480 likes | 1.74k Views
Attitude-Behavior Consistency. Psychology of Attitudes (PSY320). Outline. Early evidence for lack of consistency LaPiere Corey Wicker's review Improving Attitude-behavior consistency The Principle of Aggregation Single-act versus Multiple-Act Criteria The Theory of Reasoned Action .
E N D
Attitude-Behavior Consistency Psychology of Attitudes (PSY320)
Outline Early evidence for lack of consistency • LaPiere • Corey • Wicker's review Improving Attitude-behavior consistency • The Principle of Aggregation • Single-act versus Multiple-Act Criteria • The Theory of Reasoned Action
Outline 3. Theory of Planned behavior • The best predictor of the future is... • Attitude Accessibility • The Object-Evaluation Association (Fazio) • Response Latency as an Index of Accessibility • Personality Influences
LaPiere Road Trip • Trip with a Chinese couple through the USA – the couple was refused service only once. • LaPiere wrote to the owners and asked them if they would serve a Chinese couple at their establishment - 90% of the replies said ‘NO.’ Results: • negative attitudes (questionnaire) and positive behaviors (actually serving)!
Corey (1937) • Attitude-behavior consistency and cheating. • Objective: predict from the attitude survey who would cheat Results: • No correlation between attitude and behavior.
Wicker’s Review • Wicker (1969) reviewed all the studies on attitude-behavior consistency. Conclusion: • The relationship between attitudes and behavior was very weak. • Psychologists should abandon the concept of an “attitude” (Wicker, 1971).
? How can we explained these discrepancies
Psychometric Principle • Any single measure of behavior / psychological construct (single-act criterion) is not reliable due to the error associated with each single measure. SOLUTION? • Aggregation Principle
Generality • The level of attitude-behavior consistency is related to the level of generality of the constructs that are correlated. • Attitudes are general and are measured in general terms (positive or negative), while actions like ‘praying before meals’ are very specific. • Therefore, we should measure attitude (i.e., general) by looking at the general trend among many behaviors (i.e., aggregation).
Theory of Reasoned Action • The Theory of Reasoned Action is premised on the belief that the immediate predictor of behavior is a behavioral intention.
So what predicts behavioral intention? Behavior: Buying erotic magazines Attitude: includes salient beliefs/thoughts (‘includes beautiful models,’ ‘is sexist,’ ‘entertains.’ • Belief (R)– if you buy an erotic magazine, what is the probability of your salient beliefs coming true (expectancy)? (range from +3 to –3) • Evaluation (e)– how valuable is that salient belief to you? (range from +3 to –3)
Attitude Toward behavior Belief (R) +2 +3 +1 +1 Evaluation (e) +3 +2 -3 +1 (R)(e) +6 +6 -3 +1 +10 Consequences Exciting entertainment Beautiful models Is sexist Funny jokes about sex Total (Σ) ATTITUDE = Σ(R)(e) +10 is pretty high, but will the person buy the magazine? It depends on the person’s subjective norms about the behavior.
Subjective Norms About behavior (NB) -2 -1 +3 -3 (MC) +3 +1 +1 +2 (NB)(MC) -6 -1 +3 -6-10 Important Referents My girlfriend My father My neighbor People in the store Total (Σ) SUBJECTIVE NORMS = Σ(NB)(MC) NB – Normative beliefs (referents’ opinions on magazines?) MC – Motivation to comply (how important is their approval?)
Meta-Analysis Results Attitudinal Beliefs .53 .62 .68 Normative Beliefs .53
Conclusion • Theory of Reasoned Actions shows that sometimes attitudes fail in predicting / influencing behavior. • Social norms can trump attitude (i.e., exert a more important influence on behavior). • The relative influence of attitudes and social norms is influenced by situational and personality factors and may vary across attitude objects. • The theory do not account for situations in which people do not have control over their behavior (i.e., unable to carry out their intentions).
Theory of Planned behavior Ajzen (1985; 1991) proposed a modification to the Theory of Reasoned Actions. He suggested that perceived behavioral control influenced intention and behavior.
Theory of planned behavior • Specific attitudesare better predictors of behavior than are general attitudes (Davidson & Jaccard, 1979). • Subjective norms: People’s beliefs about other’s view of the behavior in question. • Perceived behavioral control: Extent to which people believe they can perform the behavior.
Theory of Planned Behavior Beh. Beliefs Attitudes Evaluations Intention Behavior Norm. Beliefs Subj. Norms Compliance Perceived Beh. Control
Conclusion • The Theory of Planned Behavior uses attitudes towards behaviors to predict behavior, whereas the original problem was to link attitudes towards objects to behaviors. • The Theory of Planned Behavior neglects some additional influences on behavior. • Automated behavior (habits) may reflect neither attitudes nor social norms.
Accessibility Theory (Fazio) • Core Notion - Attitudes will predict behavior if (and only if) they can be activated from memory at the time of the decision. • Attitude must come spontaneously in the situation • Attitude must influence perceptions of an issue or person, serving as a “filter through which the object is viewed”.
Accessibility Theory • According to Fazio’s model, all the information about a specific subject is contained in one node. • The summary evaluation (i.e., attitude +/-) about the subject is contained in another node, connected to the subject node. • The strength of the association between the subject node and the summary evaluation node determines attitude accessibility.
Accessibility Theory • Weak association between the subject and the summary evaluation→ attitude is inaccessible and unlikely to influence behavior. • Instead, arbitrary aspects of the situation/context will tend to determine behavior.
Accessibility Theory • When attitudes are expressed many times, a strong association develops between the summary evaluation and the subject. • Strong association between the two nodes, then spreading occurs quickly from one node to the other (attitude is very accessible) → influence behavior.
Response Latency • Response latency has been used as a measure of accessibility – i.e., “How long does it take for someone to provide an answer/attitude...?”
Moderators of Attitudes/Behavior Consistency • Three key variables which can moderate the relation between attitudes and behavior: • Qualities of the attitude (attitude factors/nature), • Aspects of the situation (situational factors) • Characteristics of the individual (personality factors).
Situational Factors • Situational factors can influence whether an attitude is activated. • Typically, it is assumed that attitudes have a stronger influence on behavior when an attitude is activated in a situation. • However, can you think of situations in which awareness of an attitude reduces the influence on behavior?
Situational Factors • Two types of Situational Factors: • Norms and roles: Attitudes or judgments towards social norms (appropriateness) become stronger – other attitudes are inhibited in a situation “x”. • Scripts: attitude towards the situation trumped other attitudes
Qualities of Attitudes Nature of Attitude – Good/Bad attitudes • Awareness of an attitude strengthen or weaken the relation between attitude and behavior depending on the desirability of the behavior. • Desirable behavior: strengthen attitude-behavior relations (e.g., condom use). • Undesirable behavior: decrease attitude-behavior relations.
Qualities of Attitudes • General vs. Specific • General Attitude (attitude toward object) – Global evaluation across different situations. • Specific attitude (attitude toward the behavior) – Evaluation of a single act/behavior. • Compatibility Principle – Strong relationship between attitude and behavior is possible only if attitudinal predictor corresponds with the behavioral criteria.
Qualities of Attitudes • Attitude Strength • Strong attitude are more likely to influence behavior • Ambivalence. People recognize positive and negative aspects of an attitude object - can moderate the relation between attitude and behavior. • High ambivalence: Behavior can be influenced by the positive or the negative aspects (inconsistent). • Low ambivalence: Only positive or negative aspects are activated (consistent).
Self-Monitoring • Self-monitoring is a personality variable thought to influence behavior. • People who are highin self-monitoring behave according to the situation (most likely behave inconsistently). • People who are lowin self-monitoring draw on feelings and attitudes when behaving (behavior is normally much more consistent across situations).
Conclusion • Whether attitudes influence behaviors depends on several factors. • Attitudes have a stronger effect when they are activated by situational cues. • Attitudes have a stronger effect when people are self-aware. • Consistent attitudes have a stronger effect on behavior than ambivalent attitudes.