1 / 7

NSF CAREER Young Faculty Perspective

NSF CAREER Young Faculty Perspective. Steve McIntosh Department of Chemical Engineering. My Experience. Awarded NSF CAREER (CBET, Catalysis Program) in 2007. One of two awards that year in the program Since then have served on ~6 regular panels and two CAREER panels. Competitiveness.

meghan
Download Presentation

NSF CAREER Young Faculty Perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NSF CAREERYoung Faculty Perspective Steve McIntosh Department of Chemical Engineering

  2. My Experience • Awarded NSF CAREER (CBET, Catalysis Program) in 2007. • One of two awards that year in the program • Since then have served on ~6 regular panels and two CAREER panels.

  3. Competitiveness • The NSF programs have become extremely oversubscribed. • CAREER is extremely competitive but award rates are not as bad as the regular program (smaller pool).

  4. Why was I successful? • PhD research – Chemical Engineering - focus on catalysis for fuel cells. • Postdoc research – Materials Science – novel materials characterization. • CAREER award – novel materials characterization of catalysts for fuel cells. • I combined my previous work. • Stayed quite ‘close to home’. • Had extensive publications in the area – I could do it. • Novel twist/approach to a common problem. • It’s dangerous to stray too far from your core competence for two reasons: • Can you do it? Do you understand the issues? • Do the people on the panel know who you are?

  5. Why was I successful? • Outreach section • This has changes a bit since my award. • Proposed undergraduate research projects within each section of proposal. • Proposed to develop a new energy themed course. • Proposed to incorporate energy topics in other courses. • That was it! • Again, I could feasibly do this. • I’ve seen many more advanced and detailed proposals since. • Nobody gets an award based on the broader outreach (in my experience).

  6. My top tips? • Serve on panels. As many as possible. Volunteer today. • These people will review your proposal. • Be creative but don’t jump to a new field. • You have no track record in the new area. • Can you really identify and solve a critical problem? Why should I believe you? • Focus on the science. • Make sure your outreach seems feasible. • School outreach programs are commonly proposed – do you have a better idea? • Incorporate broader impacts into the science. • Keep it reasonable – the budget is very tight.

  7. How are proposals reviewed? • Is it well written? Can I read it rapidly? Is it free of critical errors? • Panel members can be reviewing 10 proposals. • Is this a real problem? Are there other more important issues in the field? • Does the PI have the background to succeed at this? • Is there a novel/transformative aspect to the science? • Will that work? Risk vs reward balance • Is outreach reasonable?

More Related