1 / 23

 Inactive and couch potato mutants of Drosophila : Locomotor activity vs metabolism

 Inactive and couch potato mutants of Drosophila : Locomotor activity vs metabolism. Sherry Lee Dr. Jadwiga Giebultowicz Dr. Natraj Krishnan HHMI Summer Program. Circadian Rhythm. Endogenous Period ( per ) and Timeless ( tim ) genes Entrained by exogenous cues – light

maude
Download Presentation

 Inactive and couch potato mutants of Drosophila : Locomotor activity vs metabolism

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1.  Inactive and couch potato mutants of Drosophila:Locomotor activity vs metabolism Sherry Lee Dr. Jadwiga Giebultowicz Dr. Natraj Krishnan HHMI Summer Program

  2. Circadian Rhythm • Endogenous • Period (per) and Timeless (tim) genes • Entrained by exogenous cues – light • Drosophila – crepuscular Dark Light Dark Days jneurosci.org/content/vol26/issue9/images/large/zns0080614060002.jpeg

  3. Feedback Loop From Dr. Jadwiga Giebultowicz

  4. Hypoactive Mutants • Inactive (iav): 70 and 78 • Couch potato (cpo): E023 flybase.bio.indiana.edu

  5. Metabolism • Intracellular – mitochondria • Cellular respiration converts glucose to ATP C6H12O6 (aq) + 6O2 (g) → 6CO2 (g) + 6H2O (l) • Waste products

  6. Activity Links to ROS Production ↑ activity = ↑respiration = ↑reactive oxygen species (ROS) www.sapphirebioscience.com

  7. Rhythmic ROS Production – wild-type END Krishnan N., et al. 2008. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

  8. Objectives • Rhythmic activity compared to wild-type controls (CS) • Rhythmic ROS and ATP productions compared to wild-type controls (CS)

  9. Hypothesis Inactive and couch potato flies have less activity  less metabolism  less ROS and ATP production.

  10. Activity and Longevity • DAM activity monitor with computer data recording • Longevity cages Google images

  11. Mitochondrial H2O2 Production • Mitochondria isolated from whole bodies • Hydrogen peroxide microplate assay Google images

  12. Mitochondria isolated from whole bodies ATP bioluminescence ATP Production Google images

  13. Activity Results - LD • iav and cpo: not hypoactive Fig. 1 Activity graph of three genotypes, 78 iav, 70 iav, and E023 cpo. Horizontal activity vial

  14. Activity Results - LD Fig. 2 CS actogram Fig. 3 78 iav actogram Fig. 5 E023 cpo actogram Fig. 4 70 iav actogram

  15. Activity Results - DD Fig. 6 CS actogram Fig. 7 78 iav actogram Fig. 8 70 iav actogram Fig. 9 E023 cpo actogram

  16. Activity Results - DD % rhythmicity in constant darkness: • 78 iav: 50% (mean = 23.4) • 70 iav: 50% (mean = 23.6) • E023 cpo: 80% (mean = 27.6)

  17. Climbing Ability • iav and cpo: impaired negative geotropic movement iav CS

  18. H2O2 Production Results • iav: more H2O2 than CS • cpo: less H2O2 than iav 8 20 Fig. 10 Rate of H2O2 production for 78, 70, and E023 mutants and CS wild-type flies at ZT8 and ZT20.

  19. ATP Production Results • iav and cpo: more ATP than CS • cpo: more ATP than iav 8 20 Fig. 11 Rate of ATP production for 78, 70, and E023 mutants and CS wild-type flies at ZT8 and ZT20.

  20. Longevity Results • iav: shorter lifespan than CS • cpo: longer lifespan than iav TO BE CONTINUED Fig. 12 Kaplan-Meyer survival curves for 78, 70, and E023 mutants and CS wild-type flies.

  21. Discussion • iav compared with CS • cpo defects • Compare results with Hyperkinetic (Hk)

  22. Significance • Level of beneficial physical activity • ROS production affects longevity • Promotion of healthy aging

  23. Acknowledgements • Dr. Natraj Krishnan • Dr. Jadwiga Giebultowicz • Dr. Kevin Ahern • HHMI Summer Undergraduate Research Program

More Related