steering DACs were fabricated using bipolar technology, however, the ability to generate matched CMOS current mirrors will result in lower power consumption. • A segmented architecture provides a good balance between performance vs. area and complexity. ESA AMICSA 2006
VLSI • To achieve the required performance and low power, silicon-based technologies are being targeted for fabrication. • CMOS converters are preferred as digital power dissipation scales with sampling frequency. • SOI CMOS typically offers 30 to 50% higher performance for the same power compared to bulk CMOS (30% less power at the speed). • SOI offers reduced cross-talk for mixed-signal design, immunity to latch-up, better tolerance of SEEs and the absence of radiation-induced leakage between devices. ESA AMICSA 2006
VLSI • BiCMOS processes combine faster, higher-current driving bipolar transistors with smaller, lower-power, high impedance CMOS devices. • This makes BiCMOS attractive for mixed-signal design. • The bipolar transistor can be either Si or SiGe. • For the same operating current, a SiGe HJT has higher speed, increased gain, lower RF noise and less 1/f noise compared to a Si BJT – ft ~ 300 GHz. • SiGe BiCMOS allows the integration of analog, digital and RF using existing CMOS foundries. • Currently investigating SOI and BiCMOS to minimise noise coupling through the wafer substrate. ESA AMICSA 2006
Space Microelectronics • Heavy-ion strikes can trigger latchup in CMOS and bipolar devices with the potential to damage a circuit permanently. • In ADC/DACs, a transient generated in the analogue part of a device can propagate into the digital section causing logic level shifts. • The migration to smaller geometries has helped CMOS transistors to become inherently more resistant to TID radiation as thinner gate oxide layers trap less positive charge. • Radiation hardening by designtechniques are being used to mitigate the damage, functional upsets and data loss caused by radiation. ESA AMICSA 2006
Radiation Hardening By Design • The use of enclosed layout NMOS transistors. • The design of portions of a circuit using PMOS FETs only. As PMOS transistors are not prone to edge leakage, there is no need for annular layout. • Such structures are immune to latchup due to the absence of stray silicon-controlled rectifier structures. • Latchup can be avoided by completely enclosing NMOS and PMOS FETS using guard rings or through the addition of an epi layer. • Design-hardened versions of integrated circuits typically require more die space than their soft counterparts! ESA AMICSA 2006
Analogue Section of 12-bit SegmentedDAC Incorporating RHBD 63 Unary Current Sources 6 Binary Current Sources ESA AMICSA 2006
Radiation Hardening By Design • All NMOS transistors drawn as Enclosed Layout Transistors (Annular) – this makes them immune to edge leakage effects. • Guard rings isolate all n+ diffusions at different potentials. • Current sources are all PMOS. • Solely PMOS structures are immune to latch-up. ESA AMICSA 2006
PMOS Current Source – (LSB Binary) VDD W = 1.1 μm L = 0.8 μm M = 1 bias_P1 W = 1.1 μm L = 0.8 μm M = 1 bias_P2 ILSB out ESA AMICSA 2006
PMOS Current Source – (Unary) VDD W = 1.1 μm L = 0.8 μm M = 64 bias_P1 W = 1.1 μm L = 0.8 μm M = 64 bias_P2 64 * ILSB out ESA AMICSA 2006
Mixed Signal Processing • A number of signal processing techniques exist that potentially could ease the hardware implementation of the data converters: • Complex Baseband Sampling • RF/IF Bandpass Sampling ESA AMICSA 2006
Complex Baseband SamplingAnalogue Generation of I/Q Samples i(t) i[n] xi(t) A/D i[n] – jq[n] x(t) x(t) -90° xq(t) q(t) q[n] A/D sin ωct Analogue Digital Complex baseband sampling at a rate greater than the highest frequency component – allows access to lower sampling frequencies – lower power if using CMOS ADCs. Difficult to match frequency response of both paths ESA AMICSA 2006
A/D Complex Baseband SamplingDigital Generation of I/Q Samples i’[n] i[n] x(t) cos ωct q[n] q’[n] sin ωct Analogue Digital Complex baseband sampling at a rate four times the highest frequency component. Single ADC, no matching issues, simple mixing ESA AMICSA 2006
Band-pass AAF Amp. 2 Fs 281 Fs/2 70.25 Fs 140.5 1.5 Fs 210.7 11.5 Fs 1615.7 12 Fs 1686 Frequency (MHz) Zone 1 2 3 4 23 24 RF Bandpass Sampling of L-band User Uplink The availability of wideband ADCs, e.g. bandwidths approaching 3 GHz, makes direct sampling of L/S-band RF carriers a real possibility. Bandpass sampling achieves digitisation and downconversion in a single operation, without the use of analogue mixers, local oscillators and image-reject filters. Intentionally alias the RF information to baseband/IF. ESA AMICSA 2006
RF Bandpass Sampling • To realise bandpass sampling, the ADC must have the necessary analogue input bandwidth to process the highest frequency component within the input signal. • Low distortion and good linearity at this frequency are essential. • ADCs intended for undersampling applications are more sensitive to the amount of noise at the input than a traditional converter. • Board layout, decoupling considerations and minimising jitter on the sampling clock are critical. ESA AMICSA 2006
Conclusions • I have shared with you currentinvestigations that research the development of low-power, high-performance, space-grade converters for use with future mobile and broadband payloads. • Satellite manufactures have intimate knowledge of payloads. • Different types of telecommunication satellites have unique mixed-signal requirements, e.g. sampling frequency, resolution, dynamic performance and power consumption. • Pipelined ADCs should be targeted for future mobile payloads and folding, interpolative flash architectures for broadband processors. • Segmented, current-steering DACs should betargeted for future satellites. ESA AMICSA 2006
Conclusions • A re-usable design and verification flow and design trade-offs at the systems-level, the micro-architectural level, the circuit level and at a technology level combine to enable mission-specific, mixed-signal IP. ESA AMICSA 2006