1 / 26

Star Formation History of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field

Star Formation History of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. Rodger Thompson Steward Observatory University of Arizona. Blameless Collaborators. Mark Dickinson Daniel Eisenstein Xiaohui Fan Garth Illingworth Rob Kennicutt Marcia Rieke. The star formation intensity distribution function

media
Download Presentation

Star Formation History of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Star Formation History of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field Rodger Thompson Steward Observatory University of Arizona

  2. Blameless Collaborators • Mark Dickinson • Daniel Eisenstein • Xiaohui Fan • Garth Illingworth • Rob Kennicutt • Marcia Rieke

  3. The star formation intensity distribution function Star formation history of the HUDF Nature of the star forming galaxies The near infrared background Topics

  4. Purpose of the Program • Track the evolution of baryons from gas to stars • Determine the major venues and epochs of star formation • What galaxies form the most stars? Episodic or steady? • Is there a near infrared background? • What constraints do the observations place on Pop. III star formation?

  5. The HUDF and NUDF • The Hubble Ultra Deep Field (HUDF) is a small area (~11 sq. min.) centered on the Chandra Deep Field South with deep ACS images in 4 broad optical bands. • The NICMOS Ultra Deep Field (NUDF) is a smaller area (~6 sq. min) near the center of the HUDF with deep images at 1.1 and 1.6 mm. • All results discussed here come from the NUDF

  6. The F775W Mag. vs Redshift AGN

  7. Characteristics of the Galaxies • Preponderance of very early SEDs • Little blue galaxies • Very few L > L* galaxies • Few z > 6 galaxies • Partly due to relatively conservative source extraction. • Very few luminous galaxies with z > 3 compared to the NHDF

  8. Star Formation Rates • Star formation rate determined from the rest frame 1500 Å flux via the Madau relation. • The flux is measured from the selected SED without extinction to produce an extinction corrected SFR.

  9. Star Formation Intensity Distribution • The star formation intensity x is the SFR in M per year per proper square kpc. • The distribution function h(x) is the sum of all proper areas in an x interval, divided by that interval and divided by the comoving volume defined by the field and redshift interval.* • Under this definition SFR is the first moment of h(x); SFR = ∫x h(x) dx * Lanzetta et al. 1999, ASP Conf. Ser. 191, 223

  10. Application of the Distribution • The SFR is calculated for every pixel that is part of a galaxy. • Assumes a uniform SED and extinction within a galaxy • Assumes that the rest frame 1500 Å light is distributed in the same way as the observed flux in the ACS F775W band.

  11. Star Formation Density Redshift = 1 95% complete 60% complete Log(h(x)) Starburst Log Star Formation Intensity x in M per year per kpc2 About 80% of the stars are formed in a “starburst region”

  12. The Observed h(x)

  13. Correction for Surface Brightness Dimming • The (1+z)-4 photon surface brightness dimming removes galaxies and parts of galaxies from detection. • This is the cause of the dip in h(x) at low values of x for z >1. • The SFR can be corrected for this effect by matching the h(x) determined for z=1 to the bright end of the h(x) at other z values and integrating over the matched distribution.

  14. Star Formation History of the NUDF

  15. How is the Star Formation Distributed? • 90% of the star formation occurs in 10-20% of the galaxies. • The percentage increases with redshift, probably because of dimming. • Evidence for episodic star formation with a duty cycle of 10%?

  16. Comparison with the NHDF

  17. SFR History of the Universe • Roughly constant from z = 1 to 6 • Average of z = 1 to 3 higher than 4 to 6 • Since most of the star formation occurs in ~10% of the galaxies, wider but shallower surveys may map the majority of star formation

  18. Near Infrared Background Excess • Claims of a Near InfraRed Background (NIRBE) of ~70 nW m-2 sr-1, not due to known galaxies, stars or zodiacal light, that peaks at 1.4-1.6 mm. • Resolved objects in the NUDF and NHDF contribute 6-7 nW m-2 sr-1, a factor of 10 below the claimed background. • Fluctuations in deep 2MASS images claimed as evidence for a population of very high redshift (10-15) Pop. III stars. (Kashlinsky et al. 2006)

  19. Implications of the NIRB • Most popular model for the NIRB is the light from the high redshift Pop. III stars that reionized the universe. • Requires that the total number of baryons turned into stars in the first 3% of the age of the universe be greater than or equal to the total number of baryons converted to stars in the remaining 97%. • The metals produced by this conversion must be hidden in black holes. • There must be no x-ray producing accretion onto the black holes. • The NIRB must not interact with TeV emission from distant blazars.

  20. Fluctuation Analysis

  21. Results of the Fluctuation Analysis • The fluctuations observed in the 2MASS field can be completely accounted for by the redshift 0-7 galaxies such as those observed in the NUDF • There is no need for an excess population of high redshift Pop.III stars to account for the fluctuations • Fluctuations have been removed as evidence for a NIRBE at 1.6 mm

  22. The IRTS NIRBE • Wide field of view spectrometer • Aperture almost 17 times the size of the NUDF • Zodiacal light and contributions from sources determined from models • After subtraction of modeled components, 70 out of 330 nW m-2 sr-1 remain and is attributed to a NIRBE

  23. The NIRBE According to IRTS

  24. Differences • The zodiacal component determined by medianed images in the NUDF exceeds the IRTS modeled component by 100 nW m-2 sr-1. • Dwek et al. 2006 point out that the IRTS spectrum is better fit by a zodiacal spectrum than a high z Pop.III spectrum. • The IRTS NIRBE is most likely due to an under estimate of the zodiacal light component by the model.

  25. Caveats • A NIRBE component that is flat on scales of greater than 100” would be mistaken for zodiacal light in our reduction. • At odds with CMB predictions • A NIRBE component that is clumped on the order of several arc minutes could be missed by our two small fields. • Archival proposal to check other fields • However the light in a NIRB can not be distributed in the same manner as the light from baryonic matter at redshifts of 6 and less.

  26. Conclusions • The star formation history of the universe is roughly constant from z=1-6. • The vast majority of star formation occurs in a minority of galaxies at any one time. • Fluctuations have been removed as evidence for a NIRBE at 1.6 mm. • The IRTS NIRBE is probably zodiacal flux. • Any NIRBE must be either maximally flat or maximally clumped.

More Related