1 / 18

Implementation of SDoC in Korea's Automotive Sector

This document discusses the implementation of Self-Declaration of Conformity (SDoC) in Korea's automotive sector, including vehicle safety standards, regulatory practices, harmonization efforts, and the streamlining of conformity assessments. It also explains the benefits and process of SDoC, as well as the recall system for ensuring compliance.

mcover
Download Presentation

Implementation of SDoC in Korea's Automotive Sector

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Implementation of SDoC in Korea’s Automotive Sector March 21, 2005 Woo-jin Jung Ministry of Construction & Transportation Republic of Korea

  2. Contents 1. Vehicle Safety Standards 2. Korea’s regulatory practice 3. Harmonization of Safety Standards 4. Conformity Assessment Streamlining 5. Conclusion

  3. Reduce Protect Environment (Emission/Noise ) Accidents / Casualties Vehicle Safety Standards SAFETY STANDARDS

  4. Europe U.S. Nation Regulations KOREA Standards FMVSS Standards Standards EEC Directives ECE Regulations Vehicle Safety Standards & Conformity Assessment Procedure Most countries have their own vehicle safety standards & conformity assessment procedure, often resulting in technical barriers to trade.

  5. Government decides to take action Korea’s Regulatory Practice Differences in safety standards and conformity assessment procedure burdens to both the government and manufacturers

  6. Action Taking International Harmonization of Vehicle Safety Standards - Join UN/ECE/WP.29 - Participate in APEC/RTHP(Road Transport Harmonization Project) - Establish cooperative relationship with other countries (EU, US, Japan, China etc.) Conformity Assessment Streamlining - Switchover from Type Approval System to Self-certification System (SDoC)

  7. International Harmonization Trend Rule-making Activities UN/ECE WP29 1958 Agreement 6 Expert Meetings GRE, GRSP, GRRF GRSG, GRPE, GRB Exchange Information 1998 Agreement International Cooperation APEC (RTHP) Harmonization of Safety Standards

  8. Harmonization Activities UN/ECEWP29 • ’96. 6 : First participation in WP29 • ’01. 1. 1. : Accession to 1998 agreement • ’04. 12.31 : Accession to 1958 agreement APEC/TPT/RTHP • ’96. 11 : First participation in 10th meeting • ’02. 9 : Elected chairman • Chairmanship : 22nd(’03.9) – 24th(’04.8)

  9. Basis for implementing SDoC • Technical level of manufacturers in vehicle industry • Consumers’ awareness level Before overall implementation of SDoC, Recall System (PL) was introduced in 1992 Conformity Assessment Streamlining Implementation of self-certification (SDoC) : 2003. 1. 1

  10. Expected Effects of Self-certification Manufacturer To improve flexibility to market - reduce costs and time associated with testing Government To save regulatory costs- meet policy objectives such as safety of consumers & protection of the environment ※ To facilitate international trade of automobiles by avoiding unnecessary obstacles

  11. Registration Manufacturer/importer registers laboratory with the MOCT before manufacturing or importing vehicles. Self-Certification Labels affixed to vehicles upon declaration by the manufacturer/importer that the vehicles are in compliance with all applicable safety standards Notification of Vehicle Specification Manufacturer/importer notifies the MOCT of vehicle specifications before selling vehicles Process of Self-Certification

  12. When is a recall necessary? 1. Motor vehicle does not comply with safety standards. 2. Safety-related defects exist in the vehicles. Annual plan Information Collection Manufacturer decides to recall Compliance Test Defect Investigation Owner Notification Advisory Committee on Vehicle Recalls Progress Report to MOCT Hearing Order to Recall (Minister of MOCT) Completion How to ensure compliance – Recall System

  13. Compliance Test Selecting TestVehicle Criterion: Large volume of sale Test Analysis Final Report Manufacturers given opportunities for defense Hearing Recall & Penalty

  14. Defect Investigation - Complaints from consumers - Report from vehicle inspection center Data Gathering Initial Analysis Preliminary Investigation Defect Investigation Final Report Hearing Manufacturers given opportunities for defense Recall & Penalty

  15. Recall Process Order to Recall Submit Remedy Action Plan to the Authorities - Vehicle manufacturer is obliged to rectify defects & noncompliance at his costs. - Quarterly status report to be submitted to MOCT until the recall is completed. Conduct Recall Maximum fine of $1 million may be imposed as additional penalty Completion

  16. Recall Statistics in Korea - Active market surveillance mechanism by consumers resulted in increase of recalled vehicles since 2000. - Major cause of recall was safety related defects rather than noncompliance.

  17. Conclusion • Vehicle Safety Standards & Conformity Assessment • Procedured have become very important in Korea. • In keeping with Philosophy of the TBT Agreement, • Korean government has - harmonized with international safety standards. - implemented SDoC in automotive sector.

  18. Thank You Very Much (Q & A) E-mail : lucas7@moct.go.kr

More Related