1 / 17

Review of MBTI & Strong Interest Inventory

Review of MBTI & Strong Interest Inventory. February 12, 2011. Date. Myers Briggs Type Indicator. Based on Carl Jung’s Personality Theory ( Psychological Types, 1921) General Attitude: Extroversion or Introversion Four Functions: 1. Feeling - understanding value of conscious activity

masao
Download Presentation

Review of MBTI & Strong Interest Inventory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Review of MBTI & Strong Interest Inventory • February 12, 2011 Date

  2. Myers Briggs Type Indicator • Based on Carl Jung’s Personality Theory (Psychological Types, 1921) • General Attitude: Extroversion or Introversion • Four Functions: • 1. Feeling - understanding value of conscious activity • 2. Thinking - understanding meaning of things; relies on logic and careful mental activity • 3. Sensation - means by which person knows something exists • 4. Intuition - knowing about s/t without conscious understanding of where knowledge comes from

  3. Carl Jung: Personality Theory • 8 Personality Types: • Extroverted Thinking - abstract concepts are ones passed down from other people; extroverted thinkers are often found working in the research sciences and mathematics • Introverted Thinking - interpret stimuli in the environment through a subjective and creative way; interpretations are informed by internal knowledge and understanding; philosophers and theoretical scientists are often introverted thinking-oriented people • Extroverted Feeling - judge the value of things based on objective fact; comfortable in social situations, they form their opinions based on socially accepted values and majority beliefs; found working in business and politics • Introverted Feeling - make judgments based on subjective ideas and on internally established beliefs; ignore prevailing attitudes and defy social norms of thinking; thrive in careers as art critics • Extroverted Sensing - perceive the world as it really exists; perceptions are not colored by any pre-existing beliefs; jobs that require objective review, like wine tasters and proofreaders, are best filled by extroverted sensing people • Introverted Sensing - interpret the world through the lens of subjective attitudes and rarely see something for only what it is; make sense of the environment by giving it meaning based on internal reflection; often turn to various arts, including portrait painting and classical music • Extroverted Intuitive - understand the meanings of things through subliminally perceived objective fact rather than incoming sensory information; rely on hunches and often disregard what they perceive directly from their senses; inventors that come upon their invention via a stroke of insight and some religious reformers are characterized by the extraverted intuitive type • Introverted Intuitive - influenced by internal motivations even though they do not completely understand them; find meaning through unconscious, subjective ideas about the world; comprise a significant portion of mystics, surrealistic artists, and religious fanatics • Functions: People make use of two functions primarily; others inferior; hierarchy, not set type; compass analogy

  4. Myers-Briggs Development • Katharine Cook Briggs & daughter, Isabel B. Myers • self-knowledge and enhancing human relationships • Two sets of attitudes: • Extroversion/Introversion & Judging/Perceiving • Two pairs of mental functions: • Sensing / Intuition & Thinking / Feeling • Step I - 4 letter “Type” / Step II - Elaboration on these themes (20 facet scales)

  5. MBTI: Trait vs Type • Traits: relatively fixed patterns of personality & bx; various amounts are thought to have different values (i.e., anxiety, autonomy) • Types: all equally legitimate but qualitatively different categories; mx by amount of preference (sorting task); not mutually exclusive, just tend to prefer one method over another (i.e., thinking / feeling) • Discuss differences between s/t like MMPI vs. MBTI with regard to diagnosis, exploration, dynamics, and preferences

  6. MBTI: Key Terms • Extraversion (E) • Introversion (I) • Sensing (S) • Intuition (N) • Thinking (T) • Feeling (F) • Judging (J) • Perceiving (P)

  7. MBTI: Functions • Dominant Function: Most energized & accessible (ENFP) • Auxiliary Function: Balance b/w perception & judgement; tends to operate in nonpreferred attitude; less energized and accesible (In-Ff) • Tertiary Function: attitude not specified; opposite to auxiliary function (Thinking) • Inferior Function: opposite in function and attitude; little conscious energy (Introverted-Sensing)

  8. Interpretive Considerations • Four Categories - emphasize Type not Score • Theta score used for computer analysis of preference • Raw “points” - not significant in themselves • Preference Clarity Index (1-30) - preferred / non-preferred pole • Preference Clarity Category - Very Clear/Clear/Mod/Slight

  9. Validity Concerns • Because: Self report, forced-choice, & face valid . . . • 1. pressure 2 conform • 2. Gender bias • 3. life crises • 4. transitional development • 5. lack of differentiation / age • 6. perception re: desired type for job, situation, etc. • Verify type with client; ensure understanding of type not trait

  10. Description of the Strong • 317-item inventory • Designed to provide “compare [an individual's] pattern of responses to the pattern of responses of people in of different types and in different occupations" • First published in 1927 • Designed to provide information about the world of work, and to promote occupational exploration by assessing an individual's pattern of interests.

  11. Strong: Sections • Four Sets of Scales • 6 General Occupational Themes based on Holland’s (1997) typology, • 25 Basic Interest Scales • 211 Occupational Scales • 4 Personal Style Scales: Work Style, Learning Environment, Risk Taking, and Leadership Style. • Administrative indices show the number of total responses; percentages of the like, indifferent, and dislike responses; and infrequent or unpopular responses.

  12. Strong Interest Inventory • General Occupational Themes—what am I like? Based on Holland’s themes. • Basic Interest Scales– what do I like? • Occupational Scales- who am I like?

  13. Strong: Additional information • Time to complete: ½ hour • Reading level: sixth grade. • Age level: 17 and older, because young respondents do not have stable interest patterns. • Scoring service must be used. • Output: profiles or interpretations

  14. Strong: Norms • The General Occupational Themes Basic Interest Scales and Personal Style Scales were normed on 9,484 men and 9467 women; this represents men and women in each of the occupational groups collected as criterion groups for the 1994 revision. • The mean for both sexes is set at a standard score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.

  15. Strong: Occupational Scale Norms • Normed on those employed in the Occupation. • Occupational members met four basic criteria: 1) age (at least 25 years old), 2) tenure (had been in their occupation for at least 3 years), 3) satisfaction with their work, and 4) pursuit of typical occupational tasks. • Most occupational groups contained 200 or more members; • The mean and standard deviation for each group are 50 and 10, respectively.

  16. Strong: Validity and reliability • Very high reliability for all scales • the older the group, the more reliable the test scores • Each type of scale has concurrent validity, that is that persons in an occupation score higher on their own scales. • 50-75% of individuals tested entered the occupations predicted by their profiles.

  17. Strong: Cross-cultural Validity • Few racial/ethnic differences found at the item level. • Even fewer differences were found at the scale or profile level. • It is important to note, though, that no research has examined whether interpretations are generalizable across cultures. • Gender differences greater than race/ethnic group differences.

More Related