1 / 17

The Internet Governance Forum 2013

Discover key points from the 2013 Internet Governance Forum (IGF) where stakeholders tackled internet challenges, surveillance, and cooperation for sustainable development. Get insights on the emerging community spirit, role of governments, and the value of IGF as a platform for open dialogue. Learn about the importance of strengthening the IGF for a healthy internet ecosystem and what to expect for IGF 2014 in Istanbul, Turkey. Join the conversation and shape the future of internet governance!

mchristensen
Download Presentation

The Internet Governance Forum 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Internet Governance Forum 2013 2014-2015 Markus Kummer 13 December 2013

  2. Key characteristics of the 2013 meeting • Theme: “Building Bridges – enhancing multistakeholder cooperation from growth and sustainable development” • Positive reactions (“The best IGF ever”) • Emerging sense of community • IGF tackled the challenges • Widespread government surveillance was the “Elephant in the room” in Bali

  3. Events at IGF 2013 91 Workshops 18 Preevents 18 Open forums 10 Dynamic coalitions 4 Orientation sessions 9 Main sessions 12 Capacity building track events 17 Other events 101 Bilateral meetings A total of 268 events Courtesy of IGF Secretariat

  4. Attendanceat IGF 2013 Media Registration total: 73 Badges issued: 57 Participants Registration total: 1954 Badges issued: 1473 • Remote participation • 162 sessions were wired for remote participantion • 131 sessions had at least one remote participant • 30 remote hubs were present (Australia, Colombia, Argentina, Bangladesh, Egypt, Japan, Uganda, the United States, Papua New Guinea, Thailand, …) Courtesy of IGF Secretariat

  5. Transcripts/Webcasts • All the sessions were webcasted. They are available on the IGF Youtube Channel, at http://www.youtube.com/user/igf/videos?shelf_index=0&view=0&sort=dd • All the transcripts of the sessions are available on the IGF website, at http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/igf-2013-transcripts

  6. Stakeholder groups at IGF 2013 Courtesy of IGF Secretariat

  7. Regionsat IGF 2013 Courtesy of IGF Secretariat

  8. Genderat IGF 2013 Female: 535 Male: 910 Courtesy of IGF Secretariat

  9. Key events driving the 2013 IGF Agenda • World Conference on International Telecom Regulations (WCIT) • Divisive and contentious conference • Need to build bridges between the two camps • > “Building Bridges – enhancing multistakeholder cooperation fro growth and sustainable development” • World Telecommunications Policy Forum (WTPF) • Positive meeting – first step towards “building bridges” • Open issue: “operationalizing role of governments” • Disclosures about widespread government surveillance • Tectonic shift in Internet governance landscape • “Elephant in the room” in Bali

  10. “WCIT leftovers” • Spam was identified as a problem in Dubai. • IGF 2014 took up the issue in depth • Solutions are available to address these problems. • Proposal to have technical training workshops at the IGF 2014.

  11. Role of governments • Role of governments is a key issue in Internet governance debate. • WSIS: Internet governance should involve all stakeholders “in their respective roles”. • Bali discussions revealed broad agreement that governments have a role to play: • regulatory environment, • building of infrastructure, • enforcing human rights, • fostering multistakeholder cooperation.

  12. Government surveillance • General agreement on the need to rebuild trust. • IGF provided space for open discussions on a delicate issue. • Emerging consensus on the need for developing high level principles. • Agreement on the importance to continue multistakeholder discussions.

  13. Sense of emerging community spirit • Hyderabad 2008: Mumbai terrorist attacks – solidarity with India. • Bali 2013: • Surveillance seen as a threat to the Internet itself. • Need to rebuild trust. • Feeling that the IGF is the privileged place to pursue these discussions.

  14. Value of the IGF • IGF as a one-stop-shop for inter-stakeholder dialogue • Platform for an open and frank dialogue to discuss difficult issues. • Place for ‘soft governance’ - for exchanging information and sharing best current practices. • Sharing best practices on how to deal with spam is more efficient than a treaty article!

  15. Need to strengthen the IGF • IGF Secretariat operates on a shoestring – understaffed and underfunded. • Financial problems of this year’s host managed to catalyze broad support. • Urgent need to strengthen capacity of IGF Secretariat and put it on a stable and sustainable financial basis. • The IGF is an “indispensable part of the Internet ecosystem” (ISOC Board of Trustees). • A healthy IGF is necessary for a healthy Internet!

  16. IGF 2014 • The planning for the 2014 meeting has begun. • Stocktaking – “what worked well, what worked less well in Bail?” • Questionnaire available on the IGF website. • Location for the 2014 meeting: Istanbul, Turkey. • Proposed dates: 1st week of September. • Next Open Consultations and MAG Meeting: • 19-20 February 2014 in Geneva, Switzerland.

  17. Markus Kummer The Internet Society Thank you. 13 December 2013

More Related