1 / 23

Status of photon sensor study at Niigata University -- SiPM and MPPC --

Status of photon sensor study at Niigata University -- SiPM and MPPC --. Photon sensor mini workshop 05/9/16 (Fri) @Kyoto University Niigata University HEP-Lab Sayaka IBA Editha P. Jacosalem (Mindanao-U), Hiroaki Ono, Noriko Nakajima, Hitoshi Miyata. Contents. Study at Niigata university

mckenzie-alvarado
Download Presentation

Status of photon sensor study at Niigata University -- SiPM and MPPC --

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status of photon sensor studyat Niigata University-- SiPM and MPPC -- Photon sensor mini workshop 05/9/16 (Fri) @Kyoto University Niigata University HEP-Lab Sayaka IBA Editha P. Jacosalem (Mindanao-U), Hiroaki Ono, Noriko Nakajima, Hitoshi Miyata

  2. Contents • Study at Niigata university • SiPM study • Signal • Sensor signal uniformity dependence • MPPC study • Signal • Laser intensity dependence • Sensor signal uniformity dependence • Summary and future plan

  3. Fine segmentation scintillator Read out by photon sensor 1. Study at Niigata university • Present design of GLD Calorimeter • We might need smaller segmentation calorimeter • 10x40x2mm strip type scinti MPPC MPPC MPPC -> Study of photon sensor (by Iba) Scintillator (by Editha-san) X, Z-layer strip scinti: 10x200x2mm Tile-layer: 40x40x1mm This granularity will be checked by simulation soon

  4. 2. SiPM Study

  5. 34x34 =1156pixels 2mm A 2mm 1.2mm K 1.2mm SiPM from Russia Wire Bonding • Using SiPM for read out • Micro Avalanche Photo Diode (APD) • Each pixel in Geiger mode • Compact • Suitable for WLS fiber readout • 34x34=1156 pixels in small area • Pixel Size : 30x30um • High Gain : ~106 • Operational at low voltage : 60~70V about 30um

  6. Setup YAG laser& scan table system Logic YAG Laser Wave length & power: 532nm (10mJ/cm2), 1064nm (20mJ/cm2) Use filter : down to10-8 Trigger : from Laser system Pulse width : <10nsec Spot size : <2um Precision of laser position : ±2um Output Circuit

  7. Signal of laser(1064nm, 532nm) • 532nm signal is smaller than 1064nm • 532nm result has many noise than 1064nm • Rise time : ~10ns • Fall time : ~200ns 532nm 65.0V 20mV 10mV 50nsec 50nsec 1064nm65.0V 532nm 66.0V 10mV 50nsec

  8. Fluctuation histogram Laser hitting area (3x3=9 pixel) 5x5 pixel area Sensor signal uniformity dependent • Laser wave length : 1064nm • Sensor bias : 66.5V • 49points (7x7points) were measured • Deviation (RMS) : ~28% • Laser output fluctuation range : ~10% • Central part showed higher PH

  9. Y-axis line 4 X-axis line4 Cross sectional view • Cross section of X-axis line 4 and Y-axis line 4 Cutting X-axis line-4 Cutting Y-axis line-4

  10. 3. MPPC Study

  11. MPPC 400pixels ~100um ~85um MPPC 100pixels (10x10pixels) MPPC from HPK • MPPC :Multi Pixels Photon Counter • Made by HPK and under development • Compact device • Works with much lower voltage than PMT (~50V) • Suitable for wavelength shifter fiber • We have two types of MPPC • 100pixels : 10x10pixels • 400pixels : 20x20pixels

  12. Setup Logic readout YAG Laser MPPC YAG Laser Wave length & power: 532nm (10mJ/cm2), 1064nm (20mJ/cm2) Filter : Laser intensity is down to10-8 Trigger : from Laser system Pulse width : <10nsec Laser beam minimum spot size : <2um Precision of laser position : ±2um MPPC Output circuit

  13. 0pixel (0photon) 1pixel (1photon) 2pixel (2photon) Signal • Rise time : ~10ns, Fall time : ~500ns + tail • From the ADC graph, we calculated the Charge output of 1pixel which is ~ 2.5pc and Gain is ~1.6x107 for 100pixels MPPC 10mV signal 500nsec trigger View from oscilloscope MPPC : 100pixels From ADC signal MPPC : 100pixeｌs

  14. Laser intensity dependence • For getting the best laser intensity corresponding to 1photon injection • Measurement conditions • MPPC : 100pixels • Pixel position : center (X=5,Y=6) • Laser hitting area : within the 1pixel • Wavelength : 532nm • Used filter : for laser intensity down to10-8 • We think laser intensity 160 corresponds to 1photon injection, because this value is beginning of max of 1photon and min of 0photon Laser intensity 160 for 1photon injection Efficiency of 0pe, 1pe vs. Laser intensity ● : Efficiency of 0photon event ▲ : Efficiency of more than 1photon event

  15. Pixel signal uniformity in one pixel (Position dependence between two pixels) • Checked efficiency between two pixels as uniformity measurement • Scanned 7points between two pixels • Wavelength : 532nm • Sensor bias : 49.0V • Efficiency of more than 1photon event becomes minimum at the boundary line between 2pixels Efficiency vs Position ▲: Efficiency of 0photon event ●: Efficiency of ≧1photon event Efficiency = # of 0 or 1photon event / # of All events pixel pixel

  16. ~85um ~30um ~35um Laser hitting area (smaller than 1pixel) Sensor signal uniformity dependent on the pixel locations • Injected laser single photon to each pixel and got response • Measurement conditions • MPPC : 100pixels • Sensor bias : 49.0V • Laser wavelength : 532nm, Intensity : 160 • Laser hitting area is smaller than 1pixel area • Measured points are 50points that are shown as gray area Measured points : 50points (Gray pixels)

  17. Pulse Height 1photon mean 0photon mean • Pulse height = 1photon mean value – 0photon mean value • Deviation of PH (RMS) : 10% • Laser long term fluctuation : ≦5% Pulse height vs Pixel position # of pixels Distribution of the PH

  18. Cross sectional view (Central part) • Cross section of X-axis (line-5 + line-6) and Y-axis (line-5 + line-6) which are shown in previous slide • Central part of sensor Y-axis line-5+6 Cutting X-axis line-5▲ + line-6▲ X-axis line-5 +6 Cutting Y-axis line-5▲ + line-6▲

  19. Y-axis line-9+10 X-axis line-9 +10 Cross sectional view (Edge part) Cutting X-axis line-9▲ + line-10▲ • Cross section of X-axis (line-9 + line-10) and Y-axis (line-9 + line-10) • Edge of sensor • We can see that pulse height level and deviation look same as previous slide Cutting Y-axis line-9▲ + line-10▲

  20. Position dependence of efficiency • Compare efficiencies between 0photon events and more than 1photon events • Efficiency = #of 0photon (or ≧1photon) event / #of all photon events • Edge of sensor shows low signal efficiency • Central area of sensor has good efficiency Efficiency : 0photon Efficiency : ≧1photon

  21. Intensity dependence at other points Efficiency of more than 1photon event vs. Laser intensity position X=5,Y=10 eff: too bad Eff. 160 Intensity Efficiency : 0photon position X=8,Y=9 eff: poor position X=4,Y=3 eff: good flat region flat region 160 160

  22. Pulse height vs. Laser intensity position X=5,Y=10 eff: too bad Eff. 160 Intensity Efficiency : 0photon position X=8,Y=9 eff: poor position X=4,Y=3 eff: good down 160 160

  23. 4. Summary and future plan • SiPM study (position dependence) • PH uniformity was 28%(RMS), while laser fluctuation was 10% • Edge part showed low PH • MPPC study (pixel position & intensity dependence) • PH uniformity was 10% (RMS), while laser long term fluctuation was less than 5% • Central part of a sensor had good efficiency while edge part showed inefficiency in the light collection • For poor efficiency pixels, their efficiency don’t increase and PH decreases as intensity increases • Future of Niigata study • Try to connect scintillator strip and MPC through Wavelength-shifter fiber and to do beta-ray test • Measure more detail for 400pixels

More Related