1 / 18

Sequencing and Feedback in Teaching Grammar

Sequencing and Feedback in Teaching Grammar. Problems in Sequencing. How do we sequence the grammar in a teaching programme? From easy to difficult? Not easy to determine Based on some form of ‘natural order’? Research is inconclusive about a natural order. Problems in Sequencing.

matia
Download Presentation

Sequencing and Feedback in Teaching Grammar

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sequencing and Feedback in Teaching Grammar

  2. Problems in Sequencing • How do we sequence the grammar in a teaching programme? • From easy to difficult? • Not easy to determine • Based on some form of ‘natural order’? • Research is inconclusive about a natural order

  3. Problems in Sequencing • If declarative knowledge, then presented bit by bit • Additive process • But, difficult structures may mean they should be introduced early so that given more treatment • What do students need then? Often when we teach, we require students to use a structure that will only be taught later. • 10 divided by 2 is a passive construction; passives taught later, 10 divided by 2 is taught early

  4. Traditional Divide-up-the-grammar curriculum (Byrd & Reid, 1998) • LEVEL 1 (Beginner) • Simple sentences • Compound sentences • Nouns (single and plural) • Pronouns (objective, demonstratives) • LEVEL 2 (Low Intermediate) • 75% mastery of level 1 • Complex sentences with time clauses • Noun phrases • Pronouns (reflexive) • Simple questions (yes and no) • LEVEL 3 (Intermediate) • 75% mastery of level 2 • Complex sentences with cause and effect clauses • Simple questions • Nouns (collective and abstract)

  5. Problems in this Tradition • Division is inauthentic because students often cannot wait for a higher level to use the language (e.g. cannot delay noun phrases because language will have NPs) • Division is unrealistic because it is difficult to “master” a grammatical structure in a specific period of study • Cannot characterise “Beginner” in terms of features such as simple past tense and nouns; or “Intermediate” in terms of progressive tense and abstract nouns

  6. Implications of this tradition • Curriculum and materials can become distorted • E.g. simplifying texts can lead to more difficult texts as loss of connectors and other language used to keep text coherent; Ss learn to read unnatural texts rather than developing strategies for reading authentic texts

  7. Sometimes, difficulty is not the grammar but the background knowledge • Message: cannot build around lists of grammar structures that limit student access to certain items – and that require reading materials that they use contain only those items

  8. Alternative: Ordering according to clusters • Particular features of grammar are clustered in sets used in different types of discourse (Biber, 1988) • Narrative communication (story telling etc. based on past time events) • Interactive communication (interacting with audience by asking questions and using language that is thought of as ‘oral’) • Informational communication (stating facts, and using language to give information)

  9. Narratives • Simple past tense with some past perfect and past progressive; • Proper nouns for characters • Personal pronouns (especially he and she) • Time words and phrases to coordinate chronological organisation of passages

  10. Informational Writing • Long, complicated Noun phrases • A very accurate tool for measuring work • The main component of the device • Passive verbs (as focus is on processes) • A limited set of verbs • Present tense

  11. Principles of Sequencing Grammar (Byrd & Reid, 1998) • P1: Students work with authentic reading materials and take on authentic writing tasks • P2: These materials require Ss to learn about grammatical features characteristic of the text/task • P3: Grammar is selected based on the features of the discourse they have to handle • P4: Grammar is presented in clusters rather than in specific segments of a course • P5: Proficiency levels are determined not by individual items of grammar but by complexity of reading/writing text/task • Curriculum gives Ss multiple opportunities to encounter these grammar structures (spiral/cyclical model)

  12. Sequencing Now • Focus on fluency activities have given rise to new criteria for sequencing (functions, notions/concepts, even integration with skills) • Focus on fluency allows for some student inaccurate use of forms • In focus on fluency, impossible to predetermine grammatical structures

  13. FEEDBACK • Various types • Direct and indirect • Positive and Negative • Cognitive and Affective • Recast/reformulation; repair; clarification requests etc. (see. Pp 117-119 Thornbury)

  14. Decisions to make • Who responds? • Teachers/classmates/self • What kind of response? • Positive as well as corrective/prescriptive/just to errors?/just to content?/detailed or holistic? • When to respond? • In speaking – immediately?/at the end of class?/when common errors are made?/when errors affect meaning? • Where to respond? • In writing – in the margins/end comments • Why respond? • To teach/to grade/to build trust/to stimulate revision

  15. Should teachers • Respond to every error/not respond to errors/respond to only what they are teaching • As teachers identify errors, should they • Correct them/merely indicate them/prioritise errors based on – how much they intefere with communication; commoness of occurrence; reason(s) for occurrence (error gravity) • How might a teacher incorporate errors into overall evaluation? • How can teachers analyse patterns of error that will help students learn correct language structures?

  16. Common Sources of Errors • First language interference • Overgeneralisation of rules • High level of difficulty of the language structure (should not confuse difficult to explain and difficult to learn) • Production errors – called mistakes

  17. Awareness of Student Preference • Quantity: Every error marked? Only important errors marked? • Affect: How does the student react to teacher feedback? (Cognitive feedback – explanation; affective feedback – motivational) • Interaction: Does the student learn better through interaction/negotiation

  18. Bottom line in treating errors is that teachers “should not stifle the students’ attempts at production by smothering them with corrective feedback” (H.D.Brown)

More Related