1 / 20

Magnet Lab User Portal https://users.magnet.fsu/

Magnet Lab User Portal https://users.magnet.fsu.edu/. August 2010. Links to all User Program Policies Labwide Proposal Review and Demographics Database. User Proposal Portal. Proposal: Science /Technology Description Demographics CV /Resume Funding Sources

matsu
Download Presentation

Magnet Lab User Portal https://users.magnet.fsu/

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Magnet Lab User Portal https://users.magnet.fsu.edu/ August 2010

  2. Links to all User Program Policies Labwide Proposal Review and Demographics Database User Proposal Portal Proposal: Science/Technology Description Demographics CV/Resume Funding Sources ‘Excluded Reviewer’ List Web-based Review - Two External Reviewers - Internal Staff Scientists If external review(s) are late… If users are new users… …the MagLab may award magnet time based on internal reviews alone… …and require the User Committee to provide external review of the proposal at its next meeting. Experiment 1: User Program Specific Experiment Description Magnet Time Request Decision on Magnet Time - Internal Technical Experts - Specific to User Program - Specific to Experiment A single proposal can support multiple experiments. The number of experiments and period of time over which a proposal remains in effect will be determined by each individual user program. External reviewers will only have access to the proposal submission, not the description of a specific experiment. In particular, information such as details about a proprietary experimental technique will not be made available to external reviewers. Denial of Magnet Time - Link to Reviews - Link to User Program Head - Link to Appeals Process - Information/Advice on Resubmission - Request for Feedback (Process clear ?, Rationale clear ?) Assignment of Magnet Time - Link to Reviews - Link to User Program Head - Link to Site-Specific Training - Request for Feedback If user requests Rapid Access permission from the MagLab director (or designee), then experiments will be considered for provision of magnet time until the next batch proposal call or annual User Committee meeting provides an opportunity for a formal review of the proposal. Annual User Committee meeting will assume additional responsibility of ensuring external review of every proposal.

  3. NHMFL Home Page: magnet.fsu.edu August 2010

  4. Unified User Portal • users.magnet.fsu.edu • One policy governs all 7 user programs • One point of entry for all users

  5. Submitter view – Getting Started: People info Demographics Discipline User Type

  6. Proposal Submission, Management & Review Processes ~~ Implementing Good Practice and Policies ~~ Submitter view – Getting Started: ProposalinformationProposals are externally reviewed!

  7. Proposal File: • 1-3 page describing Scientific or Technical development including broader impacts. • 1 page description of prior relevant work • 2 page biographical sketch Submitter view: Proposal “Home Page”. “Actions” & info collected uniform across all 7 user programs

  8. Submitterview: Experiment “Home Page” “Actions” are standard; follow-on questions & data collected are tailored to operational needs of each facility

  9. Submitter view (Experiment) – Magnet systems for Pulsed Field Facility

  10. Submitter view (Experiment) – Sample and safety info for Pulsed Field Facility

  11. Submitter view (Experiment) – Scheduling for Pulsed Field Facility

  12. Submitter view (Proposal & Experiment ) – “Review & Submit” Same for all facilities

  13. Facility Managerview

  14. Facility Managerview: Each Facility has its own standing User Proposal Review Committee (UPRC) According to User Policy: minimum 7 members; more external members than internal

  15. Reviewerview

  16. Many management reports already online

  17. NEW ONLINE USER PROGRAM MODULE: Unified User Access, Proposal Handling, Feedback and Reporting Each user facility reviews, ranks, schedules and manages its own time according to established protocols. Common reporting, user feedback and surveys, and publication records

  18. System Managers & User Proposal Review Committee (UPRC) Members (confidential)

  19. System Managers & User Proposal Review Committee (UPRC) Members (confidential) continued

More Related