1 / 17

James R. Anderson, PhD Environmental Fluid Dynamics Program Arizona State University

Targeted Monitoring, Outreach, and Education: Traditional Brick Kilns, San Luis Rio Colorado, Sonora. James R. Anderson, PhD Environmental Fluid Dynamics Program Arizona State University. Funding from BECC (2007) and USEPA (2006) In collaboration with:

mea
Download Presentation

James R. Anderson, PhD Environmental Fluid Dynamics Program Arizona State University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Targeted Monitoring, Outreach, and Education: Traditional Brick Kilns, San Luis Rio Colorado, Sonora James R. Anderson, PhD Environmental Fluid Dynamics Program Arizona State University

  2. Funding from BECC (2007) and USEPA (2006) In collaboration with: Arizona Dept. of Environmental Quality and Regional Center for Border Health, Inc.

  3. Outline: • Review of monitoring results from 2006 study. • New results on lead emissions from kilns. • 3. Plans for 2007 indoor monitoring, education, and outreach.

  4. Background • Approx. 130 brick kiln sites in the urban area of San Luis Rio Colorado, Sonora, concentrated within three small colonias ladrilleras. • Brick-makers’ families live at the brick-making sites. • Some of the local schools are either near to or surrounded by brick kiln sites.

  5. Active burning stage – about 1 day, black smoke dominated by soot, fine soil dust, and “brown carbon”. Smoldering phase another 2 days. Plume tends to stay close to surface for significant distances.

  6. Fuels – anything that burns, but wood and particle board are favored because of brick quality that results. 1. Particle board scrap (with plastic facing) 2. Unpainted wood 3. Painted wood from demolition of old buildings (4. Old tires.)

  7. Suumary of Results from 2006 Study • PM10 concentrations on the order of 2000 g/m3 or higher are emitted from kilns near ground level during the active burning and smoldering phases of brick making in the colonias. (Highest PM10 was about 4000 g/m3 ) • During active burning and smoldering, about 70% of the PM10 measured was present as PM2.5 and therefore easily respired. • During certain periods of sampling, high concentrations of fine particles with significant lead content were detected, mostly in the form of lead chloride. • d. Canister samples found elevated concentrations of a number of organic gases in kiln smoke relative to ambient background (such as1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene).

  8. While we did not directly measure the mass loading of Pb, a reasonable estimate from this data is that in an actively burning plume with 2000-4000 g/m3 PM10 the Pb content might be on the order of 50-100 g/m3 Current Pb standard in both US and Mexico is a quarterly average of 1.5 g/m3 While this standard may or may not be exceeded in the colonias, what are the health effects of repeated exposures to high levels of Pb?

  9. 2007 project plans with RCBH collaboration: • Indoor PM10 monitoring of 2 houses and at school • Questionnaire for residents of 2 studied colonias to assess awareness of health issues, including awareness of Pb toxicity. • Development of outreach materials. • Education and outreach activities in 2 colonias. • Also, compilation of health and school absentee data from area around colonias by working with Sec. de Salud Publica

  10. Goals: • Document health hazards associated with current brick making methods. • Develop outreach materials that emphasize risks to children's health from the kiln smoke. • Convince brick makers to stop using painted boards as fuel. • Contribute to the on-going effort by city and state officials to reduce the health risks from kiln operations.

More Related