1 / 16

State Review of Transition Data

State Review of Transition Data. 11-30-06 Iowa Department of Education. OSEP Indicator 13. Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.

mbodenhamer
Download Presentation

State Review of Transition Data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. State Review of Transition Data 11-30-06 Iowa Department of Education

  2. OSEP Indicator 13 Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.

  3. OSEP Indicator 14 Percent of youth who had IEPS and are no longer in secondary school and who have been competitively employed, enrolled in some type of postsecondary school, or both, within one year of leaving high school.

  4. Data Collection Cycle 1 year Follow-up (I14) Submit CSIP Senior Exit (I14) IEP Review of 6 Elements (I13) Site Visit YEAR 1 ’07-’08 YEAR 3 Spring, 2005 YEAR 4 Winter, 2006 YEAR 4 Spring/Summer 2006 YEAR 5 ’06-’07 School Yr.

  5. 6 Critical Elements to Determine Indicator 13 • Student preferences and interests • Age appropriate transition assessments • Post-secondary expectations for living, learning and working • Course of Study • Annual goals • Services and supports

  6. Stakeholder Group Participants • Individuals with Disabilities • Parents • IVRS • DHS • Governor’s DD Council • Private Providers • LEAs • AEAs • DE staff

  7. Indicator 13 & 6 Critical Elements

  8. Transition Assessments

  9. Post Secondary Expectations

  10. Course of Study

  11. Goals

  12. Initial Response to Data • What pleases you? • What disappoints you? • Any surprises? • What more do you want to know? • Why might the data look this way?

  13. Digging Deeper in the Data • Where should we begin? • What might be influencing these data? (Why do they look the way they do?) • What will help us make that progress? • What else do we need to know?

  14. 2 Themes Emerged • Begin with Transition Assessments • Articulate a clear message and provide resources/tools for consistent statewide implementation

  15. Transition Assessments: Sample Comments • 3 Possible Reasons • Documentation • Skill • Service Delivery • Involve teachers and other partners • Tie to ongoing initiatives

  16. Transition Assessments:Suggested Activities • Develop a state model of transition assessment • Develop and use awareness materials • Conduct needs assessment for skill acquisition • Conduct needs assessment for service delivery issues • Develop PD approaches and materials based on needs assessment

More Related