260 likes | 370 Views
Materials. Wiki http://pugetsoundesd-rig2.wikispaces.com/. Outcomes. As a group, we will: Create working agreements. Surface hopes and concerns. Learn about the background and purpose of TPEP.
E N D
Materials • Wiki • http://pugetsoundesd-rig2.wikispaces.com/
Outcomes As a group, we will: • Create working agreements. • Surface hopes and concerns. • Learn about the background and purpose of TPEP. • Compare the district’s current evaluation system with the new evaluation system components. Identify key decisions to be made. • Begin to map out an action plan, including a communications plan.
Agenda • Introductions • Working agreements • Core principles • Statewide TPEP information • PSESD RIG • Taking stock: What is already in place? What decisions need to be made? • Communications plan • Next steps
Agreements • Individually write what agreements you would like the group to make in order to create a productive, working environment
Possible Agreements--DRAFT • Be present • Participate actively • Ask questions • Share connections • Listen • Invite and welcome contributions of every member • Work together as a community
TPEP Core Principles • The critical importance of teacher and leadership quality • The professional nature of teaching and leading a school • The complex relationship between the system for teacher and principal evaluation and district systems and negotiations • The belief in professional learning as an underpinning of the new evaluation system • The understanding that the career continuum must be addressed in the new evaluation system • The system must determine the balance of “inputs or acts” and “outputs or results”
Hopes? Concerns? Select two sticky notes. On one, write a hope you have for the teacher and principal evaluation system. On the other, write a concern you have for the teacher and principal evaluation system. Hope Concern
Hopes? Concerns? Number off by threes. Share sticky notes with your group by placing them on the chart paper. Identify any common themes that emerge. Share with large group. What do you notice? Hope Concern
BackgroundTeacher and Principal Evaluation Project (TPEP) Anacortes Central Valley Kennewick North Thurston North Mason Othello Snohomish Wenatchee ESD 101 Consortium Almira Davenport Liberty Medical Lake Pullman Reardan-Edwall Wellpinit Wilbur
PSESD RIG Cohorts • RIG I (2011-2012) Bainbridge, Bellevue, Carbonado, Eatonville, Highline, Issaquah, Renton, Seattle, Shoreline, White River • RIG II-A (Sept 2012-Jan 2013) Auburn, Bethel, Lake Washington, Orting, Peninsula, Sumner • RIG II-B (Jan 2013-June 2013) Dieringer, Federal Way, Fife, Kent, Mercer Island, Puyallup, Skykomish, Snoqualmie Valley, Steilacoom, Tahoma, Tukwila, Vashon,
RIG Content Over Five Sessions • Introduction to Educator Evaluation in Washington • Using Instructional and Leadership Frameworks in Educator Evaluation • Applying Multiple Measures of Performance • Including Student Growth Measures in Educator Evaluation • Conducting High-Quality Observations • Providing High Quality Feedback for Continuous Professional Growth and Development
Taking Stock, Looking Forward • What components of the new system are already in place, and are a foundation to build upon? • What do we need to do over the next eight months to be ready for implementation in the fall?
Communicating our Values “Value” is at the root of the word “evaluation.” What we evaluate needs to come from what we value as a community. Student Learning Educator Growth
Communication Planning • Which stakeholders need to be engaged this month? • What information do they need? • How will that information be communicated?
Whip Around and Plus/Delta Debrief • One word summary of the day • Take a few minutes and create at least two sticky notes for the Plus/Delta Chart on your way out. • Plus: What was a real “plus” of today’s session? What went well and should be repeated? • Delta: Where is there room for improvement and change?