170 likes | 547 Views
Trucking and Rail-freight Can we restore the balance ? Natalie Litwin -President Daniel Hammond - Past President Transport Action Ontario Can we restore the balance ? If rail transport is so efficient and great for the environment, why did trucks come to dominant freight transport?
E N D
Trucking and Rail-freight Can we restore the balance? Natalie Litwin -President Daniel Hammond - Past President Transport Action Ontario
Can we restore the balance? • If rail transport is so efficient and great for the environment, why did trucks come to dominant freight transport? • Can we have an environmentally sustainable freight transport system without bankrupting us? • Can this be done while stimulating economic growth?
How we got here • Railways once the dominant mode of inland freight transport • Mechanized rail superior to animal drawn road transport for all but the shortest distances • Most businesses that used freight services once located near rail lines or spurs to avoid use of real horse-power cartage
How we got here • Mechanization of road transport in the 20th Century created development away from rail lines and terminals • Rail remained as the dominant carrier of freight • Manufacturers, warehouses remained next to the rail lines
How we got here • Just-in-time delivery of freight is not new • In 1946, the New York Central Railway introduced Pacemaker service • Overnight delivery thru-out most of New York state (with steam powered trains!) • Myth debunked that rail cannot provide “just-in-time” service
How we got here • By 1950, Pacemaker service was extended to St. Louis, Chicago, Detroit, Toronto, Montreal, Cleveland, Toledo • With delivery times as good as the best ever offered by the trucking industry • All on infrastructure that was built and maintained with private capital
How we got here • In 1956, US President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed the Federal-Aid Highway Act into law • Railways now have to compete for capital and traffic with the largest public works program in history
How we got here • In retrospect, did the railways protect the interests of their shareholders during the debate of the Federal-Aid Highway Act ? • Would today’s AT&T, Rogers, Verizon and Bell Canada stand by while a public financed cell phone or fibre optic network was constructed?
We are Here • Public financed infrastructure • Advances in automotive technology • Government policies favouring highway transport (including permitting ever larger vehicles) and requiring railways to maintain an extensive network despite declining traffic • Caused a massive shift of freight traffic from rail to road • The myth that the free market chose highway transport is now busted
We are Here • Less traffic with a post-war sized network, along with less access to capital (competition with government and the road transport companies for capital) • Quality of this extensive rail network declined rapidly • Delivery times lengthened and railways lost very profitable time sensitive traffic to highways with the decline accelerating in this viscous circle
We are Here • Staggers Act of 1980 reduced the regulation of railway industry • This regulatory freedom permitted reduction of rail network • Financially stronger railways improved the network that remained
We are Here • Exportation of manufacturing • Growth of container shipping • Big box retail • Double-stack container trains • Caused an explosion in rail traffic • Shatters the myth that consumer goods are not handled by railways
We are Here • Few terminals equipped to handle double stack container trains equals truck hauls the same or longer as when goods where manufactured in USA and Canada
Where We Want to Be • Reduce fuel use (less CO2 and other emissions, less dependence on foreign petroleum) • Reduce costs • Reduce land use
Where We Want to Be • Rail uses 1/7th the energy to move freight • Rail can be electrified (less, or no, foreign oil, use of wind or solar generated) • Rail is less effected by weather • Rail is much higher in labour and land use productivity • Secondary railways for local freight and public transit can be constructed for less than an arterial road • Technology exists for economic rail short-haul of freight and international intermodal containers
Where We Want to Be – A Plan to Get There • Reduce public spending on highways • Spending reduced to a level that maintains existing infrastructure • Halt new projects and expansion • Avoid use of PPP (Public Private Partnership) to creatively finance uneconomic/non-sustainable projects
Where We Want to Be – A Plan to Get There • Tax and policy incentives for investments in local intermodal terminals, (reduce truck haul), electrification of rail, short-line (existing or new track) • Tax credits for shippers to increase use of rail freight • Diversion of highway funding towards HSR – High Speed Rail