160 likes | 333 Views
BULGARIAN ASSOCIATION OF SUPPLEMENTARY PENSION SECURITY COMPANIES. DEVELOPMENT OF PRIVATE PENSION INDUSTRY IN THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA. Dr. Nikola Abadjiev Chairman Bulgarian Association of Supplementary Pension Security Companies (BASPSC). Conference “ Evolution of Pension Reforms:
E N D
BULGARIAN ASSOCIATION OF SUPPLEMENTARY PENSION SECURITY COMPANIES DEVELOPMENT OF PRIVATE PENSION INDUSTRY IN THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA Dr. Nikola Abadjiev Chairman Bulgarian Association of Supplementary Pension Security Companies (BASPSC) Conference “Evolution of Pension Reforms: Bulgaria’s Experience and Regional Perspectives” Sofia, Bulgaria, February 16 – 17, 2005
MILESTONES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FULLY-FUNDED PENSION SYSTEM (SUPPLEMENTARY PENSIONS PROVISION) 1994: Provision of supplementary voluntary private pensions - establishment of the first pension fund managing companies 1997: Consolidation of the activity. Establishment of the industry NGO institution – BASPSC 1999: Enactment of initial legal framework, establishment of II and III pillars of the fully-funded pension system (enactment of SVPIA and MSIC) 2000: Institutionalization of the state regulatory and supervisory authority (State Insurance Supervision Agency - SISA). Licensing of pension fund managing companies 2001-2002: Mandatory fully-funded pension provision starts 2003: Enactment of the new law: Social Insurance Code. Establishment of the Financial Supervision Commission (FSC).
BASIC FEATURES OF THE PRIVATE (FULLY-FUNDED) PENSION SECTOR • II PILLAR: SUPPLEMENTARY MANDATORY PENSION PROVISION (OCCUPATIONAL AND UNIVERSAL PENSION FUNDS): • Mandatory affiliation; • Defined contribution pension schemes; • Licensing regime for pension fund incorporation; • Legal independence of pension funds from pension fund managing company (joint stock company); • Centralized collection of contributions – National Social Security Institute. • III PILLAR: SUPPLEMENTARY VOLUNTARY PRIVATE PENSION PROVISION • PUBLIC CONTROL OVER THE ACTIVITY OF PENSION FUND MANAGING COMPANIES: ADVISORY AND TRUSTEE BOARDS • STATE SUPERVISION OVER THE PROVISION OF FULLY-FUNDED PENSIONS • TAX INCENTIVES IN FAVOR OF PENSION FUND MEMBERS AND EMPLOYERS.
BULGARIAN PENSION MODEL IPILLAR State Social Security Provision PAYG system NSSI II PILLAR Supplementary Mandatory Private Pension Provision of Fully-funded Individual Accounts IIIPILLAR Voluntary Private Pension Provision of Fully-funded Individual Accounts Universal PF: mandatory participation of all workers born after 31/12/1959 Occupational PF: employees of heavy and dangerous professions requiring earlier retirement Voluntary PF:since 1994
Contribution Flow Individual Account Universal Pension Fund (IIPILLAR) II pillar – UPF; OPF Individual Account Banking system National Social Security Institute Individual Account Occupational Pension Fund (IIPILLAR) Employer /Employee/ Individual Account Individual Account Voluntary Pension Fund (IIIPILLAR) III PILLAR - VPF Individual Account
Specificities of Fully-funded Pension Provision Sector • Continuous increase of the coverage of the fully-funded pension system by transferring part of the social security contribution from the PAYG system (for UPF from 2% to 5 %) • Legally enforced possibility for one pension company to manage three pension funds for supplementary fully-funded pensions • Mandatory contribution to OPF – 100 % financed by employer (or other contribution provider) • Mandatory contribution to UPF – liability divided between employer and employee(2004 ratio – 75:25, 2009 and following years ratio - 50:50 )
2005 REALITY IN THE PRIVATE FULLY-FUNDED PENSION SECTOR • FULLY OPERATING THREE-PILLLAR PENSION SYSTEM. 8 PENSION COMPANIES MANAGING 24 PENSION FUNDS; • INCREASING INTEREST IN THE ACTIVITY OF FULLY-FUNDED PENSION PROVISION. NEW ATTITUDE TO THE PENSION SYSTEM; • INCREASED COVERAGE OF THE FULLY-FUNDED SYSTEM –LARGER NUMBER OF PERSONS AFFILIATE TO THE SYSTEM; • INCREASED SIGNIFICANCE OF PENSION FUND MANAGING COMPANIES AS INVESTORS: GOOD RATE OF INCREASE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS; • SUCCESSFUL CONSERVATIVE INVESTMENT POLICY: HIGH RATE OF RETURN TO THE INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTS; • BETTER INSTITUTIONAL COLLABORATION IN THE SYSTEM, INCLUDING THE MAJOR STAKEHOLDERS: PENSION FUND MANAGING COMPANIES, NATIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTE AND FINANCIAL SUPERVISION COMMISSION.
Achieved Projected
Rate of Increase of Pension Fund Assets Thousands BGL Achieved Projected
EVOLUTION OF PENSION FUND SYSTEM Regarding Voluntary Pension Funds: 2004:534 415members and BGL 325 457thousand of assets, 2010: 665 thousand members and BGL 1 360 million in assets; Regarding Universal Pension Funds: 2004: 2 004 776members and BGL 261 126thousand in assets, 2010: 2 239 thousand members and BGL 2 150 thousand in assets; Regarding Occupational Pension Funds: 2004: 176 173members and BGL 200 832thousand in assets, 2010: 85 thousand members and BGL 584 million in assets; Pension Fund System Total: 2004: 2 715 364members and BGL 787 415thousand in assets, 2010: 2 989 thousand members and BGL 4 billion and 94 million in assets.
Annual Rate of Return of Pension Funds * 2004 Average interest rate for bank deposits in BGL: 5,66% * 2004 Inflation rate: 4,0%
Investment Portfolio Structure: Pension Fund Total 2004 2003
CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES IN 2005 Improvement of the regulatory framework in the Social Insurance Code in the sections related to the fully-funded pensions; Strengthening the mechanisms for larger coverage of the system by tax incentives; Increase of the relative importance of the fully-funded pension pillars compared to the PAYG first pillar of the system; Increase of the pension fund contribution; Improved state supervision over the system with respect to income and retirement entitlement; Creation of an enabling environment for the investment policy of pension funds;
CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES IN 2005(2) • Improved investments: achievement of more effective diversification in the investment portfolios; • Acceleration of the collection process and shortening of the time period for contributions transfer to the individual accounts of pension fund members; • Improvement of pension fund switching procedure; • Dynamic contact with pension fund members by using more actively modern means of communication and information; • Implementation of new and more effective IT solutions in the activity of pension fund managing companies; • Enabling pension funds actual participation in the economic development of the country.