450 likes | 549 Views
Earthquake Engineering GE / CEE - 479/679 Lecture 2. Plate Tectonics January 24, 2008. John G. Anderson Professor of Geophysics. Handout Today. Chapter 2. Plate Tectonics Students are advised to read this as your textbook on this topic. Solve exercises 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8.
E N D
Earthquake EngineeringGE / CEE - 479/679Lecture 2. Plate TectonicsJanuary 24, 2008 John G. Anderson Professor of Geophysics
Handout Today • Chapter 2. Plate Tectonics • Students are advised to read this as your textbook on this topic. • Solve exercises 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8. • For extra credit, solve exercises 9, 11. • Exercises are due Jan. 31.
Source: Geological Society of America web: http://www.geosociety.org/science/timescale/timescl.htm
Source: Geological Society of America web: http://www.geosociety.org/science/timescale/timescl.htm
Crust - rocks (granite, basalt); density ~ 3 g/cm3 Lithosphere - "rock-sphere" - rigid layer (includes crust) Asthenosphere - "weak-sphere" (lower v seismic waves) Convection currents flow in the 'plastic' asthenosphere, and the plates of the lithosphere ride on these. Mantle - iron-rich, mainly solid rock Outer core - liquid iron and nickel Inner core - solid iron, nickel Distances are in kilometers. http://www.physics.mcgill.ca/~crawford/PSG/PSG12/204_97_L12.2_earthxn.html
The radii for the tops of the major layers are more accurate on this plot.
http://topex.ucsd.edu/marine_topo/gif_images/global_topo_small.gifhttp://topex.ucsd.edu/marine_topo/gif_images/global_topo_small.gif
Why believe plate tectonics? • Geography - matching continental boundaries. • Geology - units match where continental boundaries match. • Paleomagnetism • Characteristics of the magnetic field • Polar wander • Mid-ocean ridge magnetic anomalies. • Past and future Earth.
Why believe plate tectonics? • Ocean drilling results. • Hot spots • Earthquakes • Direct measurements
Engineering applications • Context to understand seismicity • Quantitative estimate of earthquake rates • Seismic gaps
Distance between two points on the Earth’s surface Where: (φ, ψ) = (latitude, longitude) of selected point on plate boundary (φ1, ψ1) = (latitude, longitude) of pole of relative rotation
u = relative rate of plate motion a = radius of Earth, 6370 km Δ = distance from pole of rotation, in degrees ω = rotation rate of plates about their pole (a different use of the symbol ω)
Seismic Moment • Definition of Seismic Moment • M0=μAD • μ is the shear modulus of the rock • A is the area of the fault on which slip takes place • D is the average slip on the fault
Application to Japan • Accept for the time that the plates in Japan converge at u=10.6 cm/yr. • This is a horizontal convergence rate. • . • The last large earthquake at Tokyo was 1923. • Time past is (2005-1923)=84 years. • Then accumulated slip is: • 10.6 cm/yr*82 yr=890 cm.
Application to Japan (cont.) • Then accumulated slip is: • 10.6 cm/yr*82 yr=890 cm. • Suppose the fault is 200 km long and the seismogenic zone is from 0 to 30 km depth. • The subduction zone dips, lets say at 40o • Width = 30 km/cos(dip)=40 km • M0=μAD = 4*1011 dyne/cm2 * 200 km * 40 km * (105 cm/km)2 * 890 cm = 2.8 * 1028 dyne-cm
Moment Magnitude • MW=(2/3) log M0-10.73 • This is the preferred magnitude scale in the seismological community.
Application to Japan (cont.) • M0=μAD =2.8 * 1028 dyne-cm MW=(2/3) log M0-10.73 =8.24 Conclusion, by these assumptions, there is enough strain accumulated to cause a MW=8.2 earthquake under Tokyo.