1 / 33

Electromagnetic Calorimeter for HADES at SIS100: MAMI and CERN test results

A. Kr á sa , F. Křížek, A. Kugler , J. Pietraszko , Y. Sobolev , J. Stanislav, P . Tlustý , T. Torrieri (NPI Řež ) , M. Golubeva , F. Guber , A. Ivashkin , K. Lapidus , A. Reshet in (INP Moscow), J. Pietraszko (IKF Frankfurt).

mead
Download Presentation

Electromagnetic Calorimeter for HADES at SIS100: MAMI and CERN test results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A. Krása, F. Křížek, A. Kugler, J. Pietraszko, Y. Sobolev, J. Stanislav, P. Tlustý, T. Torrieri (NPI Řež) , M. Golubeva, F. Guber, A. Ivashkin, K. Lapidus, A. Reshetin (INP Moscow), J. Pietraszko (IKF Frankfurt) Electromagnetic Calorimeter for HADES at SIS100:MAMI and CERN test results • Lead-glass modules • Tests • - gbeam at MAMI energy resolution • - p-/e- beam at MAMI particle separation • Outlook HADES ECAL Workshop, Frankfurt a.M., October 14-15, 2010

  2. Detector modules Our proposal is to use lead glass modules from OPAL end cap calorimeter. ~ 900 modules needed, at present 1080 modules moved to GSI. Module dimensions: 42 x 9.2 x 9.2 cm Energy resolution ~ 5%/sqrt(E), E in GeV Signal Read-out PMT - EMI 9903KB (1.5'') from MIRAC (WA98 hadron calorimeter) ~720 PMT's diameter – 38 mm (1.5'') diameter of photocathode – 34 mm Front-end readout – ADC ADD-ON (Shower)+ TRB

  3. Detector modules EMI9903KB: 1.5” tube from MIRAC (WA98) H1949: 2.5” tube from HADES Tofino Lead glass dimensions: 9.2 x 9.2 x 42 cm

  4. Tests– cosmic muons Source – cosmicsmuons: energy≈ 2 GeV, energydeposit in module ≈ 200 MeV, Cerenkov lightoutputcorrespondsto≈577 MeVelectrons count rate ≈ 20 particles / hour Measurement of pulse height (ADC) spectra – check ofenergyresolution various PMTs, configurationwith/withoutlightguide July 2009 - testof 5 modulesbeforethe MAMI test November 2009 - testof 5 modules after the MAMI test December 2009 - testofonemodulewith PMTs (same type) withvariousgains, variouswrappings March 2010 – nowtestofmodulesproducedforone LG HADES sector

  5. cosmics - moduleNo.4 July 2009 • s = 5.4 ± 0.2 % Nov. 2009 • s = 5.3 ± 0.2 %

  6. Cosmic tests - results Cherenkov light from cosmicsmuons is equivalent to 577 MeV electrons resolution 6.5% on cosmics corresponds to 5% for electrons at 1000 MeV assuming 5%/sqrt(E), E in GeV

  7. MAMI g beam test conditions Purpose: to measure the module energy resolution as a function of g energy Beam: - detectors were positioned in the secondary gamma beam with continuous energy distribution from 0 to primary electron beam energy, with intensity exponentially falling with increasing energy - unless stated otherwise, the detectors were hit in the centre of their front side, and the beam proceeded along their longitudinal axis - beam diameter at detector position – 6 mm diameter Trigger: OR of signals from 8 selected scintillators in electron tagger – giving events with 8 known gamma energies in range from 0 to energy of the electron beam 2 days of measurement: Ee- = 855 MeV, Ig = 25 kHz 2) Ee- = 1508 MeV, Ig = 5 kHz

  8. MAMI test setup Beam: detectors were positioned in the secondary gamma beam with continuous energy (intensity exponentially falling with increasing energy) Trigger: OR of signals from 8 selected scintillators in electron tagger – giving events with 8 known gamma energies in range from 0 to energy of the electron beam

  9. MAMI test setup Left up: test setup Left down: crew Right: detail with detectors, movable table and beam halo (looking in beam direction)

  10. Measured g spectra ALL E= 1399MeV E= 1210MeV counts E= 1021MeV E= 831MeV E= 676MeV E= 452MeV E= 261MeV E= 72.1MeV ADC channel Ee=1508 MeV, g energy spread <= 1%, det. module No.1

  11. Energy calibration Ee= 1508 MeV

  12. Resolution vs. Energy Ee= 855 MeV resolution ~ k . 1/sqrt(E)

  13. Resolution vs. Energy Ee= 1508 MeV resolution ~ k . 1/sqrt(E)

  14. Resolution vs. Energy Module No.1 resolution ~ k . 1/sqrt(E) LE: Ee= 855 MeV HE: Ee= 1508 MeV cosmics: cosmics muons

  15. Resolution vs. Energy Module No.4 resolution ~ k . 1/sqrt(E) LE: Ee= 855 MeV HE: Ee= 1508 MeV cosmics: cosmics muons

  16. Beam and cosmic tests - results

  17. Resolution vs. HV Ee= 1508 MeV, module No.1 resolution ~ k . 1/sqrt(E)

  18. Resolution vs. beam position Ee= 855 MeV, module No.1 No.1 No.2 01234 reading only module No.1 reading modules No.1+2

  19. CERN p-/e- beam test conditions Purpose: to measure the electron/pion separation as a function of momentum to measure the lead glass module time resolution, 5 identical modules tested (glass+opticalgrease+EMI) Beam: - the T10 test beam line of the CERN PS synchrotron was used - pi- with momenta 0.4 – 6 GeV/c with admixture of electrons (increasing at lower momenta) - detectors were positioned in the pion beam - the detectors were hit in the centre of their front side, and the beam proceeded along their longitudinal axis - beam diameter at detector position – 4x4 cm defined by a trigger scintillator - triggered beam intensity: 100-1000 particles/ bunch, 1 bunch per 45 sec. ID: 2 m long gas Cherenkov in beam, placed 120 cm in front of lead glass, efficiency for electrons 98% Trigger: OR of signals from 2 scintillators 4x4 cm Momentum settings: 0.4-2 GeV/c

  20. Test of lead glass - CERNMay2010 Test setup on T10 CERN PS beam line Beam – pi- with momenta 400-2000MeV/c with admixture of electrons

  21. CERN test setup Right: T10 beam line Left: details with detectors

  22. Measured e/p spectra – CERNMay2010 Red – electrons green – pi- separation via gas Cherenkov ADC channel Electron peaks look worse than gamma peaks at MAMI The electron peak has long energy tail due to energy loss of electrons in air (~15m) and other detectors in T10 area.

  23. Measured e/p spectra – CERNMay2010 ADC channel Same as before, but e/pi- spectra normalized to the same yield

  24. e/p separation 2 sigma cut set on the electron peak Ratio of pions outside the cut to all pions is plotted For “RPC” the time-of-flight is used with assumed resolution of 100 ps (sigma) SHOWER

  25. Energy resolution – CERNMay2010 Ee [MeV] Looks a little worse than for gamma beam test – The electron peak has long energy tail due to energy loss of electrons in air (~15m) and other detectors in T10 area.

  26. Time resolution – CERNMay2010 e- 800 MeV START signal – quarz detector, resolution < 100 ps TDC gain – 50 ps / channel

  27. Summary • detector prototypes tested by •  cosmic muons • gamma beam • pion/electron beam • results • optimal detector configuration found •  detector energy resolution close to 5% at 1 GeV  e/p separation better than the SHOWER detector, in combination with RPC excellent separation •  detector time resolution 215 ps (sigma)

  28. Design • Number of modules 150x6=900 • Mass of one module of lead-glass14 kg • Total mass of cal. 12600 kg E. Lisowski, TU Krakow

  29. Cosmic test setup lead glass module trigger detectors count rate: ~ 20 particles / hour

  30. Cosmic muon ADC spectra our data Fermilab E760 Central Calorimeter module length 50 cm σ/Nmean= 5.4 % σ/Nmean≈ 7 % OPAL e- 1 GeV Np.e.≈ 1800 s ≈ 5% E760 e- 1 GeV Np.e.≈ 4250 s ≈ 5% E760 m≈ 2 GeV Np.e.≈ 2082 s ≈ 7% http://www.e835.to.infn.it/people/gollwitz/thesis/ K. Gollwitzer, PhD thesis, University of California at Irvine, 1993

  31. PMT Tests PMT EMI 9903KB (1.5'') ~720 PMTs available 500 PMTs tested HV dependence of PMT response: PMT alone at HV=1500 and 1700 V, PMT with a gamma-source 22Na at HV=1200, 1500, and 1700 V; The results for HV=1500 V: <500 mV 79 pieces of PMTs 16% 500 mV < U < 1500 mV 120 pieces of PMTs 1500 mV < U < 2700 mV 191 pieces of PMTs >2700 mV 110 pieces of PMTs

  32. Energy resolution and hadron rejection of the OPAL end cap calorimeter Energy resolution of the OPAL lead glass modules is 5%/sqrt(E), E in GeV) Hadron rejection below 10 GeV was not measured.

  33. Simulated e/p spectra K. Lapidus

More Related