1.14k likes | 1.15k Views
This report analyzes the achievement data of Grinnell High School for the 2010-2011 academic year, focusing on reading and math proficiency. The report evaluates the progress made towards the Annual Improvement Goals and AYP targets, highlighting areas of improvement and areas that require further attention.
E N D
Definition of terms • AIG: Annual Improvement Goals (Set by the district, must be measurable, approved by the School Improvement Advisory Committee and then by the board) • SIAC: School Improvement Advisory Committee (District Employees, Community Members who look at student achievement data and make a recommendation to the board for student achievement goals). • AYP: Adequate Yearly Progress (NCLB stair-step model of proficiency) which is reported to the state. Schools must meet AYP or go on a watch list, then become a SINA school
District Annual Improvement Goals Decrease the percentage by 50% of non-proficient students in grades 4, 8, and 11 as compared to their matched cohort FAY percentile scores in grades 3, 7, and 10 in reading comprehension and mathematics, and in grade 8 and 11 as compared to their matched cohort FAY percentile scores in grades 7 and 10 in science, as measured by the appropriate ITBS and ITED subtests.
GHS Reading Data (AIG) • In 2009-10, 23 students were considered non-proficient in Reading Comprehension in the 10th Grade. • 17 of those students improved their percentile ranking as 11th Graders • However, only 12 of the 23 students become proficient. • RESULT: Goal to reduce number of non-proficient students by 50% was met by 1 student in Reading Comprehension. • IF we look at the same cohort FAY % of student non-proficiency from 09-10 (21.5%) to 10-11 (18.7%), we did not meet the goal.
District Annual Improvement Goals • Increase the percentage of students whose reading comprehension NSS are above the typical NSS increase for grades 4, 8, and 11 as compared to their matched cohort FAY NSS scores in grades 3, 7, and 10 in reading comprehension and mathematics, and in grades 8 and 11 as compared to their matched cohort FAY NSS scores in grades 7 and 10 in science, as measured by the appropriate ITBS and ITED subtests.
GHS Reading Data (AIG) • In 2009-10, 47 students had a National Standard Score “less than typical” (268) in Reading Comprehension in the 10th Grade. • 40 of those students improved their NSS as 11th Graders • However, 18 of the 47 students improved their scores to meet the typical NSS of 275. • RESULT: Goal to increase the percentage of students scoring above the typical NSS was met in Reading Comprehension.
District Annual Improvement Goals Decrease the percentage by 50% of non-proficient students in grades 4, 8, and 11 as compared to their matched cohort FAY percentile scores in grades 3, 7, and 10 in reading comprehension and mathematics, and in grade 8 and 11 as compared to their matched cohort FAY percentile scores in grades 7 and 10 in science, as measured by the appropriate ITBS and ITED subtests.
GHS Math Data (AIG) • In 2009-10, 21 students were considered non-proficient in Math in the 10th Grade. • 13 of those students improved their percentile ranking as 11th Graders • However, only 5 of the 21 students become proficient. • RESULT: Goal to reduce number of non-proficient students by 50% was not met by 6 students in Math • IF we look at the same cohort FAY % of student non-proficiency from 09-10 (16.8%) to 10-11 (19.6%), we did not meet the goal.
District Annual Improvement Goals • Increase the percentage of students whose reading comprehension NSS are above the typical NSS increase for grades 4, 8, and 11 as compared to their matched cohort FAY NSS scores in grades 3, 7, and 10 in reading comprehension and mathematics, and in grades 8 and 11 as compared to their matched cohort FAY NSS scores in grades 7 and 10 in science, as measured by the appropriate ITBS and ITED subtests.
GHS Math Data (AIG) • In 2009-10, 33 students had a National Standard Score “less than typical” (268) in Math in the 10th Grade. • 24 of those students improved their NSS as 11th Graders • However, 9 of the 33 students improved their scores to meet the typical NSS of 275. • RESULT: Goal to increase the percentage of students scoring above the typical NSS in Math was met.